Design bond stress parameters for rock anchors in Brisbane

IF 0.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
G. Hackney, M. Sadeghi, Stephanie Neller
{"title":"Design bond stress parameters for rock anchors in Brisbane","authors":"G. Hackney, M. Sadeghi, Stephanie Neller","doi":"10.56295/agj5824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little published information is available on bond stress parameters at the grout-ground interface for the design of ground anchors within Brisbane rocks. In the absence of data, a designer will typically fall back to ‘universal’ correlations with measurable parameters such as Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) or descriptions of rock type to nominate design bond stress values. In doing so, there is often little understanding of the limitations of such correlations or how applicable those correlations are for the rocks encountered within the local region. A study of Proof Test data from testing of sacrificial ground anchors constructed within materials from the Brisbane Tuff and Neranleigh Fernvale Beds Stratigraphic Units for an infrastructure project in Brisbane has been carried out to consider bond stress values at the grout-ground interface. Materials within the bond zone of ground anchors constructed in Brisbane Tuff and Neranleigh Fernvale Beds units have been classified into different rock units based on rock substance strength and Geological Strength Index. Details of anchor construction and testing procedures are presented, together with the adopted approach to test interpretation. Data from Proof Testing of ground anchors bonded into these materials is then interpreted and evaluated for each unit, with relationships developed for each rock type for ultimate and yield bond stress values at the grout-ground interface as a function of rock substance strength (UCS) and rock mass strength (based on Hoek and Brown,2018). For both rock types, grout-ground interface bond stresses increase with rock strength and quality, with better correlations evident based on rock mass strength than for UCS data. Comparisons of the interpreted bond stress relationships based on UCS are made for both rock types to published information for ground anchors and shaft adhesion parameters for cast-in-situ piles. Suggestions are made for amendments to the Proof Anchor test method to reduce the potential for premature termination of the test and consequent underestimation of the bond stress, and to obtain consistency between Proof and Production test methods.","PeriodicalId":43619,"journal":{"name":"Australian Geomechanics Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Geomechanics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56295/agj5824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little published information is available on bond stress parameters at the grout-ground interface for the design of ground anchors within Brisbane rocks. In the absence of data, a designer will typically fall back to ‘universal’ correlations with measurable parameters such as Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) or descriptions of rock type to nominate design bond stress values. In doing so, there is often little understanding of the limitations of such correlations or how applicable those correlations are for the rocks encountered within the local region. A study of Proof Test data from testing of sacrificial ground anchors constructed within materials from the Brisbane Tuff and Neranleigh Fernvale Beds Stratigraphic Units for an infrastructure project in Brisbane has been carried out to consider bond stress values at the grout-ground interface. Materials within the bond zone of ground anchors constructed in Brisbane Tuff and Neranleigh Fernvale Beds units have been classified into different rock units based on rock substance strength and Geological Strength Index. Details of anchor construction and testing procedures are presented, together with the adopted approach to test interpretation. Data from Proof Testing of ground anchors bonded into these materials is then interpreted and evaluated for each unit, with relationships developed for each rock type for ultimate and yield bond stress values at the grout-ground interface as a function of rock substance strength (UCS) and rock mass strength (based on Hoek and Brown,2018). For both rock types, grout-ground interface bond stresses increase with rock strength and quality, with better correlations evident based on rock mass strength than for UCS data. Comparisons of the interpreted bond stress relationships based on UCS are made for both rock types to published information for ground anchors and shaft adhesion parameters for cast-in-situ piles. Suggestions are made for amendments to the Proof Anchor test method to reduce the potential for premature termination of the test and consequent underestimation of the bond stress, and to obtain consistency between Proof and Production test methods.
设计布里斯班锚杆粘结应力参数
在布里斯班岩石中设计地锚时,关于黏结应力参数的资料很少。在缺乏数据的情况下,设计人员通常会退回到与可测量参数(如单轴抗压强度(UCS)或岩石类型描述)的“通用”相关性来指定设计粘结应力值。在这样做的过程中,人们往往很少了解这种相关性的局限性,也很少了解这些相关性对当地地区遇到的岩石的适用程度。在布里斯班的一个基础设施项目中,对在布里斯班凝灰岩和Neranleigh Fernvale床地层单元的材料中建造的牺牲地锚进行了验证测试数据的研究,以考虑浆液-地面界面的粘结应力值。根据岩石物质强度和地质强度指数,将布里斯班凝灰岩和Neranleigh Fernvale床单元地锚粘结区内的物质划分为不同的岩石单元。详细介绍了锚杆施工和测试程序,以及采用的测试解释方法。然后对与这些材料结合的地锚的证明测试数据进行解释和评估,并为每种岩石类型开发出浆液-地面界面的最终和屈服键应力值与岩石物质强度(UCS)和岩体强度的关系(基于Hoek和Brown,2018)。对于这两种岩石类型,浆液-地面界面粘结应力随岩石强度和质量的增加而增加,基于岩体强度的相关性优于UCS数据。将基于UCS的两种岩石类型的解释黏结应力关系与已公布的地锚信息和灌注桩的轴粘着参数进行了比较。对Proof锚杆试验方法提出了修改建议,以减少试验过早终止和由此导致的粘结应力低估的可能性,并使Proof试验方法与Production试验方法保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Geomechanics Journal
Australian Geomechanics Journal ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信