Lógica argumental de las políticas sobre envejecimiento y vejez en Uruguay: producción de sentido, tensiones y hegemonías

IF 0.4 Q4 DEMOGRAPHY
Fernando Berriel, Carolina A. Guidotti Gonzalez
{"title":"Lógica argumental de las políticas sobre envejecimiento y vejez en Uruguay: producción de sentido, tensiones y hegemonías","authors":"Fernando Berriel, Carolina A. Guidotti Gonzalez","doi":"10.31406/RELAP2021.V15.I1.N28.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Second Plan for Aging and Old Age, 2016-2019, was approved in November 2016 in Uruguay, which aims to develop further the perspective of integrality and rights of the elderly. This paper presents a thematic analysis of the plan and focuses on identifying its argumentative logic, its main approach, plus its meanings on aging, old age, and the elderly. As researches, we assume that the formulation of policies and the rhetorical logic of the documents are social practices that produce reality. In addition, we analyzed the level of interdisciplinarity expressed on the plan: the greater or lesser disciplinary hegemony on it. Lastly, we made some considerations about the role of the disciplines in shaping public policies on aging and old age in the country.","PeriodicalId":30944,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latinoamericana de Poblacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latinoamericana de Poblacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31406/RELAP2021.V15.I1.N28.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Second Plan for Aging and Old Age, 2016-2019, was approved in November 2016 in Uruguay, which aims to develop further the perspective of integrality and rights of the elderly. This paper presents a thematic analysis of the plan and focuses on identifying its argumentative logic, its main approach, plus its meanings on aging, old age, and the elderly. As researches, we assume that the formulation of policies and the rhetorical logic of the documents are social practices that produce reality. In addition, we analyzed the level of interdisciplinarity expressed on the plan: the greater or lesser disciplinary hegemony on it. Lastly, we made some considerations about the role of the disciplines in shaping public policies on aging and old age in the country.
乌拉圭老龄化和老年政策的论证逻辑:意义的产生、紧张和霸权
乌拉圭于2016年11月批准了第二个老龄化和老年计划(2016-2019),该计划旨在进一步发展老年人的完整性和权利观。本文对该计划进行了专题分析,重点确定了其论证逻辑、主要方法以及对老龄化、老年和老年人的意义。作为研究,我们假设政策的制定和文件的修辞逻辑是产生现实的社会实践。此外,我们还分析了规划上表达的跨学科程度:规划上的学科霸权或大或小。最后,我们对学科在形成国家老龄化和老年公共政策中的作用进行了一些考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信