‘ABSOLUTE VALUE AND EXCHANGEABLE VALUE’: A KEY ELEMENT IN RICARDO’S THEORY OF VALUE

Q3 Social Sciences
Manfredi De Leo
{"title":"‘ABSOLUTE VALUE AND EXCHANGEABLE VALUE’: A KEY ELEMENT IN RICARDO’S THEORY OF VALUE","authors":"Manfredi De Leo","doi":"10.1093/CPE/BZX009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article argues that in his last paper Ricardo had arrived at a correct method for determining prices and distribution, which goes beyond the use of the labour theory of value, and therefore raises doubts on the pre-eminent position attributed to the labour theory of value in Ricardo’s thinking after the Essay on Profits, as maintained in Sraffa’s influential interpretation. A reconstruction of the numerical examples developed by Ricardo in that manuscript leads us to maintain that in fact he was determining prices by means of reduction equations, which he had come to view as a valid alternative to the labour theory of value. This appears to be confirmed by Ricardo’s conclusions in the same manuscript: the replacement of the labour theory with the notion of ‘absolute value’, expressing the price in terms of the ‘average commodity’, as provided by the reduction equation. It is also pointed out that Ricardo illustrates his final advance as a transition between two different measures of value, namely from labour embodied to the labour commanded by the commodity conceived as the invariable standard of value, and that in this respect some similarities can be found between Ricardo’s last pages on value and the puzzling passage of Production of Commodities in which Sraffa commutes his standard commodity into the ‘variable quantity of labour’ which the former is able to command.","PeriodicalId":38730,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Political Economy","volume":"36 1","pages":"61-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/CPE/BZX009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CPE/BZX009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article argues that in his last paper Ricardo had arrived at a correct method for determining prices and distribution, which goes beyond the use of the labour theory of value, and therefore raises doubts on the pre-eminent position attributed to the labour theory of value in Ricardo’s thinking after the Essay on Profits, as maintained in Sraffa’s influential interpretation. A reconstruction of the numerical examples developed by Ricardo in that manuscript leads us to maintain that in fact he was determining prices by means of reduction equations, which he had come to view as a valid alternative to the labour theory of value. This appears to be confirmed by Ricardo’s conclusions in the same manuscript: the replacement of the labour theory with the notion of ‘absolute value’, expressing the price in terms of the ‘average commodity’, as provided by the reduction equation. It is also pointed out that Ricardo illustrates his final advance as a transition between two different measures of value, namely from labour embodied to the labour commanded by the commodity conceived as the invariable standard of value, and that in this respect some similarities can be found between Ricardo’s last pages on value and the puzzling passage of Production of Commodities in which Sraffa commutes his standard commodity into the ‘variable quantity of labour’ which the former is able to command.
“绝对价值与交换价值”:李嘉图价值理论的关键要素
本文认为,里卡多在其上一篇论文中提出了一种正确的价格和分配确定方法,这种方法超越了劳动价值论的使用,因此对《利润论》之后的里卡多思想中劳动价值论所具有的卓越地位提出了质疑,正如斯拉法有影响力的解释所保持的那样。对里卡多在该手稿中提出的数字例子的重建使我们坚持认为,事实上,他是通过折减方程来确定价格的,他认为折减方程是劳动价值理论的有效替代方案。里卡多在同一手稿中的结论似乎证实了这一点:用“绝对价值”的概念取代了劳动理论,用“平均商品”来表示价格,正如减少方程所提供的那样。还有人指出,里卡多将他的最终进步描述为两种不同的价值衡量标准之间的转变,即从体现的劳动到被视为不变价值标准的商品所支配的劳动,在这方面,里卡多关于价值的最后几页和《商品生产》中令人困惑的一段话有一些相似之处,在这段话中,斯拉法将他的标准商品转化为前者能够指挥的“可变劳动量”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contributions to Political Economy
Contributions to Political Economy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Contributions to Political Economy provides a forum for the academic discussion of original ideas and arguments drawn from important critical traditions in economic analysis. Articles fall broadly within the lines of thought associated with the work of the Classical political economists, Marx, Keynes, and Sraffa. While the majority of articles are theoretical and historical in emphasis, the journal welcomes articles of a more applied character. It also reviews noteworthy books recently published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信