Characterization and ecological significance of a seed bank from the Upper Pennsylvanian Wise Formation, southwest Virginia

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
P. S. Yehnjong, M. Zavada, Chris Liu
{"title":"Characterization and ecological significance of a seed bank from the Upper Pennsylvanian Wise Formation, southwest Virginia","authors":"P. S. Yehnjong, M. Zavada, Chris Liu","doi":"10.1515/acpa-2017-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Soil seed banks are important to the maintenance and restoration of floras. Extant seed banks exhibit unique characteristics with regard to the distribution of seed size and seed density. Seeds were recovered from the Upper Pennsylvanian Wise Formation in southwest Virginia. Structurally preserved seeds were also examined from coal balls of the Pennsylvanian Pottsville and Allegheny Groups, Ohio. The size distribution of the seeds from the Wise Formation is similar to that of structurally preserved seeds of the Upper Pennsylvanian Pottsville and Allegheny Group coal balls. In contrast, the seed size distributions in extant wetland, grassland, woodland and forest habitats are significantly narrower than that of seeds from the Pennsylvanian seed banks. Larger seeds are less dependent on light for germination, and aid in seedling establishment more than smaller seeds, especially in dense stable forests where disturbance events are rare. Large seed size may contribute to increased seed longevity, which reduces the effect of environmental variability on seed germination and development. The significantly larger size of the Palaeozoic seeds may have imparted an advantage for seedling establishment in the dense Palaeozoic forests. The preponderance of large seeds may be a result of the absence of large seed predators (e.g. herbivorous tetrapods), and may have been an evolutionary strategy to minimize damage to the embryo from a predator population dominated by small invertebrates with chewing or sucking mouthparts. The estimated seed density of 192 seeds/m2 in the Palaeozoic seed bank falls within the range of modern seed banks, but at the lower end of modern seed bank densities in a variety of habitats.","PeriodicalId":39861,"journal":{"name":"Acta Palaeobotanica","volume":"57 1","pages":"165 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Palaeobotanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/acpa-2017-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Soil seed banks are important to the maintenance and restoration of floras. Extant seed banks exhibit unique characteristics with regard to the distribution of seed size and seed density. Seeds were recovered from the Upper Pennsylvanian Wise Formation in southwest Virginia. Structurally preserved seeds were also examined from coal balls of the Pennsylvanian Pottsville and Allegheny Groups, Ohio. The size distribution of the seeds from the Wise Formation is similar to that of structurally preserved seeds of the Upper Pennsylvanian Pottsville and Allegheny Group coal balls. In contrast, the seed size distributions in extant wetland, grassland, woodland and forest habitats are significantly narrower than that of seeds from the Pennsylvanian seed banks. Larger seeds are less dependent on light for germination, and aid in seedling establishment more than smaller seeds, especially in dense stable forests where disturbance events are rare. Large seed size may contribute to increased seed longevity, which reduces the effect of environmental variability on seed germination and development. The significantly larger size of the Palaeozoic seeds may have imparted an advantage for seedling establishment in the dense Palaeozoic forests. The preponderance of large seeds may be a result of the absence of large seed predators (e.g. herbivorous tetrapods), and may have been an evolutionary strategy to minimize damage to the embryo from a predator population dominated by small invertebrates with chewing or sucking mouthparts. The estimated seed density of 192 seeds/m2 in the Palaeozoic seed bank falls within the range of modern seed banks, but at the lower end of modern seed bank densities in a variety of habitats.
维吉尼亚西南部上宾夕法尼亚怀斯地层种子库的特征及其生态意义
摘要土壤种子库对植物区系的维护和恢复具有重要意义。现存种子库在种子大小和密度分布方面表现出独特的特征。种子是从弗吉尼亚州西南部的上宾夕法尼亚怀斯地层中找到的。从宾夕法尼亚州波茨维尔和俄亥俄州阿勒格尼群的煤球中也检查了结构保存的种子。怀斯组的种子大小分布与上宾夕法尼亚州波茨维尔和阿勒格尼群煤球结构保存的种子相似。相比之下,现存湿地、草地、林地和森林栖息地的种子大小分布明显窄于宾夕法尼亚种子库的种子。较大的种子发芽对光的依赖性较小,比较小的种子更有助于幼苗的建立,尤其是在干扰事件很少的茂密稳定的森林中。较大的种子尺寸可能有助于延长种子寿命,从而减少环境变异对种子发芽和发育的影响。古生代种子明显较大,这可能为在茂密的古生代森林中建立幼苗提供了优势。大型种子的优势可能是由于没有大型种子捕食者(如草食性四足动物),也可能是一种进化策略,以最大限度地减少捕食者群体对胚胎的损害,这些捕食者群体主要是有咀嚼或吮吸口器的小型无脊椎动物。古生代种子库中192个种子/m2的估计种子密度属于现代种子库的范围,但在各种生境中处于现代种子库密度的低端。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Palaeobotanica
Acta Palaeobotanica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Palaeobotanica is an international journal edited in English by the W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, since 1960, which publishes original palaeobotanical, palynological, palaeoecological and palaeophytogeographical papers, monographs, review and discussion articles and book reviews. It is the only journal in the Central and Eastern Europe publishing papers from all fields of palaeobotany. The journal is published regularly in one volume per year, with two numbers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信