‘Oioi – Oioi – Iehieh!’ Democracy in Crisis! Aeschylus’ Persians for Contemporary Stages

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
K. M. Schmidt
{"title":"‘Oioi – Oioi – Iehieh!’ Democracy in Crisis! Aeschylus’ Persians for Contemporary Stages","authors":"K. M. Schmidt","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2023.2208014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article attempts a reinterpretation of Aeschylus’ Persians as primarily a warning about the instability of democracy following a major military victory against an overpowering totalitarian enemy. It discusses the historical and our contemporary ideas of the democratic principles of government versus the constant tendency towards a strongman regime. I argue that the play’s underlying philosophy is based on the Heraclitan idea of constant flux, which predates our modern ideas of the relativity of time and space, and the core concept underpinning any democracy that the only constant thing about it is continuous change. A short retrospective of modern productions of The Persians reveals the relationship between history and current events that can or cannot be associated with the play. By treating the thorny issue of translations and adaptations and the temptations of simplistic patriotic or antiwar interpretations of the play, the article also addresses the challenging task of determining what constitutes a just war and why a democracy is necessarily engaged in a continuous defensive battle against the forces of totalitarianism.","PeriodicalId":55962,"journal":{"name":"European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms","volume":"28 1","pages":"595 - 614"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2023.2208014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article attempts a reinterpretation of Aeschylus’ Persians as primarily a warning about the instability of democracy following a major military victory against an overpowering totalitarian enemy. It discusses the historical and our contemporary ideas of the democratic principles of government versus the constant tendency towards a strongman regime. I argue that the play’s underlying philosophy is based on the Heraclitan idea of constant flux, which predates our modern ideas of the relativity of time and space, and the core concept underpinning any democracy that the only constant thing about it is continuous change. A short retrospective of modern productions of The Persians reveals the relationship between history and current events that can or cannot be associated with the play. By treating the thorny issue of translations and adaptations and the temptations of simplistic patriotic or antiwar interpretations of the play, the article also addresses the challenging task of determining what constitutes a just war and why a democracy is necessarily engaged in a continuous defensive battle against the forces of totalitarianism.
“喂——喂——喂!”“危机中的民主!”埃斯库罗斯当代舞台上的波斯人
本文试图重新解释埃斯库罗斯的波斯人,主要是对民主的不稳定的警告,在对强大的极权主义敌人取得重大军事胜利之后。它讨论了历史和我们当代对政府民主原则的看法,以及对强人政权的不断倾向。我认为,这部剧的基本哲学是基于赫拉克利特关于不断变化的思想,这种思想早于我们现代关于时间和空间相对性的思想,以及支撑任何民主的核心概念,即唯一不变的是持续的变化。对《波斯人》现代作品的简短回顾揭示了历史与当前事件之间的关系,这些关系可能与该剧有关,也可能与该剧无关。通过处理翻译和改编的棘手问题,以及对戏剧简单化的爱国或反战解释的诱惑,文章还解决了确定正义战争的构成以及为什么民主必须参与对抗极权主义力量的持续防御战的挑战性任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms
European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信