The not-so-hidden partisan politics of community policing: Community police meetings in Buenos Aires, Argentina

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
L. MacColman, Violeta Dikenstein
{"title":"The not-so-hidden partisan politics of community policing: Community police meetings in Buenos Aires, Argentina","authors":"L. MacColman, Violeta Dikenstein","doi":"10.1177/13624806221103848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community policing promises to foster collaboration between police and citizens, strengthen social cohesion, and address the root causes of crime and disorder. In order to understand why it often fails to achieve this, we argue that scholars should recognize community–police meetings as sites of dynamic, multi-scalar political contestation and pay closer attention to the not-so-hidden partisan struggles that shape them. Our empirical analysis focuses on Buenos Aires, Argentina. Based on ethnographic observation of 30 community–police meetings and interviews with 50 politicians, police officers, activists, and everyday citizens, we explain how higher-order partisan contests influenced the dynamics and outcomes of local meetings. We show how these meetings exacerbated social schisms, reified ideological differences between competing parties, and galvanized support for the City Government’s “law and order” policies. Our results suggest that local participation sometimes reinforces the punitive approaches to urban problems that community policing originally aimed to transcend.","PeriodicalId":47813,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Criminology","volume":"27 1","pages":"326 - 347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806221103848","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Community policing promises to foster collaboration between police and citizens, strengthen social cohesion, and address the root causes of crime and disorder. In order to understand why it often fails to achieve this, we argue that scholars should recognize community–police meetings as sites of dynamic, multi-scalar political contestation and pay closer attention to the not-so-hidden partisan struggles that shape them. Our empirical analysis focuses on Buenos Aires, Argentina. Based on ethnographic observation of 30 community–police meetings and interviews with 50 politicians, police officers, activists, and everyday citizens, we explain how higher-order partisan contests influenced the dynamics and outcomes of local meetings. We show how these meetings exacerbated social schisms, reified ideological differences between competing parties, and galvanized support for the City Government’s “law and order” policies. Our results suggest that local participation sometimes reinforces the punitive approaches to urban problems that community policing originally aimed to transcend.
社区警务中不那么隐蔽的党派政治:阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯的社区警察会议
社区警务承诺促进警察和公民之间的合作,加强社会凝聚力,并解决犯罪和混乱的根源。为了理解为什么它经常无法实现这一点,我们认为学者们应该认识到社区警察会议是动态的、多尺度的政治争论的场所,并更加关注塑造它们的不那么隐蔽的党派斗争。我们的实证分析集中在阿根廷的布宜诺斯艾利斯。基于对30次社区警察会议的民族志观察,以及对50名政治家、警察、活动家和普通公民的采访,我们解释了更高级别的党派竞争如何影响地方会议的动态和结果。我们展示了这些会议如何加剧社会分裂,具体化了竞争政党之间的意识形态差异,并激发了对市政府“法律与秩序”政策的支持。我们的研究结果表明,地方参与有时会强化社区警务最初旨在超越的对城市问题的惩罚方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Theoretical Criminology
Theoretical Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Consistently ranked in the top 12 of its category in the Thomson Scientific Journal Citation Reports, Theoretical Criminology is a major interdisciplinary, international, peer reviewed journal for the advancement of the theoretical aspects of criminological knowledge. Theoretical Criminology is concerned with theories, concepts, narratives and myths of crime, criminal behaviour, social deviance, criminal law, morality, justice, social regulation and governance. The journal is committed to renewing general theoretical debate, exploring the interrelation of theory and data in empirical research and advancing the links between criminological analysis and general social, political and cultural theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信