Pious Mobilities: Jewish Pilgrimage to Uman During the Pandemic

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rachel Z. Feldman
{"title":"Pious Mobilities: Jewish Pilgrimage to Uman During the Pandemic","authors":"Rachel Z. Feldman","doi":"10.1353/sho.2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines the Breslover Hasidim who attempted their annual pilgrimage to Uman during the COVID-19 pandemic. Following the Ukrainian border closure in August 2020, which was supported by the State of Israel, thousands of Breslovers were stranded in airports, land borders, and even imprisoned in the weeks leading up to the Jewish New Year. This research contributes to an emerging scholarly literature on religion and COVID-19, challenging the religion and science \"conflict thesis,\" as interviews revealed that the choice of Breslovers to ignore public health directives stemmed less from a disbelief in science than from a conflict between state and religious authority. Pious mobilities emerge, I argue, when secular logics fail to contain and properly modify religious actors. The choice to travel to Uman was made according to a Breslover moral universe as informants turned to the spiritual tools and teachings of Rebbe Nachman to guide their decisions, especially his notion of ratzon [willpower], engaging in a form of pious mobility that attempted to transcend nation-state borders. Pious mobilities not only challenged public health initiatives in 2020, but as I demonstrate in the ethnography, Breslovers' insistence on reaching Uman simultaneously threatened the cooptation of Breslov Hasidim within a Zionist narrative, reigniting a debate over the relocation of Rebbe Nachman's remains to Israel. By ethnographically examining moments of conflict between religious groups and state officials managing the pandemic, we might better inform future public health policies and the messaging aimed at religious populations including ultra-Orthodox Jews.","PeriodicalId":21809,"journal":{"name":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"107 - 132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sho.2022.0005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:This article examines the Breslover Hasidim who attempted their annual pilgrimage to Uman during the COVID-19 pandemic. Following the Ukrainian border closure in August 2020, which was supported by the State of Israel, thousands of Breslovers were stranded in airports, land borders, and even imprisoned in the weeks leading up to the Jewish New Year. This research contributes to an emerging scholarly literature on religion and COVID-19, challenging the religion and science "conflict thesis," as interviews revealed that the choice of Breslovers to ignore public health directives stemmed less from a disbelief in science than from a conflict between state and religious authority. Pious mobilities emerge, I argue, when secular logics fail to contain and properly modify religious actors. The choice to travel to Uman was made according to a Breslover moral universe as informants turned to the spiritual tools and teachings of Rebbe Nachman to guide their decisions, especially his notion of ratzon [willpower], engaging in a form of pious mobility that attempted to transcend nation-state borders. Pious mobilities not only challenged public health initiatives in 2020, but as I demonstrate in the ethnography, Breslovers' insistence on reaching Uman simultaneously threatened the cooptation of Breslov Hasidim within a Zionist narrative, reigniting a debate over the relocation of Rebbe Nachman's remains to Israel. By ethnographically examining moments of conflict between religious groups and state officials managing the pandemic, we might better inform future public health policies and the messaging aimed at religious populations including ultra-Orthodox Jews.
虔诚的流动:大流行期间犹太人对人类的朝圣
摘要:本文考察了在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间试图进行年度人类朝圣的Breslover Hasidim。在以色列国的支持下,乌克兰边境于2020年8月关闭,在犹太新年前的几周内,成千上万的布鲁塞尔人被困在机场、陆地边界,甚至被监禁。这项研究为宗教和COVID-19的新兴学术文献做出了贡献,挑战了宗教和科学的“冲突论点”,因为采访显示,英国人选择忽视公共卫生指令的原因与其说是对科学的不信任,不如说是国家与宗教权威之间的冲突。我认为,当世俗逻辑无法遏制和适当地修改宗教行为者时,虔诚的流动就会出现。前往人类的选择是根据布雷斯洛弗的道德世界做出的,因为线人转向拉比·纳赫曼的精神工具和教义来指导他们的决定,尤其是他的ratzon[意志力]的概念,参与一种试图超越民族国家边界的虔诚流动形式。虔诚的流动不仅挑战了2020年的公共卫生倡议,而且正如我在民族志中所展示的那样,布雷斯洛夫人坚持要到达人类,同时威胁到布雷斯洛夫·哈西丁在犹太复国主义叙事中的合作,重新点燃了关于将拉比·纳赫曼的遗体重新安置到以色列的辩论。通过民族志研究宗教团体与管理疫情的国家官员之间的冲突时刻,我们可能会更好地为未来的公共卫生政策和针对宗教人群(包括极端正统派犹太人)的信息提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信