Waiving Medicaid Regulations During a Public Health Crisis: Identifying Heterogeneous Effects of Suspending Pre-Admission Screening Requirements on COVID-19 Deaths

Q2 Health Professions
J. Semprini, B. Kaskie
{"title":"Waiving Medicaid Regulations During a Public Health Crisis: Identifying Heterogeneous Effects of Suspending Pre-Admission Screening Requirements on COVID-19 Deaths","authors":"J. Semprini, B. Kaskie","doi":"10.31389/jltc.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, states were authorized to waive Pre-Admission Screening Resident Review (PASRR), a federal regulation requiring all individuals be evaluated before admission into a federally qualified nursing facility. We suspect states waived PASRR to reallocate resources from admission towards infection control and outbreak mitigation. However, by waiving PASRR and fast-tracking admissions, vulnerable elders may have been exposed to COVID-19 and unexpectedly placed at substantial risk for increased morbidity. Methodology: We reviewed all COVID-19 Medicaid emergency waiver requests to identify states waiving PASRR. We then analyzed daily, state-level COVID-19 deaths with a panel regression model, controlling for state and time fixed effects, and daily case rates. Finally, we expanded the model to identify heterogeneous effects shaped by market and administrative oversight factors. Results: Suspending PASRR led to significant declines in state COVID-19 deaths (–2.3 deaths per 100,000 population, p < 0.001). However, the effect waiving PASRR varied by excess nursing bed capacity (7.3 deaths per 100,000 population, p = 0.024) and historical PASRR deficiencies (0.9 deaths per 100,000, p = 0.009). Implications: Within the first month of the COVID-19 emergency invocation, nearly all states suspended PASRR, which our estimates suggest averted 7,600 deaths nationwide. However, we found that greater pre-emergency bed availability and less administrative oversight may have reduced the effectiveness of a PASRR waiver. While future research should aim to understand the mechanisms for such heterogeneity, immediate concerns relate to the variation, both between and within states, for adhering to a critical regulation protecting older adults. © 2022 The Author(s).","PeriodicalId":73807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of long-term care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of long-term care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, states were authorized to waive Pre-Admission Screening Resident Review (PASRR), a federal regulation requiring all individuals be evaluated before admission into a federally qualified nursing facility. We suspect states waived PASRR to reallocate resources from admission towards infection control and outbreak mitigation. However, by waiving PASRR and fast-tracking admissions, vulnerable elders may have been exposed to COVID-19 and unexpectedly placed at substantial risk for increased morbidity. Methodology: We reviewed all COVID-19 Medicaid emergency waiver requests to identify states waiving PASRR. We then analyzed daily, state-level COVID-19 deaths with a panel regression model, controlling for state and time fixed effects, and daily case rates. Finally, we expanded the model to identify heterogeneous effects shaped by market and administrative oversight factors. Results: Suspending PASRR led to significant declines in state COVID-19 deaths (–2.3 deaths per 100,000 population, p < 0.001). However, the effect waiving PASRR varied by excess nursing bed capacity (7.3 deaths per 100,000 population, p = 0.024) and historical PASRR deficiencies (0.9 deaths per 100,000, p = 0.009). Implications: Within the first month of the COVID-19 emergency invocation, nearly all states suspended PASRR, which our estimates suggest averted 7,600 deaths nationwide. However, we found that greater pre-emergency bed availability and less administrative oversight may have reduced the effectiveness of a PASRR waiver. While future research should aim to understand the mechanisms for such heterogeneity, immediate concerns relate to the variation, both between and within states, for adhering to a critical regulation protecting older adults. © 2022 The Author(s).
公共卫生危机期间放弃医疗补助条例:确定暂停入院前筛查要求对新冠肺炎死亡的异质性影响
背景:在COVID-19突发公共卫生事件期间,各州被授权放弃入院前筛查居民审查(PASRR),这是一项联邦法规,要求在进入联邦合格的护理机构之前对所有个人进行评估。我们怀疑各州放弃PASRR是为了将资源从入院重新分配到感染控制和疫情缓解上。然而,通过放弃PASRR和快速准入,脆弱的老年人可能已经接触到COVID-19,并意外地面临发病率增加的巨大风险。方法:我们审查了所有COVID-19医疗补助紧急豁免请求,以确定放弃PASRR的州。然后,我们使用面板回归模型分析了每日州一级的COVID-19死亡人数,控制了州和时间固定效应以及每日病例率。最后,我们扩展了模型,以识别市场和行政监管因素形成的异质性效应。结果:暂停PASRR导致州COVID-19死亡人数显著下降(每10万人中有2.3人死亡,p < 0.001)。然而,免除PASRR的效果因护理床位过剩(每10万人中有7.3人死亡,p = 0.024)和历史PASRR不足(每10万人中有0.9人死亡,p = 0.009)而异。影响:在COVID-19紧急启动的第一个月内,几乎所有州都暂停了PASRR,我们的估计表明,这在全国范围内避免了7600人死亡。然而,我们发现更多的急诊前床位可用性和更少的行政监督可能降低了PASRR豁免的有效性。虽然未来的研究应旨在了解这种异质性的机制,但迫切需要关注的是各州之间和各州内部的差异,以遵守保护老年人的关键法规。©2022作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
33 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信