Forever Prisoners: How the United States Made the World’s Largest Immigration Detention System by Elliott Young (review)

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Tokunbo Okanla
{"title":"Forever Prisoners: How the United States Made the World’s Largest Immigration Detention System by Elliott Young (review)","authors":"Tokunbo Okanla","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2023.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"separatists organized a referendum on independence that Spain’s Constitutional Tribunal had already declared illegal. In response to the illegal referendum, the conservative administration of Mariano Rajoy rescinded Catalonia’s home rule charter. Sánchez inherited the crisis from Rajoy, whose heavy-handed approach only served to exacerbate the crisis, and skillfully used Franco’s exhumation to signal a new, conciliatory tone in the relations between Madrid and the Catalans. By exploring the work of organizations such as ARMH and unpacking the politics of Franco’s exhumation, Iturriaga and Faber have made a valuable contribution to the scholarship on the politics of memory in contemporary Spain. Taken together, these works highlight the titanic role of human rights organizations and activists in pressing politicians to take action on so many issues related to the past that were conveniently swept under the rug during the democratic transition. Spain’s democratic transformation, often described by democratization scholars as “a miracle,”7 is owed in no small measure to the willingness of victims of political violence to put their demands for recognition on hold until democratic institutions and practices were fully consolidated. But the books by Iturriaga and Faber also contribute valuable insights into the global politics of coming to terms with the past that often go unnoticed or ignored. Above all, perhaps, they reveal the national peculiarities of reckoning with a dark and difficult history. Despite attempts by the human rights community to depict the process of coming to terms with the past as a universal experience primarily intended to seek justice and accountability, the reality on the ground often looks strikingly different. For a whole host of reasons—including Franco’s cynical manipulation of history for partisan purposes and the deliberate repression of the memory of the past during the democratic transition—coming to terms with the past in Spain is less about seeking justice and accountability than it is about recovering and reconstructing history. This peculiarity about Spain does not make the country’s coming to terms with the past any less interesting or worthwhile.","PeriodicalId":47589,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Quarterly","volume":"45 1","pages":"166 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Rights Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2023.0008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

separatists organized a referendum on independence that Spain’s Constitutional Tribunal had already declared illegal. In response to the illegal referendum, the conservative administration of Mariano Rajoy rescinded Catalonia’s home rule charter. Sánchez inherited the crisis from Rajoy, whose heavy-handed approach only served to exacerbate the crisis, and skillfully used Franco’s exhumation to signal a new, conciliatory tone in the relations between Madrid and the Catalans. By exploring the work of organizations such as ARMH and unpacking the politics of Franco’s exhumation, Iturriaga and Faber have made a valuable contribution to the scholarship on the politics of memory in contemporary Spain. Taken together, these works highlight the titanic role of human rights organizations and activists in pressing politicians to take action on so many issues related to the past that were conveniently swept under the rug during the democratic transition. Spain’s democratic transformation, often described by democratization scholars as “a miracle,”7 is owed in no small measure to the willingness of victims of political violence to put their demands for recognition on hold until democratic institutions and practices were fully consolidated. But the books by Iturriaga and Faber also contribute valuable insights into the global politics of coming to terms with the past that often go unnoticed or ignored. Above all, perhaps, they reveal the national peculiarities of reckoning with a dark and difficult history. Despite attempts by the human rights community to depict the process of coming to terms with the past as a universal experience primarily intended to seek justice and accountability, the reality on the ground often looks strikingly different. For a whole host of reasons—including Franco’s cynical manipulation of history for partisan purposes and the deliberate repression of the memory of the past during the democratic transition—coming to terms with the past in Spain is less about seeking justice and accountability than it is about recovering and reconstructing history. This peculiarity about Spain does not make the country’s coming to terms with the past any less interesting or worthwhile.
《永远的囚犯:美国如何成为世界上最大的移民拘留系统》,Elliott Young著(评论)
分裂分子组织了一次独立公投,西班牙宪法法庭已经宣布这次公投是非法的。作为对非法公投的回应,马里亚诺·拉霍伊(Mariano Rajoy)的保守派政府撤销了加泰罗尼亚的地方自治宪章。Sánchez从拉霍伊那里继承了这场危机,拉霍伊的高压手段只会加剧危机,他巧妙地利用佛朗哥的尸体,为马德里和加泰罗尼亚之间的关系发出了一种新的和解基调。通过探索ARMH等组织的工作,并揭示佛朗哥挖掘的政治,伊图里亚加和费伯对当代西班牙记忆政治的学术研究做出了宝贵的贡献。总而言之,这些作品突出了人权组织和活动人士的巨大作用,他们向政治家施压,要求他们对许多与过去有关的问题采取行动,这些问题在民主转型期间被轻易地掩盖了。西班牙的民主转型常常被民主化学者形容为“奇迹”,这在很大程度上要归功于政治暴力受害者的意愿,在民主制度和实践得到充分巩固之前,他们暂停了对承认的要求。但伊图里亚加和费伯的书也为面对过去的全球政治提供了宝贵的见解,而过去往往被忽视或忽视。也许最重要的是,它们揭示了这个国家在面对一段黑暗而艰难的历史时的特点。尽管人权界试图将接受过去的过程描述为一种主要旨在寻求正义和问责制的普遍经验,但实地的现实往往看起来截然不同。出于一系列原因——包括佛朗哥出于党派目的对历史的愤世嫉俗的操纵,以及在民主转型期间对过去记忆的蓄意压制——在西班牙与过去达成协议与其说是为了寻求正义和责任,不如说是为了恢复和重建历史。西班牙的这种特殊性并没有使这个国家接受过去变得不那么有趣或不那么有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Now entering its twenty-fifth year, Human Rights Quarterly is widely recognizedas the leader in the field of human rights. Articles written by experts from around the world and from a range of disciplines are edited to be understood by the intelligent reader. The Quarterly provides up-to-date information on important developments within the United Nations and regional human rights organizations, both governmental and non-governmental. It presents current work in human rights research and policy analysis, reviews of related books, and philosophical essays probing the fundamental nature of human rights as defined by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信