Imaging properties of Fe3O4@Au and Fe3O4@Bi hybrid nanocomposites as contrast agents in spectral X-ray computed tomography: A Monte Carlo simulation study

IF 1.4 Q4 NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY
Maryam Sadeghian, A. Mesbahi
{"title":"Imaging properties of Fe3O4@Au and Fe3O4@Bi hybrid nanocomposites as contrast agents in spectral X-ray computed tomography: A Monte Carlo simulation study","authors":"Maryam Sadeghian, A. Mesbahi","doi":"10.22038/NMJ.2021.57220.1588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective(s) In this paper, we evaluated some imaging properties of Fe3O4@Au and Fe3O4@Bi hybrid nanocomposites as contrast agents in spectral CT. For this purpose, we simulated a spectral CT scanner with photon-counting detectors (PCDs) in 6 energy bins by a Monte Carlo simulator.Materials and Methods A cylindrical phantom was designed with a diameter of 8 cm and a height of 10 cm. Fe3O4@Au and Fe3O4@Bi hybrid nanocomposites were designed as a core-shell with a diameter of 80 nm. Simulation results were utilized to reconstruct cross-sectional images through the filtered back-projection (FBP) algorithm in MATLAB software. Signal intensity and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of tested contrast agents were calculated in spectral CT images. Results The results indicated a comparable image quality for Fe3O4@Au and Fe3O4@Bi hybrid nanocomposites at different energy bins. However, in the energy range of 80 to 120 keV (bin 4 and 5), the difference in signal intensity and CNR between these two nanocomposites increased. The maximum signal intensity and CNR for Fe3O4@Au and Fe3O4@Bi were acquired at the highest concentration. The maximum signal intensity for Fe3O4@Au was 144±10 (HU) in the 4th energy bin and for Fe3O4@Bi 162±19 (HU) in the 5th energy bin. Besides, the maximum CNRs of 74±6 and 67.5±9 for Fe3O4@Au in bin 4, while for Fe3O4@Bi in bin 5 were obtained respectively. Conclusion Based on our results, Fe3O4@Au and Fe3O4@Bi hybrid nanocomposites have provided promising results as contrast agents in spectral CT. Fe3O4@Bi nanocomposites are recommended due to their lower price and availability.","PeriodicalId":18933,"journal":{"name":"Nanomedicine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanomedicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/NMJ.2021.57220.1588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective(s) In this paper, we evaluated some imaging properties of Fe3O4@Au and Fe3O4@Bi hybrid nanocomposites as contrast agents in spectral CT. For this purpose, we simulated a spectral CT scanner with photon-counting detectors (PCDs) in 6 energy bins by a Monte Carlo simulator.Materials and Methods A cylindrical phantom was designed with a diameter of 8 cm and a height of 10 cm. Fe3O4@Au and Fe3O4@Bi hybrid nanocomposites were designed as a core-shell with a diameter of 80 nm. Simulation results were utilized to reconstruct cross-sectional images through the filtered back-projection (FBP) algorithm in MATLAB software. Signal intensity and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of tested contrast agents were calculated in spectral CT images. Results The results indicated a comparable image quality for Fe3O4@Au and Fe3O4@Bi hybrid nanocomposites at different energy bins. However, in the energy range of 80 to 120 keV (bin 4 and 5), the difference in signal intensity and CNR between these two nanocomposites increased. The maximum signal intensity and CNR for Fe3O4@Au and Fe3O4@Bi were acquired at the highest concentration. The maximum signal intensity for Fe3O4@Au was 144±10 (HU) in the 4th energy bin and for Fe3O4@Bi 162±19 (HU) in the 5th energy bin. Besides, the maximum CNRs of 74±6 and 67.5±9 for Fe3O4@Au in bin 4, while for Fe3O4@Bi in bin 5 were obtained respectively. Conclusion Based on our results, Fe3O4@Au and Fe3O4@Bi hybrid nanocomposites have provided promising results as contrast agents in spectral CT. Fe3O4@Bi nanocomposites are recommended due to their lower price and availability.
Fe3O4@Au和Fe3O4@Bi混合纳米复合材料作为x射线计算机断层成像造影剂的成像特性:蒙特卡罗模拟研究
目的评价Fe3O4@Au和Fe3O4@Bi混合纳米复合材料作为对比剂在光谱CT中的成像特性。为此,我们利用蒙特卡罗模拟器模拟了6个能量箱中具有光子计数探测器(PCDs)的光谱CT扫描仪。材料与方法设计直径为8 cm,高度为10 cm的圆柱形体。将Fe3O4@Au和Fe3O4@Bi杂化纳米复合材料设计为直径为80 nm的核壳结构。利用仿真结果在MATLAB软件中通过滤波后的反投影(FBP)算法重构截面图像。计算对比剂在光谱CT图像中的信号强度和噪比。结果Fe3O4@Au和Fe3O4@Bi混合纳米复合材料在不同能量仓下的图像质量相当。然而,在80 ~ 120 keV (bin 4和bin 5)的能量范围内,两种纳米复合材料之间的信号强度和CNR差异增大。在浓度最高时,Fe3O4@Au和Fe3O4@Bi的信号强度和CNR最大。第4能量仓Fe3O4@Au的最大信号强度为144±10 (HU),第5能量仓Fe3O4@Bi的最大信号强度为162±19 (HU)。其中,bin 4中Fe3O4@Au的最大cnr为74±6,bin 5中Fe3O4@Bi的最大cnr为67.5±9。结论Fe3O4@Au和Fe3O4@Bi混合纳米复合材料在光谱CT造影剂中具有良好的应用前景。Fe3O4@Bi纳米复合材料由于其较低的价格和可用性而被推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nanomedicine Journal
Nanomedicine Journal NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信