Stakeholder engagement in the pooled procurement program in Ghana

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kofi Ameyaw Domfeh, N. N. Appiah-Agyekum
{"title":"Stakeholder engagement in the pooled procurement program in Ghana","authors":"Kofi Ameyaw Domfeh, N. N. Appiah-Agyekum","doi":"10.1093/jphsr/rmad006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The article explores stakeholders’ engagement before the implementation of the pooled procurement program (PPP) and the challenges encountered by the National Catholic Health Service (NCHS).\n \n \n \n The article used a qualitative research approach and a multiple case study design to solicit the views of healthcare service providers and policymakers within the NCHS.\n \n \n \n The article revealed that the National Catholic Health Secretariat (the secretariat) advocated through the Ghana Catholic Bishops Conference through the bishop responsible for health. Subsequently, the Diocesan Directors, managers, accountants, suppliers and storekeepers of all health facilities were engaged to understand their respective roles before implementing the PPP. The challenges faced came from all institutions that played a crucial role in the smooth running of the PPP. These institutions were the hospitals, suppliers, Food and Drugs Authority (FDA), National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) and the secretariat. The findings indicated that some managers in the hospitals were not committed to the program. Whereas, some suppliers purposely weakened the position of some other suppliers after awarding tenders by carrying their commodities directly to the hospitals and reducing the price marginally. The challenge from the NHIS perspective was the payment delays. The FDA was not proactive with post-market surveillance to check substandard commodities in the hospitals. However, in the secretariat, the deficiency was the weak systems to monitor real-time activities of the PPP at the hospitals.\n \n \n \n The article suggests that to ensure the right synergies to meet organizational objectives, the NCHS is advised to increasingly focus on identifying and sustaining the PPP by communicating with other stakeholders to achieve their mutual needs. Such a process would allow the more knowledgeable design of resource needs and allocation of scarce resources to their areas of interest.\n","PeriodicalId":16705,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmad006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article explores stakeholders’ engagement before the implementation of the pooled procurement program (PPP) and the challenges encountered by the National Catholic Health Service (NCHS). The article used a qualitative research approach and a multiple case study design to solicit the views of healthcare service providers and policymakers within the NCHS. The article revealed that the National Catholic Health Secretariat (the secretariat) advocated through the Ghana Catholic Bishops Conference through the bishop responsible for health. Subsequently, the Diocesan Directors, managers, accountants, suppliers and storekeepers of all health facilities were engaged to understand their respective roles before implementing the PPP. The challenges faced came from all institutions that played a crucial role in the smooth running of the PPP. These institutions were the hospitals, suppliers, Food and Drugs Authority (FDA), National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) and the secretariat. The findings indicated that some managers in the hospitals were not committed to the program. Whereas, some suppliers purposely weakened the position of some other suppliers after awarding tenders by carrying their commodities directly to the hospitals and reducing the price marginally. The challenge from the NHIS perspective was the payment delays. The FDA was not proactive with post-market surveillance to check substandard commodities in the hospitals. However, in the secretariat, the deficiency was the weak systems to monitor real-time activities of the PPP at the hospitals. The article suggests that to ensure the right synergies to meet organizational objectives, the NCHS is advised to increasingly focus on identifying and sustaining the PPP by communicating with other stakeholders to achieve their mutual needs. Such a process would allow the more knowledgeable design of resource needs and allocation of scarce resources to their areas of interest.
利益相关者参与加纳联合采购计划
本文探讨了在实施集中采购计划(PPP)之前利益相关者的参与以及国家天主教卫生服务(NCHS)遇到的挑战。本文采用定性研究方法和多案例研究设计,征求全国卫生保健中心内医疗保健服务提供者和政策制定者的意见。该条透露,全国天主教卫生秘书处(秘书处)通过加纳天主教主教会议,通过负责卫生事务的主教进行宣传。随后,所有医疗机构的教区主任、经理、会计师、供应商和仓库管理员在实施公私合作伙伴关系之前,都被邀请参与,以了解各自的角色。所面临的挑战来自所有在PPP顺利运行中发挥关键作用的机构。这些机构是医院、供应商、食品和药物管理局(FDA)、国家健康保险计划(NHIS)和秘书处。调查结果表明,医院的一些管理人员并没有致力于该计划。然而,一些供应商在中标后故意削弱其他供应商的地位,将其商品直接运送到医院,并略微降低价格。从NHIS的角度来看,挑战是付款延迟。FDA没有积极主动地进行上市后监督,以检查医院的不合格商品。然而,秘书处的不足之处在于监测医院PPP实时活动的系统薄弱。本文建议,为了确保正确的协同效应以实现组织目标,建议国家卫生中心通过与其他利益相关者沟通以实现他们的共同需求,越来越多地关注识别和维持PPP。这一进程将使他们能够更有知识地设计资源需求,并将稀少的资源分配给他们感兴趣的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信