Arendt, Koselleck, and Begreifen: Rethinking Politics and Concepts in Times of Crisis

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Vlasta Jalušič
{"title":"Arendt, Koselleck, and Begreifen: Rethinking Politics and Concepts in Times of Crisis","authors":"Vlasta Jalušič","doi":"10.3986/fv.42.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reinhard Koselleck has long been regarded as a particularly eminent theorist of socio-political concepts, while Hannah Arendt had not been in focus as a conceptual author until recent times. This article explores the common thinking space between Arendt and Koselleck through their thesis about the gap, rupture, crisis, or break in the tradition of political thinking and historical periods and how this is linked to their notion of conceptuality, i.e. Begreifen (understanding). Despite the impression that each of them focused on the one main break between the past and the future, Arendt and Koselleck both studied multiple breaks and crises in the Western political tradition. The article attempts to show how their distinctive thinking and rethinking of political concepts (Begreifen) are related to these breaks through several direct and indirect encounters and how these are both close and apart at the same time. While they have different concepts of politics and the political, their understanding of the breaks in time and crises can be read as complementary, especially considering their concern with returning the responsibility for actions and concepts to the human sphere.","PeriodicalId":41584,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.42.1.05","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reinhard Koselleck has long been regarded as a particularly eminent theorist of socio-political concepts, while Hannah Arendt had not been in focus as a conceptual author until recent times. This article explores the common thinking space between Arendt and Koselleck through their thesis about the gap, rupture, crisis, or break in the tradition of political thinking and historical periods and how this is linked to their notion of conceptuality, i.e. Begreifen (understanding). Despite the impression that each of them focused on the one main break between the past and the future, Arendt and Koselleck both studied multiple breaks and crises in the Western political tradition. The article attempts to show how their distinctive thinking and rethinking of political concepts (Begreifen) are related to these breaks through several direct and indirect encounters and how these are both close and apart at the same time. While they have different concepts of politics and the political, their understanding of the breaks in time and crises can be read as complementary, especially considering their concern with returning the responsibility for actions and concepts to the human sphere.
阿伦特、科塞勒克和贝格雷芬:危机时期的政治与观念反思
莱茵哈德·科塞莱克长期以来一直被认为是一位特别杰出的社会政治概念理论家,而汉娜·阿伦特直到最近才作为概念作家受到关注。本文通过阿伦特和科塞勒克关于政治思维和历史时期传统的鸿沟、破裂、危机或突破的论文,探讨了他们之间的共同思维空间,以及这如何与他们的概念性概念(即理解)联系起来。尽管给人的印象是他们每个人都专注于过去和未来之间的一个主要断裂,但阿伦特和科塞莱克都研究了西方政治传统中的多重断裂和危机。本文试图通过几次直接和间接的接触来展示他们独特的思考和对政治概念的反思(贝格里芬)是如何与这些突破联系在一起的,以及这些突破是如何既紧密又分离的。虽然他们对政治和政治有不同的概念,但他们对时间和危机的理解可以被解读为互补,特别是考虑到他们对将行动和概念的责任归还给人类领域的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK
FILOZOFSKI VESTNIK PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信