Education and the Bauhaus (1938)

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
L. Moholy-Nagy
{"title":"Education and the Bauhaus (1938)","authors":"L. Moholy-Nagy","doi":"10.1086/722020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A human being is developed only by the crystallization of the sum total of his experiences. Our present system of education contradicts this axiom by stressing preponderantly a single field of application. Instead of extending our milieu, as the primitive man was forced to do, combining as he did in one person hunter, craftsman, builder, physician, etc., we concern ourselves only with one definite occupation—leaving unused other faculties. Tradition and the voice of authority intimidate man today. He no longer dares to venture into certain fields of experience. He becomes a man of one calling; he no longer has first-hand experience elsewhere. In constant struggle with his instincts, he is overpowered by outside knowledge. His self-assurance is lost. He no longer dares to be his own physician, not even his own eye. The specialists—like members of a powerful secret society—obscure the road to all-sided individual experiences, the possibility for which exists in his normal functions, and the need for which arises from the center of his being. Today, the accent lies on the sharpest possible definition of the single vocation, on the building up of specialized faculties; the “market demand” is the guide. Thus aman becomes a locksmith or a lawyer or an architect or the like (working inside a closed sector of his faculties) and is at best a happy exception if, after he has finished his studies, he strives to widen the field of his calling, if he aspires to expand his special sector. At this point our whole system of education has hitherto been found wanting—notwithstanding all our vocational guidance, psychological testing, measurement of intelligence. Everything functions—and functions","PeriodicalId":41440,"journal":{"name":"Schools-Studies in Education","volume":"19 1","pages":"420 - 428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schools-Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A human being is developed only by the crystallization of the sum total of his experiences. Our present system of education contradicts this axiom by stressing preponderantly a single field of application. Instead of extending our milieu, as the primitive man was forced to do, combining as he did in one person hunter, craftsman, builder, physician, etc., we concern ourselves only with one definite occupation—leaving unused other faculties. Tradition and the voice of authority intimidate man today. He no longer dares to venture into certain fields of experience. He becomes a man of one calling; he no longer has first-hand experience elsewhere. In constant struggle with his instincts, he is overpowered by outside knowledge. His self-assurance is lost. He no longer dares to be his own physician, not even his own eye. The specialists—like members of a powerful secret society—obscure the road to all-sided individual experiences, the possibility for which exists in his normal functions, and the need for which arises from the center of his being. Today, the accent lies on the sharpest possible definition of the single vocation, on the building up of specialized faculties; the “market demand” is the guide. Thus aman becomes a locksmith or a lawyer or an architect or the like (working inside a closed sector of his faculties) and is at best a happy exception if, after he has finished his studies, he strives to widen the field of his calling, if he aspires to expand his special sector. At this point our whole system of education has hitherto been found wanting—notwithstanding all our vocational guidance, psychological testing, measurement of intelligence. Everything functions—and functions
教育与包豪斯(1938)
一个人只有通过他全部经验的结晶才能得到发展。我们目前的教育体系主要强调单一的应用领域,这与这一公理相矛盾。我们没有像原始人被迫做的那样扩大我们的环境,像他在一个人身上所做的那样将猎人、工匠、建筑商、医生等结合在一起,而是只关心一个明确的职业——留下未使用的其他能力。传统和权威的声音恐吓着今天的人类。他再也不敢涉足某些经验领域。他成为了一个有着单一使命的人;他在其他地方不再有第一手经验。在与本能的不断斗争中,他被外界的知识所压倒。他失去了自信。他不再敢做自己的医生,甚至连自己的眼睛都不敢做。专家们——就像一个强大的秘密社会的成员一样——模糊了通往全面个人体验的道路,这种体验的可能性存在于他的正常功能中,而这种体验的需求来自于他的存在中心。今天,重点放在对单一职业最清晰的定义上,放在专业学院的建设上;市场需求是引导。因此,一个人成为了一名锁匠、律师、建筑师或类似的人(在一个封闭的院系内工作),如果在完成学业后,他努力拓宽自己的职业领域,如果他渴望扩大自己的特殊领域,他充其量是一个快乐的例外。在这一点上,尽管我们进行了所有的职业指导、心理测试和智力测量,但我们的整个教育体系迄今为止一直被认为是不足的。所有的功能——以及功能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Schools-Studies in Education
Schools-Studies in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信