Learning How to Learn in Sustainability Transitions Projects: The Potential Contribution of Developmental Evaluation

Andrew S. Mitchell, M. Lemon
{"title":"Learning How to Learn in Sustainability Transitions Projects: The Potential Contribution of Developmental Evaluation","authors":"Andrew S. Mitchell, M. Lemon","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v16i34.531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Community-based sustainability transitions projects are increasingly being considered for their potential as policy delivery vehicles for the UK government Climate Change Act commitments. At the same time, project funders seek reassurances that their investments are relevant in helping communities mitigate, and adapt to, the effects of climate change. Despite this increased pressure, recent research suggests that evaluations of such sustainability transitions projects have, on the one hand variable impacts, or impacts that are of an inadequate scale, duration, or type, or on the other, that project staff lack the capacity or resources to undertake monitoring and evaluation to the degree of rigour expected by policy makers and funders. \nPurpose: This article reports on an extended case study of a fully-funded five year community-based sustainability transitions project in Leicestershire, England. In particular, it reviews the deployment of developmental evaluation (DE) methods in an attempt to capture the project team’s learning about doing community-based sustainability work. \nSetting: A funded community-based sustainability transitions project in a south Leicestershire market town. \nIntervention: Developmental evaluation methods were used to capture project-based learning as a resource for project innovation and adaptation. \nResearch Design: Phronetic case study. \nData Collection and Analysis: Participant-observation, action research, focus and special issue group facilitation. \nFindings: Use of a developmental evaluation method identified key learning points for the project actors; these focused on how the project had adapted to the complexities of the operating environment through innovations in second-order learning or learning how to learn. The paper makes recommendations for the design and funding arrangements of community-based sustainability transitions initiatives and developmental evaluation is endorsed as a viable and promising adjunct to more traditional impact, economic, and process evaluation methodologies. \nKeywords: developmental evaluation; second-order learning; community-based sustainability; phronesis; action research; project design.","PeriodicalId":91909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v16i34.531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Community-based sustainability transitions projects are increasingly being considered for their potential as policy delivery vehicles for the UK government Climate Change Act commitments. At the same time, project funders seek reassurances that their investments are relevant in helping communities mitigate, and adapt to, the effects of climate change. Despite this increased pressure, recent research suggests that evaluations of such sustainability transitions projects have, on the one hand variable impacts, or impacts that are of an inadequate scale, duration, or type, or on the other, that project staff lack the capacity or resources to undertake monitoring and evaluation to the degree of rigour expected by policy makers and funders. Purpose: This article reports on an extended case study of a fully-funded five year community-based sustainability transitions project in Leicestershire, England. In particular, it reviews the deployment of developmental evaluation (DE) methods in an attempt to capture the project team’s learning about doing community-based sustainability work. Setting: A funded community-based sustainability transitions project in a south Leicestershire market town. Intervention: Developmental evaluation methods were used to capture project-based learning as a resource for project innovation and adaptation. Research Design: Phronetic case study. Data Collection and Analysis: Participant-observation, action research, focus and special issue group facilitation. Findings: Use of a developmental evaluation method identified key learning points for the project actors; these focused on how the project had adapted to the complexities of the operating environment through innovations in second-order learning or learning how to learn. The paper makes recommendations for the design and funding arrangements of community-based sustainability transitions initiatives and developmental evaluation is endorsed as a viable and promising adjunct to more traditional impact, economic, and process evaluation methodologies. Keywords: developmental evaluation; second-order learning; community-based sustainability; phronesis; action research; project design.
学习如何在可持续发展转型项目中学习:发展评估的潜在贡献
背景:基于社区的可持续发展转型项目正越来越多地被视为英国政府气候变化法案承诺的政策交付工具。与此同时,项目出资人希望确保他们的投资与帮助社区减轻和适应气候变化的影响有关。尽管这种压力越来越大,但最近的研究表明,对这种可持续性过渡项目的评价一方面具有可变的影响,或影响的规模、持续时间或类型不够,另一方面,项目工作人员缺乏能力或资源,无法按照决策者和资助者所期望的严格程度进行监测和评价。目的:本文报告了一个扩展的案例研究,该研究是在英国莱斯特郡一个全额资助的五年社区可持续发展转型项目。特别地,它审查了发展评价方法的部署,试图捕捉项目小组在做社区可持续发展工作方面的学习。项目背景:南莱斯特郡集镇的一个资助社区可持续发展转型项目。干预:采用发展性评价方法捕捉基于项目的学习作为项目创新和适应的资源。研究设计:语音案例研究。数据收集和分析:参与者观察,行动研究,焦点和特殊问题小组促进。发现:使用发展性评估方法确定了项目参与者的关键学习点;这些问题集中在项目如何通过在二阶学习或学习如何学习方面的创新来适应操作环境的复杂性。该文件对以社区为基础的可持续性过渡倡议的设计和供资安排提出了建议,并赞同发展评价作为更传统的影响、经济和过程评价方法的可行和有希望的辅助方法。关键词:发展性评价;二阶学习;以社区为基础的可持续发展;实践智慧;行动研究;项目设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信