ANOPAR – Autoaferição não orientada da pressão arterial: estudo metodológico

Q4 Medicine
Glessiande de Oliveira Almeida, F. J. Aidar, Victor Batista Oliveira, Íkaro Daniel Carvalho Barreto, Rebeca Rocha de Almeida, M. Almeida-Santos, J. A. S. B. Filho, Antônio Carlos Sobral Sousa
{"title":"ANOPAR – Autoaferição não orientada da pressão arterial: estudo metodológico","authors":"Glessiande de Oliveira Almeida, F. J. Aidar, Victor Batista Oliveira, Íkaro Daniel Carvalho Barreto, Rebeca Rocha de Almeida, M. Almeida-Santos, J. A. S. B. Filho, Antônio Carlos Sobral Sousa","doi":"10.6063/MOTRICIDADE.22335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We describe the methodology of the MBPPG study in hypertensive patients as well as the association of blood pressure self-measurement (BP) with its control, the presence of anxiety disorders, unplanned visits to urgency and self-medication. This is a cross-sectional observational analytical study in which it is intended to evaluate 1000 volunteers with systemic arterial hypertension followed up on an outpatient basis in public and private hospitals located in Aracaju-Sergipe, Brazil. Data collection will be conducted applying a specific questionnaire for the research; BP control through Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) or an average of measurements in the last three consultations; the self-assessment of anxiety through the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the determination of quality of life through the SF-36. In the statistical analysis, tests will be used for the hypothesis of independence between categorical variables, equality of means, logistic regression, effect sizes Cohen’s D and h, and a significance level of 5%. The results analysis intends to produce information about the impact of the self-measurement of blood pressure, not oriented, of the hypertensive population. With this, it is expected to provide public managers with information that will support more efficient health policies in relation to the practice of self-assessment performed by hypertensive patients.","PeriodicalId":53589,"journal":{"name":"Motricidade","volume":"16 1","pages":"164-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motricidade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6063/MOTRICIDADE.22335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We describe the methodology of the MBPPG study in hypertensive patients as well as the association of blood pressure self-measurement (BP) with its control, the presence of anxiety disorders, unplanned visits to urgency and self-medication. This is a cross-sectional observational analytical study in which it is intended to evaluate 1000 volunteers with systemic arterial hypertension followed up on an outpatient basis in public and private hospitals located in Aracaju-Sergipe, Brazil. Data collection will be conducted applying a specific questionnaire for the research; BP control through Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) or an average of measurements in the last three consultations; the self-assessment of anxiety through the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the determination of quality of life through the SF-36. In the statistical analysis, tests will be used for the hypothesis of independence between categorical variables, equality of means, logistic regression, effect sizes Cohen’s D and h, and a significance level of 5%. The results analysis intends to produce information about the impact of the self-measurement of blood pressure, not oriented, of the hypertensive population. With this, it is expected to provide public managers with information that will support more efficient health policies in relation to the practice of self-assessment performed by hypertensive patients.
ANOPAR–非指导性自我血压测量:方法学研究
我们描述了高血压患者MBPPG研究的方法,以及血压自我测量(BP)与其控制、焦虑症的存在、计划外紧急就诊和自我用药的关系。这是一项横断面观察性分析研究,旨在评估1000名在巴西Aracaju Sergipe公立和私立医院门诊随访的系统性动脉高压志愿者。将采用专门的调查问卷进行数据收集;通过动态血压监测(ABPM)或最近三次咨询中测量值的平均值控制血压;通过状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)对焦虑进行自我评估,通过SF-36确定生活质量。在统计分析中,检验将用于分类变量之间的独立性假设、均值相等、逻辑回归、效应大小Cohen’s D和h以及5%的显著性水平。结果分析旨在产生有关高血压人群血压自我测量的影响的信息,而不是定向的。据此,有望为公共管理人员提供信息,支持与高血压患者自我评估实践相关的更有效的卫生政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Motricidade
Motricidade Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信