Book Review: Crime, Violence, and the Irish in the Nineteenth Century by Kyle Hughes and Donald M. MacRaild (eds.)

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY
Kerron Ó Luain
{"title":"Book Review: Crime, Violence, and the Irish in the Nineteenth Century by Kyle Hughes and Donald M. MacRaild (eds.)","authors":"Kerron Ó Luain","doi":"10.1177/03324893211052455g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"study, epitomised by Conor Morrissey’s recent dedicated study of the subject (based on a PhD supervised appropriately by Fitzpatrick). The more substantial second part, ‘Disguises’, draws heavily on what Fitzpatrick identifies as Blythe’s journalism, although the reader will have to make up their own mind as to whether they are convinced by the evidence presented here for authorship of all the pieces attributed to him. In addition to the level of detail provided here on Blythe’s early career and emerging and changing political ideologies, this is a useful exercise in de-constructing the personal narratives left behind by protagonists in autobiographical works. Furthermore, it adds to our understanding of liberal unionism (or what remained of it) in Ulster around the time of the third home rule crisis and offers insights into both the value and limitations of the Edwardian Irish provincial press. The final section, ‘Explanations’, weighs up the evidence for nine different interpretations of Blythe’s duality. Was he merely acting as a diligent investigative reporter, keen to identify the goings-on in local branches of political secret societies? Was he unsure of his own political leanings at this stage of his life? These hypotheses are on the more innocent end of the scale, which ranges to the more extreme suggestions that he might have been a spy, double-agent or police informer. Irish historical biography, which has been traditionally under-developed, has progressed as a methodological genre within Irish historical studies more recently. However, this should not be mistaken for a biography of Blythe, and it does not purport to be such. Yet it provides significant background detail on a figure who would emerge as one of the most prominent shapers of government policy in the early years of independent Ireland and will serve as a vital starting point for any scholar willing to tackle the complexities of the later Blythe.","PeriodicalId":41191,"journal":{"name":"Irish Economic and Social History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Economic and Social History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03324893211052455g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

study, epitomised by Conor Morrissey’s recent dedicated study of the subject (based on a PhD supervised appropriately by Fitzpatrick). The more substantial second part, ‘Disguises’, draws heavily on what Fitzpatrick identifies as Blythe’s journalism, although the reader will have to make up their own mind as to whether they are convinced by the evidence presented here for authorship of all the pieces attributed to him. In addition to the level of detail provided here on Blythe’s early career and emerging and changing political ideologies, this is a useful exercise in de-constructing the personal narratives left behind by protagonists in autobiographical works. Furthermore, it adds to our understanding of liberal unionism (or what remained of it) in Ulster around the time of the third home rule crisis and offers insights into both the value and limitations of the Edwardian Irish provincial press. The final section, ‘Explanations’, weighs up the evidence for nine different interpretations of Blythe’s duality. Was he merely acting as a diligent investigative reporter, keen to identify the goings-on in local branches of political secret societies? Was he unsure of his own political leanings at this stage of his life? These hypotheses are on the more innocent end of the scale, which ranges to the more extreme suggestions that he might have been a spy, double-agent or police informer. Irish historical biography, which has been traditionally under-developed, has progressed as a methodological genre within Irish historical studies more recently. However, this should not be mistaken for a biography of Blythe, and it does not purport to be such. Yet it provides significant background detail on a figure who would emerge as one of the most prominent shapers of government policy in the early years of independent Ireland and will serve as a vital starting point for any scholar willing to tackle the complexities of the later Blythe.
《书评:十九世纪的犯罪、暴力和爱尔兰人》,凯尔·休斯和唐纳德·m·麦克雷德主编。
康纳·莫里西(Conor Morrissey)最近对这一主题的专门研究(基于菲茨帕特里克(Fitzpatrick)适当指导的博士学位)是这一研究的缩影。第二部分内容更为丰富,“伪装”,大量引用了菲茨帕特里克认为是布莱斯的新闻报道,尽管读者必须自己下定决心,是否相信这里提出的证据,认为所有的文章都是布莱斯写的。除了对布莱斯的早期职业生涯以及政治意识形态的形成和变化提供了详细的描述外,这本书还有助于解构自传体作品中主人公留下的个人叙述。此外,它增加了我们对第三次地方自治危机前后阿尔斯特的自由工会主义(或其残余)的理解,并提供了对爱德华七世时代爱尔兰省级媒体的价值和局限性的见解。最后一节,“解释”,权衡了对布莱斯二元性的九种不同解释的证据。他仅仅是一个勤奋的调查记者,热衷于查明地方政治秘密团体分支的活动吗?在他人生的这个阶段,他还不确定自己的政治倾向吗?这些假设都是相对无害的,也有一些更极端的说法,认为他可能是间谍、双面间谍或警方线人。爱尔兰历史传记,这一直是传统上欠发达,最近已经发展成为一种方法论流派在爱尔兰历史研究。然而,这本书不应该被误认为是布莱斯的传记,而且它也没有这样的意图。然而,它提供了一个重要的背景细节,这个人物将成为爱尔兰独立初期最重要的政府政策塑造者之一,对于任何愿意解决后期布莱斯的复杂性的学者来说,这将是一个重要的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信