Is External Carotid Artery Hemodynamics Helpful in Detecting Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis?

Q4 Medicine
J. Zakko, Kejal Shah, Cameron Best, Laureen Baetz, M. Haurani, B. Satiani
{"title":"Is External Carotid Artery Hemodynamics Helpful in Detecting Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis?","authors":"J. Zakko, Kejal Shah, Cameron Best, Laureen Baetz, M. Haurani, B. Satiani","doi":"10.1177/15443167221121663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There is a paucity of validated external carotid artery (ECA) velocity criteria and data on the association between ECA velocities and internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis by carotid duplex ultrasound (CDU) scanning. Our objectives were to determine the relationships between ECA peak systolic velocity (PSV) and percent stenosis seen on confirmatory imaging, as well as to correlate ECA hemodynamics with known ICA disease by CDU. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who had CDU, as well as confirmatory testing such as angiography, at a single academic medical center. ICA stenosis was grouped into 4 categories (0 = <50%, 1 = 50%-69%, 2 = 70%-99%, 3 = 100%) based on validated CDU criteria. ECA PSVs were analyzed, in addition to degree of both ECA and ICA stenosis from the same CDU study. Results: Of 247 carotid arteries reviewed, 136 vessels were included in the final analysis. The mean PSV of the normal ECA cohort (<50% ECA stenosis per the NASCET measurement method) was 135.3 ± 82.1 cm/s, and the mean PSV of the diseased ECA cohort was 279.7 ± 112.2 cm/s. Mean ECA PSV for each category of ICA stenosis was: ICA category 0 = 119.9 cm/s; category 1 = 200.4 cm/s; category 2 = 167.7 cm/s; and category 3 = 155.5 cm/s. There was a statistically significant but non-linear difference in ECA velocities between ICA stenosis categories 0 vs 1 (mean rank diff. −49.91 cm/s; P = .0007); and 0 vs 2 (mean rank diff. −32.61 cm/s; P = .0047). Conclusion: We have demonstrated a possible separation of <50% vs ≥50% stenosis of the ICA using ECA PSV. Although the data suggest a weak but statistically significant correlation between ECA PSV and degree of ICA stenosis, further data with a larger sample size and confirmatory studies are needed to utilize ECA hemodynamics to indicate ICA disease.","PeriodicalId":52510,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound","volume":"47 1","pages":"26 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Vascular Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15443167221121663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is a paucity of validated external carotid artery (ECA) velocity criteria and data on the association between ECA velocities and internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis by carotid duplex ultrasound (CDU) scanning. Our objectives were to determine the relationships between ECA peak systolic velocity (PSV) and percent stenosis seen on confirmatory imaging, as well as to correlate ECA hemodynamics with known ICA disease by CDU. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who had CDU, as well as confirmatory testing such as angiography, at a single academic medical center. ICA stenosis was grouped into 4 categories (0 = <50%, 1 = 50%-69%, 2 = 70%-99%, 3 = 100%) based on validated CDU criteria. ECA PSVs were analyzed, in addition to degree of both ECA and ICA stenosis from the same CDU study. Results: Of 247 carotid arteries reviewed, 136 vessels were included in the final analysis. The mean PSV of the normal ECA cohort (<50% ECA stenosis per the NASCET measurement method) was 135.3 ± 82.1 cm/s, and the mean PSV of the diseased ECA cohort was 279.7 ± 112.2 cm/s. Mean ECA PSV for each category of ICA stenosis was: ICA category 0 = 119.9 cm/s; category 1 = 200.4 cm/s; category 2 = 167.7 cm/s; and category 3 = 155.5 cm/s. There was a statistically significant but non-linear difference in ECA velocities between ICA stenosis categories 0 vs 1 (mean rank diff. −49.91 cm/s; P = .0007); and 0 vs 2 (mean rank diff. −32.61 cm/s; P = .0047). Conclusion: We have demonstrated a possible separation of <50% vs ≥50% stenosis of the ICA using ECA PSV. Although the data suggest a weak but statistically significant correlation between ECA PSV and degree of ICA stenosis, further data with a larger sample size and confirmatory studies are needed to utilize ECA hemodynamics to indicate ICA disease.
颈外动脉血流动力学有助于检测颈内动脉狭窄吗?
导读:目前缺乏经验证的颈外动脉(ECA)速度标准,以及颈动脉双工超声(CDU)扫描的ECA速度与颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄之间关系的数据。我们的目的是确定ECA峰值收缩速度(PSV)与确认性影像学上看到的狭窄百分比之间的关系,以及通过CDU将ECA血流动力学与已知ICA疾病联系起来。方法:在单一学术医疗中心对患有CDU的患者进行回顾性图表回顾,并进行确认性检查,如血管造影。根据验证的CDU标准将ICA狭窄分为4类(0 = <50%,1 = 50% ~ 69%,2 = 70% ~ 99%,3 = 100%)。分析ECA psv,以及同一CDU研究中ECA和ICA的狭窄程度。结果:在247条颈动脉中,136条血管被纳入最终分析。正常ECA组(根据NASCET测量方法,<50% ECA狭窄)的平均PSV为135.3±82.1 cm/s,病变ECA组的平均PSV为279.7±112.2 cm/s。各类型ICA狭窄的平均ECA PSV为:ICA 0 = 119.9 cm/s;类别1 = 200.4 cm/s;类别2 = 167.7 cm/s;类别3 = 155.5 cm/s。在ICA狭窄类别0和1之间,ECA速度有统计学意义但非线性差异(平均秩差为- 49.91 cm/s;P = .0007);0 vs 2(平均等级差- 32.61 cm/s;P = .0047)。结论:我们已经证明了使用ECA PSV可以分离<50%和≥50%的ICA狭窄。虽然数据显示ECA PSV与ICA狭窄程度之间存在微弱但具有统计学意义的相关性,但需要进一步的数据和更大的样本量和确证性研究来利用ECA血流动力学来指示ICA疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Vascular Ultrasound
Journal for Vascular Ultrasound Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信