The Making of a Bolshevik

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
P. Whitewood
{"title":"The Making of a Bolshevik","authors":"P. Whitewood","doi":"10.1353/kri.2022.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decade or so, there has been renewed interest in biographical work in the fields of Russian and Soviet history, described recently in the pages of this journal as a potential “biographical turn.”1 One figure, however, has dominated this emerging trend and notably in books reaching a broader audience: Iosif Stalin.2 It is hardly a surprise that Stalin remains firmly at the center of scholarly attention and public imagination. Although a countless number of biographies exist about the dictator worldwide, Stalin is the significant presence looming over Russia’s past. Responsible for propelling the Soviet Union into modernity but also wreaking havoc with his destructive— and contradictory—behavior, if we are better to understand Soviet and broader 20th-century history, we still need to try and better understand Stalin on a personal level. Twenty years have passed, however, since Stalin’s carefully cultivated archive first partially opened, and much of what material was made accessible can now be found online. Stalin’s motivations, moreover, can be notoriously difficult to interpret, and limitations in accessible materials have led to almost irreconcilable disagreements over key parts of the Stalin era.3 With historians","PeriodicalId":45639,"journal":{"name":"KRITIKA-EXPLORATIONS IN RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KRITIKA-EXPLORATIONS IN RUSSIAN AND EURASIAN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/kri.2022.0034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last decade or so, there has been renewed interest in biographical work in the fields of Russian and Soviet history, described recently in the pages of this journal as a potential “biographical turn.”1 One figure, however, has dominated this emerging trend and notably in books reaching a broader audience: Iosif Stalin.2 It is hardly a surprise that Stalin remains firmly at the center of scholarly attention and public imagination. Although a countless number of biographies exist about the dictator worldwide, Stalin is the significant presence looming over Russia’s past. Responsible for propelling the Soviet Union into modernity but also wreaking havoc with his destructive— and contradictory—behavior, if we are better to understand Soviet and broader 20th-century history, we still need to try and better understand Stalin on a personal level. Twenty years have passed, however, since Stalin’s carefully cultivated archive first partially opened, and much of what material was made accessible can now be found online. Stalin’s motivations, moreover, can be notoriously difficult to interpret, and limitations in accessible materials have led to almost irreconcilable disagreements over key parts of the Stalin era.3 With historians
《布尔什维克的形成
在过去十年左右的时间里,人们对俄罗斯和苏联历史领域的传记工作重新产生了兴趣,最近在本杂志的页面上被描述为潜在的“传记转折”。1然而,有一个数字,在这一新兴趋势中占据主导地位,尤其是在影响更广泛受众的书籍中:《斯大林》。2毫不奇怪,斯大林仍然牢牢地处于学术关注和公众想象的中心。尽管世界各地都有无数关于这位独裁者的传记,但斯大林是笼罩在俄罗斯过去的重要人物。如果我们要更好地理解苏联和更广泛的20世纪历史,我们仍然需要尝试在个人层面上更好地理解斯大林。然而,自从斯大林精心培育的档案首次部分开放以来,20年过去了,许多可以访问的材料现在都可以在网上找到。此外,众所周知,斯大林的动机很难解读,而可获取材料的局限性导致了对斯大林时代关键部分几乎不可调和的分歧。3与历史学家
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: A leading journal of Russian and Eurasian history and culture, Kritika is dedicated to internationalizing the field and making it relevant to a broad interdisciplinary audience. The journal regularly publishes forums, discussions, and special issues; it regularly translates important works by Russian and European scholars into English; and it publishes in every issue in-depth, lengthy review articles, review essays, and reviews of Russian, Eurasian, and European works that are rarely, if ever, reviewed in North American Russian studies journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信