Farmers' markets or the supermarket? Channel selection in small farming businesses

Q2 Social Sciences
Juan David Cortes, Jonathan E. Jackson, Andres Felipe Cortes
{"title":"Farmers' markets or the supermarket? Channel selection in small farming businesses","authors":"Juan David Cortes, Jonathan E. Jackson, Andres Felipe Cortes","doi":"10.1108/neje-07-2022-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeDespite the abundance of small-scale farms in the USA and their importance for both rural economic development and food availability, the extensive research on small business management and entrepreneurship has mostly neglected the agricultural context, leaving many of these farms' business challenges unexplored. The authors focus on informing a specific decision faced by small farm managers: selling directly to consumers (i.e. farmer's markets) versus selling through aggregators. By collecting historical data and a series of interviews with industry experts, the authors employ simulation methodology to offer a framework that advises how small-scale farmers can allocate their product across these two channels to increase revenue in a given season. The results, which are relevant for operations management, small business management and entrepreneurship literature, can help small-scale farmers improve their performance and compete against their larger counterparts.Design/methodology/approachThe authors rely on historical and interview data from key industry players (an aggregator and a small farm manager) to design a simulation analysis that determines which factors influence season-long farm revenue performance under varying strategies of channel allocation and commodity production.FindingsThe model suggests that farm managers should plan to evenly split their production between the two distribution channels, but if an even split is not possible, they should plan to keep a larger percentage in the nonaggregator (farmers' market/direct) channel. Further, the authors find that farmers can benefit significantly from a strong aggregator channel customer base, which suggests that farmers should promote and advertise the aggregator channel even if they only use it for a limited amount of their product.Originality/valueThe authors integrate small business management and operations management literature to study a widely understudied context and present practical implications for the performance of small-scale farms.","PeriodicalId":32839,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Entrepreneurship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/neje-07-2022-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeDespite the abundance of small-scale farms in the USA and their importance for both rural economic development and food availability, the extensive research on small business management and entrepreneurship has mostly neglected the agricultural context, leaving many of these farms' business challenges unexplored. The authors focus on informing a specific decision faced by small farm managers: selling directly to consumers (i.e. farmer's markets) versus selling through aggregators. By collecting historical data and a series of interviews with industry experts, the authors employ simulation methodology to offer a framework that advises how small-scale farmers can allocate their product across these two channels to increase revenue in a given season. The results, which are relevant for operations management, small business management and entrepreneurship literature, can help small-scale farmers improve their performance and compete against their larger counterparts.Design/methodology/approachThe authors rely on historical and interview data from key industry players (an aggregator and a small farm manager) to design a simulation analysis that determines which factors influence season-long farm revenue performance under varying strategies of channel allocation and commodity production.FindingsThe model suggests that farm managers should plan to evenly split their production between the two distribution channels, but if an even split is not possible, they should plan to keep a larger percentage in the nonaggregator (farmers' market/direct) channel. Further, the authors find that farmers can benefit significantly from a strong aggregator channel customer base, which suggests that farmers should promote and advertise the aggregator channel even if they only use it for a limited amount of their product.Originality/valueThe authors integrate small business management and operations management literature to study a widely understudied context and present practical implications for the performance of small-scale farms.
农贸市场还是超市?小农企业的渠道选择
尽管美国有大量的小型农场,它们对农村经济发展和粮食供应都很重要,但关于小企业管理和创业的广泛研究大多忽视了农业背景,使许多这些农场的商业挑战未被探索。作者专注于告知小农场管理者面临的一个具体决策:直接向消费者销售(即农民市场)还是通过集成商销售。通过收集历史数据和对行业专家的一系列采访,作者采用模拟方法提供了一个框架,该框架建议小规模农民如何在这两个渠道中分配他们的产品,以增加特定季节的收入。研究结果与经营管理、小企业管理和创业文献相关,可以帮助小农提高绩效,与规模较大的农户竞争。设计/方法/方法作者依靠来自主要行业参与者(一个聚合商和一个小农场经理)的历史和访谈数据,设计了一个模拟分析,以确定在不同的渠道分配和商品生产策略下,哪些因素会影响整个季节的农场收入表现。该模型表明,农场管理者应该计划在两个分销渠道之间平均分配他们的产量,但如果平均分配是不可能的,他们应该计划在非聚合渠道(农贸市场/直接)中保持更大的比例。此外,作者还发现,农民可以从强大的聚合渠道客户基础中获益良多,这表明农民应该推广和宣传聚合渠道,即使他们只将其用于有限数量的产品。原创性/价值作者整合了小企业管理和运营管理文献,研究了一个广泛未被充分研究的背景,并提出了对小规模农场绩效的实际影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New England Journal of Entrepreneurship
New England Journal of Entrepreneurship Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信