Differentiated perceived match load and its variability according to playing position in professional soccer players during an entire season

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION
Kinesiology Pub Date : 2020-04-20 DOI:10.26582/k.52.1.13
Unai Azcárate, J. Yanci, A. Los Arcos
{"title":"Differentiated perceived match load and its variability according to playing position in professional soccer players during an entire season","authors":"Unai Azcárate, J. Yanci, A. Los Arcos","doi":"10.26582/k.52.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The\naims were to assess differentiated perceived match exertion and its variability according to playing position\nfor professional soccer players. Nineteen Spanish players declared their\nrespiratory and muscular perceived exertions (PEs) after official matches during\nan entire season. Players were classified according to their playing position. In order to\nassess differentiated perceived match exertion, soccer players were asked to\nassess their perceived level of exertion following each official match. Considerable\ndifferences (p<.05; ES=.41-2.49)\nwere found between some playing positions but not always in both dimensions of PE\n(respiratory and muscular). Advanced midfielders (AvMs), wide midfielders\n(WMs) and wing backs (WnBs)\nreported the highest match respiratory PE and muscular PE scores. Furthermore,\nmatch-to-match differentiated perceived match exertion variability ranged from\n12.8 to 27.7% for respiratory perceived exertion and from 11.5 to 25.2% for muscular\nperceived exertion according to playing position. Match respiratory-muscular PE differences\nvaried among the playing positions, showing higher muscular PE than respiratory\nPE in central backs (CBs), WMs and central midfielders (CMs) (p<.05; ES=-.35 to .68), but higher respiratory\nPE than muscular PE in wing backs (p<.05; ES=-.35). Soccer differentiated perceived\nmatch exertion is different inter and intra some playing positions, showing\nlarge swings for match-to-match variability between playing positions. These\nfacts confirm that the deconstruction of the overall PE provides a more accurate\nevaluation of the subjective match internal load in some playing positions.","PeriodicalId":49943,"journal":{"name":"Kinesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.26582/k.52.1.13","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26582/k.52.1.13","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aims were to assess differentiated perceived match exertion and its variability according to playing position for professional soccer players. Nineteen Spanish players declared their respiratory and muscular perceived exertions (PEs) after official matches during an entire season. Players were classified according to their playing position. In order to assess differentiated perceived match exertion, soccer players were asked to assess their perceived level of exertion following each official match. Considerable differences (p<.05; ES=.41-2.49) were found between some playing positions but not always in both dimensions of PE (respiratory and muscular). Advanced midfielders (AvMs), wide midfielders (WMs) and wing backs (WnBs) reported the highest match respiratory PE and muscular PE scores. Furthermore, match-to-match differentiated perceived match exertion variability ranged from 12.8 to 27.7% for respiratory perceived exertion and from 11.5 to 25.2% for muscular perceived exertion according to playing position. Match respiratory-muscular PE differences varied among the playing positions, showing higher muscular PE than respiratory PE in central backs (CBs), WMs and central midfielders (CMs) (p<.05; ES=-.35 to .68), but higher respiratory PE than muscular PE in wing backs (p<.05; ES=-.35). Soccer differentiated perceived match exertion is different inter and intra some playing positions, showing large swings for match-to-match variability between playing positions. These facts confirm that the deconstruction of the overall PE provides a more accurate evaluation of the subjective match internal load in some playing positions.
职业足球运动员在整个赛季中根据比赛位置的不同感知比赛负荷及其变化
研究旨在评估职业足球运动员根据比赛位置的差异感知比赛用力及其可变性。19名西班牙球员在整个赛季的正式比赛后宣布了他们的呼吸和肌肉感觉用力(PE)。球员根据他们的位置进行分类。为了评估不同的比赛用力程度,足球运动员被要求在每场正式比赛后评估他们的用力程度。在某些比赛姿势之间发现了显著差异(p<0.05;ES=.41-2.49),但在PE(呼吸和肌肉)的两个维度上并不总是如此。高级中场(AvMs)、宽中场(WMs)和边后卫(WnBs)的呼吸PE和肌肉PE得分最高。此外,根据比赛位置,比赛对比赛的差异感知比赛用力变异性在呼吸感知用力的12.8%至27.7%之间,在肌肉感知用力的11.5%至25.2%之间。比赛呼吸肌PE的差异因比赛位置而异,显示中后卫(CBs)、WMs和中场球员(CMs)的呼吸肌PE高于呼吸肌PE(p<0.05;ES=-35至.68),但边后卫的呼吸肌比肌肉PE高(p<.05;ES=.35),表现出大幅度的挥杆,以适应比赛位置之间的变化。这些假设证实,对整体PE的解构为某些比赛位置的主观比赛内部负荷提供了更准确的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kinesiology
Kinesiology REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Kinesiology – International Journal of Fundamental and Applied Kinesiology (print ISSN 1331- 1441, online ISSN 1848-638X) publishes twice a year scientific papers and other written material from kinesiology (a scientific discipline which investigates art and science of human movement; in the meaning and scope close to the idiom “sport sciences”) and other adjacent human sciences focused on sport and exercise, primarily from anthropology (biological and cultural alike), medicine, sociology, psychology, natural sciences and mathematics applied to sport in its broadest sense, history, and others. Contributions of high scientific interest, including also results of theoretical analyses and their practical application in physical education, sport, physical recreation and kinesitherapy, are accepted for publication. The following sections define the scope of the journal: Sport and sports activities, Physical education, Recreation/leisure, Kinesiological anthropology, Training methods, Biology of sport and exercise, Sports medicine and physiology of sport, Biomechanics, History of sport and Book reviews with news.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信