Gábor Kurunczi, A. Téglási
{"title":"Solutions and Challenges for Online Meetings of Electoral Bodies","authors":"Gábor Kurunczi, A. Téglási","doi":"10.7206/kp.2080-1084.539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our presentation, we review the procedure and method of meeting the electoral bodies of different (mainly European) countries – in particular the issue of ensuring the publicity and extent to which they can operate online. In addition, we examine in more detail the practice and procedural method of the Hungarian electoral bodies, in particular the National Election Commission. Based on the above, we also outline the possibilities for the further development of Hungarian practice. Our main findings: it is clear that although online meetings of election commissions are still used only in several countries, but the COVID-19 epidemic has highlighted the need to open up to the online space not only in the election process but also in the practice of individual election bodies. The regulations of the Hungarian National Election Commission define the rules of online meetings in great detail. This makes Hungary one of the few EU countries where it is possible to meet by videoconference. In our opinion, this direction will become decisive in the EU countries in the coming years. Moreover, we do not consider it inconceivable that the entire electoral process (includ-ing remote voting) should be digitised, as is the case in Estonia. However, this still requires many steps to be taken by individual countries to increase voter confidence in digitisation. For now, however, we have to be satisfied with one of the positive benefits of the COVID-19 epidemic: the ability to online meetings of election commissions. © 2022 Authors.","PeriodicalId":36398,"journal":{"name":"Krytyka Prawa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krytyka Prawa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
选举机构在线会议的解决方案和挑战
在我们的演讲中,我们回顾了与不同(主要是欧洲)国家的选举机构会面的程序和方法,特别是确保公开性和他们可以在多大程度上在线运作的问题。此外,我们更详细地审查了匈牙利选举机构,特别是国家选举委员会的做法和程序方法。在此基础上,我们还概述了匈牙利实践进一步发展的可能性。我们的主要发现:很明显,尽管选举委员会的在线会议仍仅在几个国家使用,但新冠肺炎疫情突出表明,不仅在选举过程中,而且在个别选举机构的实践中,都需要开放在线空间。匈牙利国家选举委员会的规定非常详细地规定了在线会议的规则。这使匈牙利成为少数几个可以通过视频会议会面的欧盟国家之一。我们认为,这一方向将在未来几年对欧盟国家起决定性作用。此外,我们并不认为整个选举过程(包括远程投票)应该像爱沙尼亚那样数字化是不可想象的。然而,这仍然需要各个国家采取许多措施来提高选民对数字化的信心。然而,就目前而言,我们必须对新冠肺炎疫情的一个积极好处感到满意:能够举行选举委员会的在线会议。©2022作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。