Different Voices on the Child Protection Process

Q2 Social Sciences
Wulf Livingston
{"title":"Different Voices on the Child Protection Process","authors":"Wulf Livingston","doi":"10.1080/09503153.2022.2103947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International social work has many manifestations. These reflect the diversity of contexts and roles in which social workers practice. The profession, whether on the frontline, in the classroom, within the page or among policy dialogue is increasingly aware of a responsibility to ensure that a multiplicity of actors are given voice and lend their perspective to informing what it does. Within this picture, and sometimes all too often, the perception of a social worker remains as someone who is primarily involved in the protection of children. This edition of the journal seeks to fuse these two considerations. In doing so it brings together a set of different voices on the child protection process: children, women, practitioners, students and supervisors. Taken together we have four qualitative articles that provide a rich spectrum take on this most common of social work subjects. It further supports the journal’s own direction of travel of seeking more articles led and written by authors from a diversity of practice backgrounds, as well as from any academic orientation. We have, for example, recently published articles for example from Australia, China, Czech Republic and Northern Ireland, many of these exploring the global complexities of international social work. Our exploration in this issue begins with Katelynn Buchner, Tammy Pearson and Susan Burke’s rich qualitative exploration of five Canadian Indigenous women’s voices regarding their experience of contact with child welfare services at the birth of their child. The authors, led by a thesis student turned practicing social worker, had the explicit aim in their research of providing Indigenous mothers with the opportunity to voice their experiences. As a consequence, the article provides a myriad of challenging messages from the women to the profession. These include experiences of a range of very powerful emotions and many threads of feeling judged and stigmatised within a structurally oppressive system of huge power imbalances. What comes across very strongly is their capacity to be caring mothers despite the challenges of","PeriodicalId":35184,"journal":{"name":"Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2022.2103947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International social work has many manifestations. These reflect the diversity of contexts and roles in which social workers practice. The profession, whether on the frontline, in the classroom, within the page or among policy dialogue is increasingly aware of a responsibility to ensure that a multiplicity of actors are given voice and lend their perspective to informing what it does. Within this picture, and sometimes all too often, the perception of a social worker remains as someone who is primarily involved in the protection of children. This edition of the journal seeks to fuse these two considerations. In doing so it brings together a set of different voices on the child protection process: children, women, practitioners, students and supervisors. Taken together we have four qualitative articles that provide a rich spectrum take on this most common of social work subjects. It further supports the journal’s own direction of travel of seeking more articles led and written by authors from a diversity of practice backgrounds, as well as from any academic orientation. We have, for example, recently published articles for example from Australia, China, Czech Republic and Northern Ireland, many of these exploring the global complexities of international social work. Our exploration in this issue begins with Katelynn Buchner, Tammy Pearson and Susan Burke’s rich qualitative exploration of five Canadian Indigenous women’s voices regarding their experience of contact with child welfare services at the birth of their child. The authors, led by a thesis student turned practicing social worker, had the explicit aim in their research of providing Indigenous mothers with the opportunity to voice their experiences. As a consequence, the article provides a myriad of challenging messages from the women to the profession. These include experiences of a range of very powerful emotions and many threads of feeling judged and stigmatised within a structurally oppressive system of huge power imbalances. What comes across very strongly is their capacity to be caring mothers despite the challenges of
儿童保护进程中的不同声音
国际社会工作有许多表现形式。这些反映了社会工作者实践的背景和角色的多样性。该行业,无论是在前线、课堂上、页面内还是在政策对话中,都越来越意识到有责任确保多个参与者有发言权,并为其所做的工作提供视角。在这种情况下,有时甚至经常会有人认为社会工作者主要参与保护儿童。本期杂志试图将这两方面的考虑融合在一起。在这样做的过程中,它汇集了一系列关于儿童保护过程的不同声音:儿童、妇女、从业者、学生和主管。总之,我们有四篇定性文章,对这一最常见的社会工作主题进行了丰富的分析。它进一步支持了该杂志自己的发展方向,即寻求更多由来自不同实践背景以及任何学术取向的作者领导和撰写的文章。例如,我们最近发表了来自澳大利亚、中国、捷克共和国和北爱尔兰的文章,其中许多文章探讨了国际社会工作的全球复杂性。我们对这一问题的探索始于Katelynn Buchner、Tammy Pearson和Susan Burke对五位加拿大土著妇女关于她们在孩子出生时接触儿童福利服务的经历的丰富的定性探索。作者由一名论文学生领导,后来成为了一名实习社会工作者,他们在研究中的明确目标是为土著母亲提供表达自己经历的机会。因此,这篇文章从女性到这个行业提供了无数具有挑战性的信息。这些经历包括一系列非常强烈的情绪,以及在一个巨大权力失衡的结构性压迫系统中被评判和污名化的许多感觉。令人印象深刻的是,尽管面临以下挑战,她们仍有能力成为有爱心的母亲
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Practice
Practice Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信