Curricular Innovations in Building College Readiness: A Comparative Study

IF 0.3
L. Wariyo, A. Asgedom
{"title":"Curricular Innovations in Building College Readiness: A Comparative Study","authors":"L. Wariyo, A. Asgedom","doi":"10.14288/TCI.V18I1.196101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The responsiveness of education to development is dependent on the extent that the education system prepares the young for the current changing roles of the work environment, requirements, and demands of the world. Accelerating programs are the curricular innovations to prepare students for college academic rigor and expectations. These curricular innovations are compared in terms of their theoretical intents, curriculum, instructor eligibility and training, settings for delivery, student participation, funding, instructional process and assessment. The key objective of these curricular innovations is building college readiness through exposing students to college academic rigor, experience, and expectations. The comparative analysis shows that the International Baccalaureate and Advanced Placement programs highly emphasize building college readiness through the advanced college-level standard curriculum and rigorous teaching-learning process before college while they also badge college readiness. Unlike the International Baccalaureate and Advanced Placement, the Dual Enrollment is highly focused on building college readiness through exposing the students to the college curriculum and teaching-learning environment before college entry while it also badges college readiness. The former Ethiopian Freshman Program curriculum, the current Preparatory for Higher Education curriculum, was moved down to high school with the intent that it prepares students for college academic rigor and experience. However, it is highly focused on building college readiness without exposing students to college experiences and without badging college readiness. Other strengths and weaknesses of these curricular innovations have also been discussed in the review using empirical research findings.","PeriodicalId":40918,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Curriculum Inquiry","volume":"18 1","pages":"24-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Curriculum Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/TCI.V18I1.196101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The responsiveness of education to development is dependent on the extent that the education system prepares the young for the current changing roles of the work environment, requirements, and demands of the world. Accelerating programs are the curricular innovations to prepare students for college academic rigor and expectations. These curricular innovations are compared in terms of their theoretical intents, curriculum, instructor eligibility and training, settings for delivery, student participation, funding, instructional process and assessment. The key objective of these curricular innovations is building college readiness through exposing students to college academic rigor, experience, and expectations. The comparative analysis shows that the International Baccalaureate and Advanced Placement programs highly emphasize building college readiness through the advanced college-level standard curriculum and rigorous teaching-learning process before college while they also badge college readiness. Unlike the International Baccalaureate and Advanced Placement, the Dual Enrollment is highly focused on building college readiness through exposing the students to the college curriculum and teaching-learning environment before college entry while it also badges college readiness. The former Ethiopian Freshman Program curriculum, the current Preparatory for Higher Education curriculum, was moved down to high school with the intent that it prepares students for college academic rigor and experience. However, it is highly focused on building college readiness without exposing students to college experiences and without badging college readiness. Other strengths and weaknesses of these curricular innovations have also been discussed in the review using empirical research findings.
大学准备课程创新:比较研究
教育对发展的反应取决于教育系统在多大程度上为年轻人做好准备,让他们适应当前不断变化的工作环境、要求和世界需求。加速课程是一种课程创新,旨在让学生为大学的学术严谨和期望做好准备。这些课程创新从理论意图、课程设置、教师资格和培训、授课环境、学生参与、资金、教学过程和评估等方面进行了比较。这些课程创新的主要目标是通过让学生了解大学学术的严谨性、经验和期望,为大学做好准备。比较分析表明,国际文凭和高级预科课程高度重视通过先进的大学水平标准课程和严格的大学前教学过程来培养大学准备能力,同时也标记了大学准备能力。与国际学士学位和高级预科不同,双重招生高度重视通过让学生在进入大学之前接触大学课程和教学环境来培养大学准备能力,同时也标志着大学准备能力。前埃塞俄比亚新生项目课程,即目前的高等教育预备课程,被移到了高中,目的是让学生为大学学术严谨和经验做好准备。然而,它高度关注培养大学准备能力,而不让学生接触大学经历,也不标记大学准备能力。本综述还利用实证研究结果讨论了这些课程创新的其他优势和劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transnational Curriculum Inquiry
Transnational Curriculum Inquiry EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信