Brain motor control assessment post intensive whole-body exercise vs. upper body exercise after spinal cord injury

M. Zoghi, M. Galea
{"title":"Brain motor control assessment post intensive whole-body exercise vs. upper body exercise after spinal cord injury","authors":"M. Zoghi, M. Galea","doi":"10.20517/2347-8659.2019.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of voluntary movements in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) post intensive whole-body training vs. upper body training with brain motor control assessment (BMCA). Methods: Twelve neurologically intact participants and 18 patients with SCI participated in this study as part of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. All participants received 12 weeks training (three times per week), which comprised trunk, upper and lower limb exercises and locomotor training and functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycling in whole-body training group and an upper body strength and fitness program for upper body training group. Results: Generalised linear model analysis showed significant effect of the main effect of the Task (P < 0.001) on the similarity index of voluntary movement patterns but not on the other factors or the interactions between them (P > 0.05). Some participants showed significant improvement in muscle strength post 12 weeks training; however, this improvement was not reflected in the pattern of muscle activation which was captured by BMCA. Conclusion: BMCA is a valuable objective assessment tool that could add resolution to the clinical evaluation of patients with SCI post different therapeutic techniques.","PeriodicalId":19129,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/2347-8659.2019.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of voluntary movements in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) post intensive whole-body training vs. upper body training with brain motor control assessment (BMCA). Methods: Twelve neurologically intact participants and 18 patients with SCI participated in this study as part of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. All participants received 12 weeks training (three times per week), which comprised trunk, upper and lower limb exercises and locomotor training and functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycling in whole-body training group and an upper body strength and fitness program for upper body training group. Results: Generalised linear model analysis showed significant effect of the main effect of the Task (P < 0.001) on the similarity index of voluntary movement patterns but not on the other factors or the interactions between them (P > 0.05). Some participants showed significant improvement in muscle strength post 12 weeks training; however, this improvement was not reflected in the pattern of muscle activation which was captured by BMCA. Conclusion: BMCA is a valuable objective assessment tool that could add resolution to the clinical evaluation of patients with SCI post different therapeutic techniques.
脊髓损伤后全身强化运动与上身运动后的脑运动控制评估
目的:本研究的目的是评估脊髓损伤(SCI)患者在高强度全身训练与上肢训练与脑运动控制评估(BMCA)后的自主运动模式。方法:作为多中心随机对照试验的一部分,12名神经系统完整的参与者和18名脊髓损伤患者参与了这项研究。所有参与者均接受为期12周的训练(每周三次),包括躯干、上肢和下肢锻炼、运动训练和功能性电刺激辅助骑自行车,全身性训练组为上肢力量和健身项目。结果:广义线性模型分析显示,任务主效应对自主运动模式相似指数有显著影响(P < 0.001),而对其他因素或它们之间的相互作用没有显著影响(P < 0.05)。一些参与者在12周的训练后肌肉力量有了显著的改善;然而,这种改善并没有反映在BMCA捕获的肌肉激活模式上。结论:BMCA是一种有价值的客观评价工具,可为脊髓损伤患者不同治疗方法后的临床评价提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
348
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信