Comparative analysis of blind detectors in a cluster-based cooperative Spectrum Hole detection

Q4 Engineering
S. I. Ojo, Z. K. Adeyemo, R. O. Omowaiye
{"title":"Comparative analysis of blind detectors in a cluster-based cooperative Spectrum Hole detection","authors":"S. I. Ojo, Z. K. Adeyemo, R. O. Omowaiye","doi":"10.4314/njtd.v20i1.1300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prevention of authorized users from interference determine the accurate detection of Spectrum Hole (SH) is of great importance in a Spectrum Shearing Network (SSN). However, multipath fading and shadowing affect the accurate detection of SH resulting in interference. Cluster-Based Cooperative Spectrum Hole Detection (CBCSHD) used to address this problem depends on detector and number of clusters. Hence, comparative analysis of blind detectors in CBCSHD is carried out to evaluate its performance with various blind detectors and number of clusters. The CBCSHD is carried out using six Cognitive Users (CUs) that jointly carry out detection of SH and each of the CUs performs local sensing using Eigenvalue Detector (EVD), Energy Detector (ED) and Cyclostationary Detector (CD). The CUs form clusters to reduce reporting overhead between CUs. The local sensing results from individual user are combined at the Cluster Head (CH) using majority fusion rule. The performance of each of the detectors in CBCSHD is evaluated using Probability of Detection (PD) and Sensing Time (ST). PD values of 0.7661, 0.7160 and 0.6229 are obtained at SNR of 4 dB for ED, CD and EVD, respectively, while ST values of 3.0707, 3.7163 and 4.0907 s are obtained for ED, CD and EVD, respectively. The results obtained show that ED has the highest detection rate, followed by CD, while EVD shows the worst detection rate.","PeriodicalId":31273,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Technological Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Technological Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/njtd.v20i1.1300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prevention of authorized users from interference determine the accurate detection of Spectrum Hole (SH) is of great importance in a Spectrum Shearing Network (SSN). However, multipath fading and shadowing affect the accurate detection of SH resulting in interference. Cluster-Based Cooperative Spectrum Hole Detection (CBCSHD) used to address this problem depends on detector and number of clusters. Hence, comparative analysis of blind detectors in CBCSHD is carried out to evaluate its performance with various blind detectors and number of clusters. The CBCSHD is carried out using six Cognitive Users (CUs) that jointly carry out detection of SH and each of the CUs performs local sensing using Eigenvalue Detector (EVD), Energy Detector (ED) and Cyclostationary Detector (CD). The CUs form clusters to reduce reporting overhead between CUs. The local sensing results from individual user are combined at the Cluster Head (CH) using majority fusion rule. The performance of each of the detectors in CBCSHD is evaluated using Probability of Detection (PD) and Sensing Time (ST). PD values of 0.7661, 0.7160 and 0.6229 are obtained at SNR of 4 dB for ED, CD and EVD, respectively, while ST values of 3.0707, 3.7163 and 4.0907 s are obtained for ED, CD and EVD, respectively. The results obtained show that ED has the highest detection rate, followed by CD, while EVD shows the worst detection rate.
基于聚类的协同光谱空穴检测盲检测器的比较分析
在频谱剪切网络(SSN)中,防止授权用户的干扰决定了频谱空洞(SH)的准确检测。然而,多径衰落和阴影影响了SH的准确检测,从而导致干扰。基于簇的协同谱孔检测(CBCSHD)用于解决这个问题取决于检测器和簇的数量。因此,对CBCSHD中的盲检测器进行了比较分析,以评估其与各种盲检测器和簇数的性能。CBCSHD是使用六个认知用户(CU)来执行的,它们共同执行SH的检测,并且每个CU使用特征值检测器(EVD)、能量检测器(ED)和循环静止检测器(CD)来执行局部感测。CU形成集群,以减少CU之间的报告开销。使用多数融合规则在簇头(CH)处组合来自单个用户的局部感测结果。使用检测概率(PD)和感测时间(ST)来评估CBCSHD中每个检测器的性能。ED、CD和EVD在4dB的SNR下分别获得0.7661、0.7160和0.6229的PD值,而ED、CD、EVD分别获得3.0707、3.7163和4.0907s的ST值。结果表明,ED的检出率最高,其次是CD,而EVD的检出率最差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Technological Development
Nigerian Journal of Technological Development Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信