Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in Europe's Overseas: A comparative analysis of MOVE case studies

IF 1.8 Q3 ECOLOGY
I. Sieber, Miriam Montero-Hidalgo, Jarumi Kato-Huerta, Paula Rendon, F. Santos-Martín, D. Geneletti, A. Gil, E. Trégarot, Erwann Lagabrielle, C. Parelho, M. Arbelo, P. van Beukering, D. Bayley, E. Casas, Sem J. Duijndam, E. Cillaurren, G. David, Aurélie Dourdain, R. Haroun, Jean-Philippe Maréchal, Laura Martín García, F. Otero-Ferrer, Elena Palacios Nieto, Tara Pelembe, Marta Vergílio, Benjamin Burkhard
{"title":"Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in Europe's Overseas: A comparative analysis of MOVE case studies","authors":"I. Sieber, Miriam Montero-Hidalgo, Jarumi Kato-Huerta, Paula Rendon, F. Santos-Martín, D. Geneletti, A. Gil, E. Trégarot, Erwann Lagabrielle, C. Parelho, M. Arbelo, P. van Beukering, D. Bayley, E. Casas, Sem J. Duijndam, E. Cillaurren, G. David, Aurélie Dourdain, R. Haroun, Jean-Philippe Maréchal, Laura Martín García, F. Otero-Ferrer, Elena Palacios Nieto, Tara Pelembe, Marta Vergílio, Benjamin Burkhard","doi":"10.3897/oneeco.7.e87179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) has been widely applied on the European Union (EU) mainland, whereas the EU Overseas entities still bear potential for implementation. This paper presents novel applications of the MAES procedure in the EU Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories (\"EU Overseas\"). Eight case studies from different geographical areas were analysed through a comparative assessment by applying an established framework following key steps in the MAES process, in order to stipulate lessons learned and recommendations for MAES in the EU Overseas. These key steps include the identification of policy questions, stakeholder networks and involvement, application of MAES methods, dissemination and communication and implementation. The case studies were conducted and analysed under the umbrella of the EU MOVE pilot project, including the Azores, the Canary Islands, Saint Martin, French Guiana, Martinique, Reunion Island and the Falkland Islands. Each case study represented different governance, policy and decision-making frameworks towards biodiversity and environmental protection. Case studies predominantly addressed the policy domains of Nature and Biodiversity Conservation and Marine and Maritime Policy. Ecosystem Services (ES) were assessed across a wide range of themes, biomes and scales, focusing on terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystems. Results show that the implementation of the case studies was accompanied by extensive communication and dissemination activities. First success stories were visible, where the MAES exercise led to meaningful uptake of the ES concept to policies and decision-making. Yet, there is still work to be done - major bottlenecks were identified related to the MAES implementation centring around financial resources, training and technical expertise. Addressing these aspects can contribute to an enhanced implementation of MAES in the EU Overseas in the future.","PeriodicalId":36908,"journal":{"name":"One Ecosystem","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Ecosystem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.7.e87179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) has been widely applied on the European Union (EU) mainland, whereas the EU Overseas entities still bear potential for implementation. This paper presents novel applications of the MAES procedure in the EU Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories ("EU Overseas"). Eight case studies from different geographical areas were analysed through a comparative assessment by applying an established framework following key steps in the MAES process, in order to stipulate lessons learned and recommendations for MAES in the EU Overseas. These key steps include the identification of policy questions, stakeholder networks and involvement, application of MAES methods, dissemination and communication and implementation. The case studies were conducted and analysed under the umbrella of the EU MOVE pilot project, including the Azores, the Canary Islands, Saint Martin, French Guiana, Martinique, Reunion Island and the Falkland Islands. Each case study represented different governance, policy and decision-making frameworks towards biodiversity and environmental protection. Case studies predominantly addressed the policy domains of Nature and Biodiversity Conservation and Marine and Maritime Policy. Ecosystem Services (ES) were assessed across a wide range of themes, biomes and scales, focusing on terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystems. Results show that the implementation of the case studies was accompanied by extensive communication and dissemination activities. First success stories were visible, where the MAES exercise led to meaningful uptake of the ES concept to policies and decision-making. Yet, there is still work to be done - major bottlenecks were identified related to the MAES implementation centring around financial resources, training and technical expertise. Addressing these aspects can contribute to an enhanced implementation of MAES in the EU Overseas in the future.
欧洲海外生态系统服务的测绘和评估:MOVE案例研究的比较分析
生态系统及其服务的测绘和评估(MAES)已在欧盟大陆广泛应用,而欧盟海外实体仍有实施的潜力。本文介绍了MAES程序在欧盟最边远地区和海外国家和地区(“欧盟海外”)的新应用。通过比较评估,分析了来自不同地理区域的八个案例研究,在MAES过程的关键步骤之后应用既定框架,以规定欧盟海外MAES的经验教训和建议。这些关键步骤包括确定政策问题、利益相关者网络和参与、MAES方法的应用、传播、沟通和实施。案例研究是在欧盟MOVE试点项目的框架下进行和分析的,包括亚速尔群岛、加那利群岛、圣马丁岛、法属圭亚那、马提尼克岛、留尼汪岛和福克兰群岛。每一个案例研究都代表了针对生物多样性和环境保护的不同治理、政策和决策框架。案例研究主要涉及自然和生物多样性保护以及海洋和海洋政策的政策领域。对生态系统服务进行了广泛的主题、生物群落和规模评估,重点是陆地、沿海和海洋生态系统。结果表明,在实施案例研究的同时,开展了广泛的交流和传播活动。最初的成功案例是显而易见的,MAES活动使ES概念有意义地融入到政策和决策中。然而,仍有工作要做——围绕财政资源、培训和技术专长,发现了与MAES实施有关的主要瓶颈。解决这些问题有助于未来在欧盟海外加强MAES的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
One Ecosystem
One Ecosystem Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信