Documentation of Peripheral Auditory Function in Studies of the Auditory P300 Response

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Janushca van der Merwe, Leigh Biagio-de Jager, F. Mahomed-Asmail, James W. Hall
{"title":"Documentation of Peripheral Auditory Function in Studies of the Auditory P300 Response","authors":"Janushca van der Merwe, Leigh Biagio-de Jager, F. Mahomed-Asmail, James W. Hall","doi":"10.1027/0269-8803/a000312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. A critical review was conducted to examine whether the peripheral hearing status of participants with neurological and psychological disorders was documented in published clinical studies of the auditory P300 response. Literature searches were conducted with three databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Studies of participants with seven neurological or psychological disorders were included in the study. Each disorder was coupled with the main search phrase in separate searches on each database. Of the total 102 papers which met the inclusion criteria, the majority (64%) did not describe the peripheral hearing sensitivity of participants. In this review with studies that included participants at risk for hearing impairment, particularly age-related hearing loss, only a single publication adequately described formal hearing evaluation. Peripheral hearing status is rarely defined in studies of the P300 response. The inclusion of participants with a hearing loss likely affects the validity of findings for these studies. We recommend formal hearing assessment prior to inclusion of participants in studies of the auditory P300 response. The findings of this study may increase the awareness among researchers outside the field of audiology of the effects of peripheral hearing loss on the auditory P300.","PeriodicalId":50075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. A critical review was conducted to examine whether the peripheral hearing status of participants with neurological and psychological disorders was documented in published clinical studies of the auditory P300 response. Literature searches were conducted with three databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Studies of participants with seven neurological or psychological disorders were included in the study. Each disorder was coupled with the main search phrase in separate searches on each database. Of the total 102 papers which met the inclusion criteria, the majority (64%) did not describe the peripheral hearing sensitivity of participants. In this review with studies that included participants at risk for hearing impairment, particularly age-related hearing loss, only a single publication adequately described formal hearing evaluation. Peripheral hearing status is rarely defined in studies of the P300 response. The inclusion of participants with a hearing loss likely affects the validity of findings for these studies. We recommend formal hearing assessment prior to inclusion of participants in studies of the auditory P300 response. The findings of this study may increase the awareness among researchers outside the field of audiology of the effects of peripheral hearing loss on the auditory P300.
P300听觉反应研究中外周听觉功能的记录
摘要我们进行了一项重要的综述,以检查患有神经和心理疾病的参与者的外周听力状况是否在已发表的P300听觉反应的临床研究中有记录。文献检索使用三个数据库:PubMed、PsycINFO和Scopus。研究对象包括患有七种神经或心理疾病的参与者。在每个数据库的单独搜索中,每种疾病都与主要搜索短语相关联。在符合纳入标准的102篇论文中,大多数(64%)没有描述参与者的外周听力敏感性。在本综述中,研究纳入了有听力损害风险的参与者,特别是与年龄相关的听力损失,只有一篇出版物充分描述了正式的听力评估。在P300反应的研究中,外周听力状态很少被定义。纳入有听力损失的参与者可能会影响这些研究结果的有效性。我们建议在参与P300听觉反应研究之前进行正式的听力评估。本研究的发现可能会增加听力学领域以外的研究人员对周围性听力损失对听觉P300的影响的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychophysiology
Journal of Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychophysiology is an international periodical that presents original research in all fields employing psychophysiological measures on human subjects. Contributions are published from psychology, physiology, clinical psychology, psychiatry, neurosciences, and pharmacology. Communications on new psychophysiological methods are presented as well. Space is also allocated for letters to the editor and book reviews. Occasional special issues are devoted to important current issues in psychophysiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信