{"title":"Statistical Evaluation and Prediction of Financial Time Series Using Hybrid Regression Prediction Models","authors":"Dr. M. Durairaj, B. H. K. Mohan","doi":"10.18201/ijisae.2021473645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Financial time series are chaotic by nature, which makes prediction difficult and complicated. This research employs the new hybrid model for the prediction of FTS which comprises Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Polynomial Regression (PR), and Chaos Theory. First of all, FTS is tested for the presence of chaos, in this hybrid model. Later, using Chaos Theory, the time series is modelled with the chaos existence. The model time series will be entered in LSTM for initial forecasts. The sequence of errors derived from LSTM forecasts is PR appropriate for error predictions. Error forecasts and original model forecasts are applied to produce the final hybrid model forecasts. Performance testing of the hybrid model (Chaos+LSTM+PR) is conducted using three categories namely foreign exchange, commodity price and stock-market indices. The hybrid model proposed in this study, in compliance with MSE, Dstat and Theil’s U, is proved superior to the individual models like ARIMA, Prophet, LSTM and Chaos+LSTM. The execution of these various hybrid proposed methods is done mainly using Python, additionally, the authors used Gretl® and R for some methods respectively. Ultimately, the final result of this hybrid model describes with a better result than the existing prediction models and it is proved using various types of FTS like Foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, and stock market indices respectively. Hence, the result shows that the proposed hybrid models of Chaos+LSTM+PR achieved with better prediction rate than the existing models on the nine datasets executed.","PeriodicalId":14067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18201/ijisae.2021473645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
: Financial time series are chaotic by nature, which makes prediction difficult and complicated. This research employs the new hybrid model for the prediction of FTS which comprises Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Polynomial Regression (PR), and Chaos Theory. First of all, FTS is tested for the presence of chaos, in this hybrid model. Later, using Chaos Theory, the time series is modelled with the chaos existence. The model time series will be entered in LSTM for initial forecasts. The sequence of errors derived from LSTM forecasts is PR appropriate for error predictions. Error forecasts and original model forecasts are applied to produce the final hybrid model forecasts. Performance testing of the hybrid model (Chaos+LSTM+PR) is conducted using three categories namely foreign exchange, commodity price and stock-market indices. The hybrid model proposed in this study, in compliance with MSE, Dstat and Theil’s U, is proved superior to the individual models like ARIMA, Prophet, LSTM and Chaos+LSTM. The execution of these various hybrid proposed methods is done mainly using Python, additionally, the authors used Gretl® and R for some methods respectively. Ultimately, the final result of this hybrid model describes with a better result than the existing prediction models and it is proved using various types of FTS like Foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, and stock market indices respectively. Hence, the result shows that the proposed hybrid models of Chaos+LSTM+PR achieved with better prediction rate than the existing models on the nine datasets executed.