EXPLORING RECIPROCITY IN PERCEPTIONS ON TELECARE WITHIN THE INFORMAL CARER–CARE RECEIVER DYAD

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
S. Hvalič-Touzery, K. Smole-Orehek, V. Dolničar
{"title":"EXPLORING RECIPROCITY IN PERCEPTIONS ON\nTELECARE WITHIN THE INFORMAL CARER–CARE\nRECEIVER DYAD","authors":"S. Hvalič-Touzery, K. Smole-Orehek, V. Dolničar","doi":"10.51936/tip.58.3.840-859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Informal carers’ telecare acceptance decisions\ndepend on how their care recipients perceive telecare,\nyet this relationship has not been researched very much.\nThis article draws on qualitative data gathered from\ninformal carers to explore reciprocity in telecare perceptions\nwithin dyads of informal carers and care receivers.\nA 4-month intervention study was conducted from\n2018 to 2019 in the Central Slovenia region. A purposive\nsample of 22 older adults and their informal carers\ntested two telecare solutions. Thematic analysis was\nconducted using Atlas.ti 8, with four themes emerging:\n1. the benefits of telecare use for older adults; 2. reluctance,\nrejection or negative perceptions of telecare; 3.\nthe potential violation of older adults’ privacy; and 4.\nthe importance of external and internal information\nfor effective telecare use. This study confirms that that\ntelecare perception is dyadically interdependent.\nKeywords: assistive technologies, informal care, ageing\nin place, dyads, older adults","PeriodicalId":44389,"journal":{"name":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51936/tip.58.3.840-859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract. Informal carers’ telecare acceptance decisions depend on how their care recipients perceive telecare, yet this relationship has not been researched very much. This article draws on qualitative data gathered from informal carers to explore reciprocity in telecare perceptions within dyads of informal carers and care receivers. A 4-month intervention study was conducted from 2018 to 2019 in the Central Slovenia region. A purposive sample of 22 older adults and their informal carers tested two telecare solutions. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti 8, with four themes emerging: 1. the benefits of telecare use for older adults; 2. reluctance, rejection or negative perceptions of telecare; 3. the potential violation of older adults’ privacy; and 4. the importance of external and internal information for effective telecare use. This study confirms that that telecare perception is dyadically interdependent. Keywords: assistive technologies, informal care, ageing in place, dyads, older adults
探讨非正式照顾者-照顾者二人组中对照顾内容认知的互惠性
摘要非正式护理人员的远程护理接受决定取决于他们的护理对象如何看待远程护理,但这种关系尚未得到很多研究。本文利用从非正式照护者那里收集的定性数据来探讨非正式照护者和接受照护者之间远程护理感知的互惠性。2018年至2019年在斯洛文尼亚中部地区进行了一项为期4个月的干预研究。对22名老年人及其非正式职业进行了有目的的抽样调查,测试了两种远程医疗解决方案。使用Atlas进行专题分析。第8章,出现了四个主题:远程医疗对老年人的好处;2. 对远程医疗的不情愿、拒绝或负面看法;3.对老年人隐私的潜在侵犯;和4。外部和内部信息对有效远程医疗的重要性。这项研究证实,电子感知是相互依赖的。关键词:辅助技术,非正式护理,就地养老,二人组,老年人
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
TEORIJA IN PRAKSA
TEORIJA IN PRAKSA SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信