Child Welfare and Social Work Education

Q3 Social Sciences
Sandra M. Leotti, Erin P. Sugrue, M. Itzkowitz, K. Williams
{"title":"Child Welfare and Social Work Education","authors":"Sandra M. Leotti, Erin P. Sugrue, M. Itzkowitz, K. Williams","doi":"10.18060/26350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social work has long been involved in child welfare practice. Though lauded as well- intended and admirable work, the profession’s involvement in the child welfare system is fraught with contradictions, ethical tensions, and a legacy of historical trauma and deep mistrust in Black and Native American communities. Challenging this legacy requires an honest look at how schools of social work participate in policies and practices that work to uphold racialized surveillance and forcible family separation. Accordingly, this paper invites readers into a critical conversation regarding social work’s collaboration with child welfare systems via Title IV-E training programs. To these ends, we draw on the conceptual framework of abolition as a useful tool for interrogating and disrupting social work’s relationship to child welfare.","PeriodicalId":7430,"journal":{"name":"Advances in social work","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/26350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social work has long been involved in child welfare practice. Though lauded as well- intended and admirable work, the profession’s involvement in the child welfare system is fraught with contradictions, ethical tensions, and a legacy of historical trauma and deep mistrust in Black and Native American communities. Challenging this legacy requires an honest look at how schools of social work participate in policies and practices that work to uphold racialized surveillance and forcible family separation. Accordingly, this paper invites readers into a critical conversation regarding social work’s collaboration with child welfare systems via Title IV-E training programs. To these ends, we draw on the conceptual framework of abolition as a useful tool for interrogating and disrupting social work’s relationship to child welfare.
儿童福利及社会工作教育
社会工作长期参与儿童福利实践。尽管这是一项用心良好、令人钦佩的工作,但该职业参与儿童福利体系却充满了矛盾、伦理紧张、历史创伤的遗留问题,以及黑人和印第安人社区对儿童福利的深深不信任。挑战这一传统需要诚实地看待社会工作学校如何参与维护种族化监视和强制家庭分离的政策和实践。因此,本文邀请读者通过Title IV-E培训计划就社会工作与儿童福利系统的合作进行批判性对话。为了达到这些目的,我们借鉴了废除的概念框架作为一种有用的工具来询问和破坏社会工作与儿童福利的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in social work
Advances in social work Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信