Rules-based natural language processing to extract features of large vessel occlusion and cerebral edema from radiology reports in stroke patients

Zohair Siddiqui , Kunal Bhatia , Aaron Corbin , Rajat Dhar
{"title":"Rules-based natural language processing to extract features of large vessel occlusion and cerebral edema from radiology reports in stroke patients","authors":"Zohair Siddiqui ,&nbsp;Kunal Bhatia ,&nbsp;Aaron Corbin ,&nbsp;Rajat Dhar","doi":"10.1016/j.neuri.2023.100129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke research is limited regarding high-risk patient groups for complications including cerebral edema. Large, well-phenotyped cohorts hold potential insights, but identifying cohorts and manually extracting outcomes is impractical. Natural language processing (NLP) software has previously extracted stroke characteristics from radiology reports, but there has not been an integrated extraction of both LVO classification and acute stroke outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We constructed a rules-based NLP pipeline that extracted presence/location of arterial occlusion and core/penumbral volumes from multimodal CT reports, along with presence of edema and midline shift on follow-up CTs. The algorithm flagged inconsistent reports for manual adjudication. We validated performance over two cohorts and analyzed the associations between NLP-extracted variables and clinical edema outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The algorithm identified occlusions in the development (<span><math><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>577</mn></math></span>) and test cohorts (<span><math><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>442</mn></math></span>) with 94% and 85% recall, increasing to 97% and 93% after review of flagged reports. It could distinguish proximal ICA/M1 from distal occlusions with 96% recall and correctly extracted 98% of core/penumbral volumes. NLP recall was 93% and 86% for identifying edema and midline shift from follow-up reports of 213 patients with ICA/MCA occlusions. NLP-extracted radiographic edema captured 89% of those who developed clinical cerebral edema, which was more likely in those with NLP-identified proximal vs distal occlusions and associated with significantly higher core/penumbral volumes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A rules-based NLP pipeline can accurately identify and phenotype an LVO cohort, yielding clinical associations with stroke research implications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74295,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience informatics","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528623000146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke research is limited regarding high-risk patient groups for complications including cerebral edema. Large, well-phenotyped cohorts hold potential insights, but identifying cohorts and manually extracting outcomes is impractical. Natural language processing (NLP) software has previously extracted stroke characteristics from radiology reports, but there has not been an integrated extraction of both LVO classification and acute stroke outcomes.

Methods

We constructed a rules-based NLP pipeline that extracted presence/location of arterial occlusion and core/penumbral volumes from multimodal CT reports, along with presence of edema and midline shift on follow-up CTs. The algorithm flagged inconsistent reports for manual adjudication. We validated performance over two cohorts and analyzed the associations between NLP-extracted variables and clinical edema outcomes.

Results

The algorithm identified occlusions in the development (n=577) and test cohorts (n=442) with 94% and 85% recall, increasing to 97% and 93% after review of flagged reports. It could distinguish proximal ICA/M1 from distal occlusions with 96% recall and correctly extracted 98% of core/penumbral volumes. NLP recall was 93% and 86% for identifying edema and midline shift from follow-up reports of 213 patients with ICA/MCA occlusions. NLP-extracted radiographic edema captured 89% of those who developed clinical cerebral edema, which was more likely in those with NLP-identified proximal vs distal occlusions and associated with significantly higher core/penumbral volumes.

Conclusion

A rules-based NLP pipeline can accurately identify and phenotype an LVO cohort, yielding clinical associations with stroke research implications.

Abstract Image

基于规则的自然语言处理从脑卒中患者的放射学报告中提取大血管闭塞和脑水肿的特征
背景:大血管闭塞(LVO)卒中的研究对于高危患者群体的并发症(包括脑水肿)是有限的。大型、表型良好的队列具有潜在的见解,但确定队列并手动提取结果是不切实际的。自然语言处理(NLP)软件以前已经从放射学报告中提取卒中特征,但还没有综合提取LVO分类和急性卒中结果。我们构建了一个基于规则的NLP管道,从多模态CT报告中提取动脉闭塞的存在/位置和核心/半影体积,以及随访CT中水肿和中线移位的存在。该算法将不一致的报告标记为人工裁决。我们通过两个队列验证了效果,并分析了nlp提取变量与临床水肿结果之间的关系。结果该算法在开发(n=577)和测试队列(n=442)中识别出闭塞,召回率分别为94%和85%,在审查标记报告后增加到97%和93%。它可以区分近端ICA/M1和远端闭塞,召回率为96%,正确提取98%的核心/半影体积。从213例ICA/MCA闭塞患者的随访报告中,NLP识别水肿和中线移位的召回率分别为93%和86%。nlp提取的x线影像水肿捕获了89%的临床脑水肿患者,这在nlp识别的近端闭塞与远端闭塞患者中更有可能发生,并且与显著更高的核心/半影体积相关。结论基于规则的NLP管道可以准确地识别和表型LVO队列,从而产生与脑卒中研究相关的临床关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience informatics
Neuroscience informatics Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Information Systems, Neurology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Signal Processing, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health Informatics, Clinical Neurology, Pathology and Medical Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信