The cultural politics of civic pride through Hull UK City of Culture 2017

IF 0.7 Q4 BUSINESS
Michael Howcroft
{"title":"The cultural politics of civic pride through Hull UK City of Culture 2017","authors":"Michael Howcroft","doi":"10.1108/aam-08-2021-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis article explores the cultural politics of civic pride through Hull's year as UK City of Culture (UKCoC) in 2017. It unpicks some of the socio-political meanings and values of civic pride in Hull and critiques the ways in which pride, as an indicator of identity and belonging, was mobilised by UKCoC organisers, funders and city leaders. It argues for more nuanced and critical approaches to the consideration and evaluation of pride through cultural mega events (CMEs) that can take account of pride's multiple forms, meanings and temporalities.Design/methodology/approachA multidimensional, mixed methods approach is taken, incorporating the critical analysis of Hull2017 promotional materials and events and original interviews with a range of stakeholders.FindingsThe desire for socio-economic change and renewed identity has dominated Hull's post-industrial sense of self and is often expressed through the language of pride. This article argues that UKCoC organisers, cognisant of this, crafted and tightly controlled a singular pride narrative to create the feeling of change and legitimise the entrepreneurial re-branding of the city. At the same time, UKCoC organisers overlooked the opportunity to engage with and potentially reactivate the political culture of Hull, which like other “left behind” or “structurally disadvantaged” places, is becoming increasingly anti-political.Originality/valueThrough the case study of a relatively unresearched and under-represented city, this paper contributes to cultural policy literatures concerned with critically assessing the benefits and shortcomings of Cultural Mega Events and to a more specific field concerning Cities of Culture and the political cultures of their host cities. This paper also contributes to an emerging literature on the centrality of pride through the UK's post-Brexit Levelling Up agenda, suggesting that pride in place is becoming figured as a “universal theme” of the neoliberal city script.","PeriodicalId":42080,"journal":{"name":"Arts and the Market","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts and the Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aam-08-2021-0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis article explores the cultural politics of civic pride through Hull's year as UK City of Culture (UKCoC) in 2017. It unpicks some of the socio-political meanings and values of civic pride in Hull and critiques the ways in which pride, as an indicator of identity and belonging, was mobilised by UKCoC organisers, funders and city leaders. It argues for more nuanced and critical approaches to the consideration and evaluation of pride through cultural mega events (CMEs) that can take account of pride's multiple forms, meanings and temporalities.Design/methodology/approachA multidimensional, mixed methods approach is taken, incorporating the critical analysis of Hull2017 promotional materials and events and original interviews with a range of stakeholders.FindingsThe desire for socio-economic change and renewed identity has dominated Hull's post-industrial sense of self and is often expressed through the language of pride. This article argues that UKCoC organisers, cognisant of this, crafted and tightly controlled a singular pride narrative to create the feeling of change and legitimise the entrepreneurial re-branding of the city. At the same time, UKCoC organisers overlooked the opportunity to engage with and potentially reactivate the political culture of Hull, which like other “left behind” or “structurally disadvantaged” places, is becoming increasingly anti-political.Originality/valueThrough the case study of a relatively unresearched and under-represented city, this paper contributes to cultural policy literatures concerned with critically assessing the benefits and shortcomings of Cultural Mega Events and to a more specific field concerning Cities of Culture and the political cultures of their host cities. This paper also contributes to an emerging literature on the centrality of pride through the UK's post-Brexit Levelling Up agenda, suggesting that pride in place is becoming figured as a “universal theme” of the neoliberal city script.
2017年赫尔英国文化之城的公民自豪感的文化政治
本文通过2017年赫尔作为英国文化之都(UKCoC)的一年来探讨公民自豪感的文化政治。它剖析了赫尔市民自豪感的一些社会政治意义和价值观,并批评了作为身份和归属感指标的自豪感被英国奥委会组织者、资助者和城市领导人动员的方式。它主张通过文化大型活动(cme)来考虑和评估自豪感的更细致和批判性的方法,这些活动可以考虑到自豪感的多种形式,意义和时间性。设计/方法/方法采用多维度的混合方法,结合对2017年船体宣传材料和活动的批判性分析以及对一系列利益相关者的原始采访。对社会经济变化和更新身份的渴望主导了赫尔后工业时代的自我意识,并经常通过骄傲的语言表达出来。本文认为,认识到这一点的英国奥委会组织者精心制作并严格控制了一种独特的自豪感叙事,以创造一种变化的感觉,并使这座城市的创业品牌重塑合法化。与此同时,英国奥委会的组织者忽视了与赫尔的政治文化接触并可能重新激活赫尔的政治文化的机会,像其他“落后”或“结构上处于不利地位”的地方一样,赫尔的政治文化正变得越来越反政治。原创性/价值通过对一个相对未被研究和代表性不足的城市的案例研究,本文有助于批判性地评估文化大型活动的好处和缺点的文化政策文献,并有助于更具体地研究文化城市及其主办城市的政治文化。本文还为英国脱欧后的“升级”议程中关于自豪感中心地位的新兴文献做出了贡献,表明现有的自豪感正在成为新自由主义城市剧本的“普遍主题”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信