A Proposed Font Distinguishing Element Categorization for Improvement of the Korean Font Classification System

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Aeri Lee, Jieun Park, Hyojung Yang, Younghun Jung, Dongwhan Kim, Byunghak Ahn
{"title":"A Proposed Font Distinguishing Element Categorization for Improvement of the Korean Font Classification System","authors":"Aeri Lee, Jieun Park, Hyojung Yang, Younghun Jung, Dongwhan Kim, Byunghak Ahn","doi":"10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The advancing font production environment catalyzed the development of diverse typefaces and a convenient environment to use them. However, a major problem is that the current Korean font classification systems and their standards are not reflecting this reality. This is because the current systems fail to provide integrated and organic classification standards due to the present excessively rigid and outdated classification standards, and because of insufficient in-depth studies on standards for the classification of various fonts and how they impact each other. Therefore, as part of a study on the Korean font classification systems that are causing the problems, this study seeks to explore and present the major font classification standards necessary to update the systems and the detailed distinguishing elements associated with these standards. Methods The three current font classification systems were examined to identify their problems and to explore the options for improvement. Then, these classification standards were analyzed to corroborate the font distinguishing features that are used in those classification systems. In the preliminary studies that follow, existing studies were reviewed to find out how thoroughly these studies addressed and discussed these font distinguishing features. The analysis for identifying the distinguishing features of Korean fonts was conducted in four main directions: (1) Analysis of font-related design application requirements; (2) Analysis of font-related copyrights; (3) Literary examination of handwriting analysis; and (4) Analysis of distinguishing characteristics to be considered in creating Korean fonts. (referred to the glyphs user manual) Results Four major classification standards that are the most comprehensive and broadly applicable, have been identified through the analyses on related subjects based on the distinguishing characteristics featured in existing classification systems: the skeleton as the frame; the space related to the distance and size of individual letter; the weight that corresponds to the thickness of strokes; and the shape that is related to font families. The subcategories of these distinguishing characteristics include: Frame (length of stroke,","PeriodicalId":52137,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Design Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The advancing font production environment catalyzed the development of diverse typefaces and a convenient environment to use them. However, a major problem is that the current Korean font classification systems and their standards are not reflecting this reality. This is because the current systems fail to provide integrated and organic classification standards due to the present excessively rigid and outdated classification standards, and because of insufficient in-depth studies on standards for the classification of various fonts and how they impact each other. Therefore, as part of a study on the Korean font classification systems that are causing the problems, this study seeks to explore and present the major font classification standards necessary to update the systems and the detailed distinguishing elements associated with these standards. Methods The three current font classification systems were examined to identify their problems and to explore the options for improvement. Then, these classification standards were analyzed to corroborate the font distinguishing features that are used in those classification systems. In the preliminary studies that follow, existing studies were reviewed to find out how thoroughly these studies addressed and discussed these font distinguishing features. The analysis for identifying the distinguishing features of Korean fonts was conducted in four main directions: (1) Analysis of font-related design application requirements; (2) Analysis of font-related copyrights; (3) Literary examination of handwriting analysis; and (4) Analysis of distinguishing characteristics to be considered in creating Korean fonts. (referred to the glyphs user manual) Results Four major classification standards that are the most comprehensive and broadly applicable, have been identified through the analyses on related subjects based on the distinguishing characteristics featured in existing classification systems: the skeleton as the frame; the space related to the distance and size of individual letter; the weight that corresponds to the thickness of strokes; and the shape that is related to font families. The subcategories of these distinguishing characteristics include: Frame (length of stroke,
一种改进韩文字体分类系统的字体区分元素分类方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Design Research
Archives of Design Research Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Archives of Design Research (ADR) is an international journal publishing original research in the field of design, including industrial design, visual communication design, interaction design, space design, and service design. It also invites research outcomes from design-related interdisciplinary fields such as the humanities, arts, technology, society and business. It is an open-access journal, publishing four issues per year. Currently papers are published in both English and Korean with an English abstract. ADR aims to build a strong foundation of knowledge in design through the introduction of basic, applied and clinical research. ADR serves as a venue and platform to archive and transfer fundamental design theories, methods, tools and cases. Research areas covered in the journal include: -Design Theory and its Methodology -Design Philosophy, Ethics, Values, and Issues -Design Education -Design Management and Strategy -Sustainability, Culture, History, and Societal Design -Human Behaviors, Perception, and Emotion -Semantics, Aesthetics and Experience in Design -Interaction and Interface Design -Design Tools and New Media -Universal Design/Inclusive Design -Design Creativity -Design Projects and Case Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信