{"title":"Abandoning Realization and the Transition Tax: Toward a Comprehensive Tax Base","authors":"Henry Ordower","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3273098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 imposed a tax, the “transition tax,” on as much as 31 years of undistributed, accumulated corporate income. This article focus on that transition tax as it evaluates the function and constitutionality of the tax and considers whether the transition tax might serve as a model for addressing the broader problem of deferred income in the United States. The article views the transition tax as joining the expatriation tax and other mark to market inclusion provisions in abandoning any pretext that there is continued vitality in the realization principle as something more compelling than any other longstanding and obsolescing tax principle. Recommending that Congress seize the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act moment and discard the general rule deferring the inclusion of gain in income through a realization requirement in favor of the annual marking to market of all the taxpayer’s property, the article models a general mark to market transition tax after the new transition tax on deferred foreign income. The proposal recommends inclusion of the net gain in taxpayers’ incomes at significantly reduced rates of tax, including one rate for liquid assets and a lower rate for illiquid assets and an opportunity to pay the tax in installments. Following the initial inclusion under this transition tax, gain and loss would be included annually consistent with comprehensive tax base definitions under an accrual system of taxation based on marking to market. Growth or decline in the value of taxpayers’ property would be taken into account income annually. In some instances permitting some taxpayers to defer payment of the tax until disposition of the property may be desirable but the continued deferral might incur an interest charge.","PeriodicalId":51843,"journal":{"name":"Buffalo Law Review","volume":"67 1","pages":"1371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buffalo Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3273098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 imposed a tax, the “transition tax,” on as much as 31 years of undistributed, accumulated corporate income. This article focus on that transition tax as it evaluates the function and constitutionality of the tax and considers whether the transition tax might serve as a model for addressing the broader problem of deferred income in the United States. The article views the transition tax as joining the expatriation tax and other mark to market inclusion provisions in abandoning any pretext that there is continued vitality in the realization principle as something more compelling than any other longstanding and obsolescing tax principle. Recommending that Congress seize the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act moment and discard the general rule deferring the inclusion of gain in income through a realization requirement in favor of the annual marking to market of all the taxpayer’s property, the article models a general mark to market transition tax after the new transition tax on deferred foreign income. The proposal recommends inclusion of the net gain in taxpayers’ incomes at significantly reduced rates of tax, including one rate for liquid assets and a lower rate for illiquid assets and an opportunity to pay the tax in installments. Following the initial inclusion under this transition tax, gain and loss would be included annually consistent with comprehensive tax base definitions under an accrual system of taxation based on marking to market. Growth or decline in the value of taxpayers’ property would be taken into account income annually. In some instances permitting some taxpayers to defer payment of the tax until disposition of the property may be desirable but the continued deferral might incur an interest charge.
2017年的《减税和就业法案》(Tax Cuts and Jobs Act)对长达31年的未分配累积企业收入征收了一项税收,即“过渡税”。本文重点关注过渡税,因为它评估了税收的功能和合宪性,并考虑过渡税是否可以作为解决美国更广泛的递延收入问题的模型。本文认为,过渡税与移居税和其他按市场计价的规定一样,放弃了实现原则具有持续活力的任何借口,因为它比任何其他长期存在和过时的税收原则都更有说服力。建议国会抓住减税和就业法案的时机,放弃通过实现要求推迟纳入收入收益的一般规则,转而支持所有纳税人财产的年度市值计价,文章在递延外国收入的新过渡税之后建立了一般市值计价过渡税。该提案建议将净收益纳入纳税人收入,并大幅降低税率,包括对流动资产实行统一税率,对非流动资产实行较低税率,并提供分期纳税的机会。在最初纳入这种过渡税之后,利得和损失将按照以市场计价的权责发生制税制下的综合税基定义每年纳入。纳税人财产价值的增长或下降将被计入每年的收入。在某些情况下,允许一些纳税人推迟支付税款,直到财产处置可能是可取的,但继续推迟可能会产生利息费用。
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1951, the Buffalo Law Review is a generalist law review that publishes articles by practitioners, professors, and students in all areas of the law. The Buffalo Law Review has a subscription base of well over 600 institutions and individuals. The Buffalo Law Review currently publishes five issues per year with each issue containing approximately four articles and one member-written comment per issue.