{"title":"EXPLORING RECIPROCITY IN PERCEPTIONS ON\nTELECARE WITHIN THE INFORMAL CARER–CARE\nRECEIVER DYAD","authors":"S. Hvalič-Touzery, K. Smole-Orehek, V. Dolničar","doi":"10.51936/tip.58.3.840-859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Informal carers’ telecare acceptance decisions\ndepend on how their care recipients perceive telecare,\nyet this relationship has not been researched very much.\nThis article draws on qualitative data gathered from\ninformal carers to explore reciprocity in telecare perceptions\nwithin dyads of informal carers and care receivers.\nA 4-month intervention study was conducted from\n2018 to 2019 in the Central Slovenia region. A purposive\nsample of 22 older adults and their informal carers\ntested two telecare solutions. Thematic analysis was\nconducted using Atlas.ti 8, with four themes emerging:\n1. the benefits of telecare use for older adults; 2. reluctance,\nrejection or negative perceptions of telecare; 3.\nthe potential violation of older adults’ privacy; and 4.\nthe importance of external and internal information\nfor effective telecare use. This study confirms that that\ntelecare perception is dyadically interdependent.\nKeywords: assistive technologies, informal care, ageing\nin place, dyads, older adults","PeriodicalId":44389,"journal":{"name":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51936/tip.58.3.840-859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Abstract. Informal carers’ telecare acceptance decisions
depend on how their care recipients perceive telecare,
yet this relationship has not been researched very much.
This article draws on qualitative data gathered from
informal carers to explore reciprocity in telecare perceptions
within dyads of informal carers and care receivers.
A 4-month intervention study was conducted from
2018 to 2019 in the Central Slovenia region. A purposive
sample of 22 older adults and their informal carers
tested two telecare solutions. Thematic analysis was
conducted using Atlas.ti 8, with four themes emerging:
1. the benefits of telecare use for older adults; 2. reluctance,
rejection or negative perceptions of telecare; 3.
the potential violation of older adults’ privacy; and 4.
the importance of external and internal information
for effective telecare use. This study confirms that that
telecare perception is dyadically interdependent.
Keywords: assistive technologies, informal care, ageing
in place, dyads, older adults