Z. Rezasoltani, Sirous Azizi, S. Najafi, S. Sedighi, Maysam Elahi Movahed, A. Dadarkhah
{"title":"Transcranial direct current stimulation for nonspecific low back pain: double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial","authors":"Z. Rezasoltani, Sirous Azizi, S. Najafi, S. Sedighi, Maysam Elahi Movahed, A. Dadarkhah","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0013.4195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Low back pain is recognized as a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Between 70 and 80% of adults experience at least one occasion of low back pain with duration of 3 months or longer in their lifetime. Aside from the classic treatment methods, there are other new techniques yet to be clinically investigated. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been reported to alleviate pain by affecting the central nervous system. To date only a small number of studies have been published on the effects of tDCS on chronic low back pain. Some of these were pilot studies and others were low-powered in terms of their inference. Therefore the clinical application of tDCS requires further careful evaluation. Objective: To assess the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Materials and methods: We carried out a double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial in a University Hospital. In total 70 people (15 women) with low back pain were randomized to either active or sham stimulation. The primary outcome was intensity of low back pain on the Visual Analog Scale. We also used the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire to evaluate the effects of back pain on daily activities. For the active stimulation group we administered 2 mA tDCS, 20 minutes for each session, once daily, 5 days per week for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. For the sham stimulation group a similar program was followed with no stimulation. Both groups used analgesic medication. Results: Within-group analysis showed that an initial decrease in pain intensity was significant in both groups (both p < 0.001). However, pain reduction became stable only in the active treatment group. There was a significant difference in the pattern of change in mean pain scores in favor of tDCS (p < 0.001). Active treatment also significantly reduced disability scores (all p values < 0.001), whereas participants in the sham treatment group did not experience functional recovery. Mixed ANOVA indicated that the pattern of change in mean scores of disability differed between the two groups throughout the study course, in favor of active stimulation (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Transcranial direct current stimulation is an effective and safe initial treatment for chronic nonspecific low back pain, and the benefits remain for at least several months.","PeriodicalId":35329,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacja Medyczna","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacja Medyczna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.4195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Introduction: Low back pain is recognized as a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Between 70 and 80% of adults experience at least one occasion of low back pain with duration of 3 months or longer in their lifetime. Aside from the classic treatment methods, there are other new techniques yet to be clinically investigated. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been reported to alleviate pain by affecting the central nervous system. To date only a small number of studies have been published on the effects of tDCS on chronic low back pain. Some of these were pilot studies and others were low-powered in terms of their inference. Therefore the clinical application of tDCS requires further careful evaluation. Objective: To assess the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Materials and methods: We carried out a double-blind randomized sham-controlled trial in a University Hospital. In total 70 people (15 women) with low back pain were randomized to either active or sham stimulation. The primary outcome was intensity of low back pain on the Visual Analog Scale. We also used the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire to evaluate the effects of back pain on daily activities. For the active stimulation group we administered 2 mA tDCS, 20 minutes for each session, once daily, 5 days per week for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. For the sham stimulation group a similar program was followed with no stimulation. Both groups used analgesic medication. Results: Within-group analysis showed that an initial decrease in pain intensity was significant in both groups (both p < 0.001). However, pain reduction became stable only in the active treatment group. There was a significant difference in the pattern of change in mean pain scores in favor of tDCS (p < 0.001). Active treatment also significantly reduced disability scores (all p values < 0.001), whereas participants in the sham treatment group did not experience functional recovery. Mixed ANOVA indicated that the pattern of change in mean scores of disability differed between the two groups throughout the study course, in favor of active stimulation (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Transcranial direct current stimulation is an effective and safe initial treatment for chronic nonspecific low back pain, and the benefits remain for at least several months.
引言:腰痛是全世界公认的主要发病原因。70%至80%的成年人一生中至少经历过一次持续时间为3个月或更长的腰痛。除了经典的治疗方法外,还有其他新技术有待临床研究。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)已被报道通过影响中枢神经系统来减轻疼痛。到目前为止,只有少量关于tDCS对慢性腰痛影响的研究发表。其中一些是试点研究,另一些则在推理方面缺乏说服力。因此,tDCS的临床应用需要进一步仔细评估。目的:评价经颅直流电刺激治疗慢性非特异性腰痛的疗效。材料和方法:我们在一所大学医院进行了一项双盲随机假对照试验。总共有70名腰痛患者(15名女性)被随机分为主动或假刺激组。主要结果是视觉模拟量表上的腰痛强度。我们还使用Oswestry残疾问卷来评估背痛对日常活动的影响。对于主动刺激组,我们给药2 mA tDCS,每次20分钟,每天一次,每周5天,持续2周,共10次。对于假刺激组,在没有刺激的情况下遵循类似的程序。两组均使用了镇痛药物。结果:组内分析显示,两组的疼痛强度最初都显著降低(均<0.001)。然而,疼痛减轻只有在积极治疗组才稳定。平均疼痛评分的变化模式有利于tDCS(p<0.001)。积极治疗也显著降低了残疾评分(所有p值均<0.001),而假治疗组的参与者没有经历功能恢复。混合方差分析表明,在整个研究过程中,两组残疾平均得分的变化模式不同,有利于主动刺激(p<0.001)。结论:经颅直流电刺激是治疗慢性非特异性腰痛的有效且安全的初始治疗方法,其益处至少可持续数月。