Offending patterns – alone or in a group – and severe conduct problems: secondary analysis of cross-sectional questionnaire data

IF 0.7 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Emma Gilbert, Jane Padmore, I. Norman
{"title":"Offending patterns – alone or in a group – and severe conduct problems: secondary analysis of cross-sectional questionnaire data","authors":"Emma Gilbert, Jane Padmore, I. Norman","doi":"10.1108/jacpr-07-2020-0525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to builds upon the hypothesis that “gang” offenders have greater mental health vulnerabilities than both the offender and the general population. This study aims to determine whether there is a difference between the mental health difficulties experienced by young people who may be committing offenses or who may be non-offenders while exploring the interplay of conduct disorder (CD).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nSecondary data analysis was conducted of a cross-sectional survey of 449 young people in two secondary schools and the data was compared to the scores on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). A diagnosis of CD was given to the respondents scoring “abnormal” for conduct on the SDQ and the findings were compared to the total difficulties score of those without a diagnosis of CD.\n\n\nFindings\nThose committing offenses both alone and within a group setting had significantly higher scores across all domains of the SDQ, indicating the prevalence of inattention and hyperactivity, emotional problems, lower prosocial behaviors and peer problems over other offending groups. The total difficulties scores on the SDQ were significantly higher for the offending groups that had a diagnosis of CD.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe results suggest that offending patterns are included within the screening for CD subtypes and support the need for further research into tailored interventions that involve multi-agency collaboration. This research offers a new approach to the identification of severe CD with callous and unemotional traits by examining offensive behavior.\n","PeriodicalId":45499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jacpr-07-2020-0525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to builds upon the hypothesis that “gang” offenders have greater mental health vulnerabilities than both the offender and the general population. This study aims to determine whether there is a difference between the mental health difficulties experienced by young people who may be committing offenses or who may be non-offenders while exploring the interplay of conduct disorder (CD). Design/methodology/approach Secondary data analysis was conducted of a cross-sectional survey of 449 young people in two secondary schools and the data was compared to the scores on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). A diagnosis of CD was given to the respondents scoring “abnormal” for conduct on the SDQ and the findings were compared to the total difficulties score of those without a diagnosis of CD. Findings Those committing offenses both alone and within a group setting had significantly higher scores across all domains of the SDQ, indicating the prevalence of inattention and hyperactivity, emotional problems, lower prosocial behaviors and peer problems over other offending groups. The total difficulties scores on the SDQ were significantly higher for the offending groups that had a diagnosis of CD. Originality/value The results suggest that offending patterns are included within the screening for CD subtypes and support the need for further research into tailored interventions that involve multi-agency collaboration. This research offers a new approach to the identification of severe CD with callous and unemotional traits by examining offensive behavior.
单独或集体的犯罪模式和严重的行为问题:横断面问卷数据的二次分析
目的本研究旨在建立在一个假设的基础上,即“帮派”罪犯比罪犯和普通人群都有更大的心理健康脆弱性。这项研究的目的是确定在探索行为障碍(CD)的相互作用时,可能正在犯罪或可能未犯罪的年轻人所经历的心理健康困难之间是否存在差异。设计/方法/方法对两所中学的449名年轻人进行了横断面调查,数据为与优势和困难问卷(SDQ)的得分相比。对在SDQ中行为得分为“异常”的受访者进行CD诊断,并将调查结果与未被诊断为CD的受访者的总困难得分进行比较。发现那些单独和在群体内犯罪的人在SDQ的所有领域的得分都明显更高,这表明注意力不集中和多动的普遍性,情绪问题、较低的亲社会行为和同伴问题。对于被诊断为CD的犯罪群体,SDQ的总困难得分明显更高。原始性/价值。结果表明,犯罪模式被纳入CD亚型的筛查范围,并支持对涉及多机构合作的定制干预措施进行进一步研究的必要性。这项研究为通过检查攻击行为来识别具有冷酷无情特征的严重CD提供了一种新的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信