Contemporary Japanese art: between globalization and localization

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS
Eimi Tagore-Erwin
{"title":"Contemporary Japanese art: between globalization and localization","authors":"Eimi Tagore-Erwin","doi":"10.1108/AAM-04-2017-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to identify and analyze the influence that globalization has had on the development of the contemporary Japanese art production. The study also aims to expand the global narrative of Japanese art by introducing concepts behind festivals for revitalization that have been occurring in Japan in recent years.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nGuided by Culture Theorist Nira Yuval-Davies’ approach to the politics of belonging, the paper is situated within cultural studies and considers the development of contemporary art in Japan in relation to the power structures present within the global art market. This analysis draws heavily from the research of art historians Reiko Tomii, Adrian Favell, and Gennifer Weisenfeld, and is complemented by investigative research into the life of Art Director Kitagawa Fram, as well as observational analyses formed by on-site study of the Setouchi Triennale in 2015 and 2016.\n\n\nFindings\nThe paper provides historical insight to the ways that the politics of belonging to the western world has created a limited benchmark for critical discussion about contemporary Japanese art. It suggests that festivals for revitalization in Japan not only are a good source of diversification, but also evidences criticism therein.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nDue to the brevity of this text, readers are encouraged to further investigate the source material for more in-depth understanding of the topics.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe paper implies that art historiography should take a multilateral approach to avoid a western hegemony in the field.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper fulfills a need to reflect on the limited global reception to Japanese art, while also identifying one movement that art historians and theorists may take into account in the future when considering a Japanese art discourse.\n","PeriodicalId":42080,"journal":{"name":"Arts and the Market","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/AAM-04-2017-0008","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts and the Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/AAM-04-2017-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify and analyze the influence that globalization has had on the development of the contemporary Japanese art production. The study also aims to expand the global narrative of Japanese art by introducing concepts behind festivals for revitalization that have been occurring in Japan in recent years. Design/methodology/approach Guided by Culture Theorist Nira Yuval-Davies’ approach to the politics of belonging, the paper is situated within cultural studies and considers the development of contemporary art in Japan in relation to the power structures present within the global art market. This analysis draws heavily from the research of art historians Reiko Tomii, Adrian Favell, and Gennifer Weisenfeld, and is complemented by investigative research into the life of Art Director Kitagawa Fram, as well as observational analyses formed by on-site study of the Setouchi Triennale in 2015 and 2016. Findings The paper provides historical insight to the ways that the politics of belonging to the western world has created a limited benchmark for critical discussion about contemporary Japanese art. It suggests that festivals for revitalization in Japan not only are a good source of diversification, but also evidences criticism therein. Research limitations/implications Due to the brevity of this text, readers are encouraged to further investigate the source material for more in-depth understanding of the topics. Practical implications The paper implies that art historiography should take a multilateral approach to avoid a western hegemony in the field. Originality/value This paper fulfills a need to reflect on the limited global reception to Japanese art, while also identifying one movement that art historians and theorists may take into account in the future when considering a Japanese art discourse.
当代日本艺术:在全球化与本土化之间
本文的目的是识别和分析全球化对日本当代艺术生产发展的影响。该研究还旨在通过介绍近年来在日本出现的振兴节日背后的概念,扩大日本艺术的全球叙事。设计/方法论/方法:在文化理论家Nira Yuval-Davies对政治归属的研究方法的指导下,本文位于文化研究范围内,并考虑了日本当代艺术的发展与全球艺术市场中存在的权力结构的关系。这一分析主要来自艺术史学家Reiko Tomii、Adrian Favell和Gennifer Weisenfeld的研究,并辅以对艺术总监Kitagawa Fram生活的调查研究,以及对2015年和2016年濑户内三年展的现场研究形成的观察性分析。这篇论文提供了历史视角,说明属于西方世界的政治为当代日本艺术的批判性讨论创造了一个有限的基准。这表明,日本振兴的节日不仅是多元化的良好来源,而且也证明了其中的批评。研究限制/意义由于本文的简短,我们鼓励读者进一步调查源材料,以更深入地了解主题。实践意义本文认为,艺术史研究应采取多边的方式,避免西方在该领域的霸权。原创性/价值本文满足了反思全球对日本艺术的有限接受的需要,同时也确定了一个艺术史学家和理论家在考虑日本艺术话语时可能会考虑的运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信