{"title":"Remarks on Common Possession Between Law and History","authors":"Tommaso dalla Massara, Alvise Schiavon","doi":"10.1515/gj-2021-0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract ‘Common possession’ can be designated as a distinguishing feature of the legal status of common goods, as opposed to the monopolistic character of real rights and especially property. The paper aims at proving how the study of the Roman legal category of res in usu publico can shed a light on the interpretation of existing legislation and ground a legal regulation of the commons based on possessory remedies.","PeriodicalId":34941,"journal":{"name":"Global Jurist","volume":"21 1","pages":"561 - 570"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Jurist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2021-0077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract ‘Common possession’ can be designated as a distinguishing feature of the legal status of common goods, as opposed to the monopolistic character of real rights and especially property. The paper aims at proving how the study of the Roman legal category of res in usu publico can shed a light on the interpretation of existing legislation and ground a legal regulation of the commons based on possessory remedies.
期刊介绍:
Global Jurist offers a forum for scholarly cyber-debate on issues of comparative law, law and economics, international law, law and society, and legal anthropology. Edited by an international board of leading comparative law scholars from all the continents, Global Jurist is mindful of globalization and respectful of cultural differences. We will develop a truly international community of legal scholars where linguistic and cultural barriers are overcome and legal issues are finally discussed outside of the narrow limits imposed by positivism, parochialism, ethnocentrism, imperialism and chauvinism in the law. Submission is welcome from all over the world and particularly encouraged from the Global South.