Mortality at a Portuguese Internal Medicine Service: Is Patient Allocation aDeterminant Factor?

Luciana Sousa, Ana Rita Marques, Inês Burmester, I. Apolinário, I. Br, Ao
{"title":"Mortality at a Portuguese Internal Medicine Service: Is Patient Allocation aDeterminant Factor?","authors":"Luciana Sousa, Ana Rita Marques, Inês Burmester, I. Apolinário, I. Br, Ao","doi":"10.4172/2165-7386.1000306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To verify if patient’s allocation by different wards is a determinant factor of mortality risk. \nDesign: Retrospective longitudinal study, using individual patient data from Internal Medicine Service in Hospital \n de Braga, Portugal. \nSetting: From 1st to 31th January 2015. \nParticipants were eligible to our study all patients admitted do Internal Medical care, who hadn’t been transferred \n from different specialty’s wards during hospitalization or remained at Intermediate Care Unit in Emergency Room \n more than 24 hours. \nMain outcome measures: Patients admitted to Internal Medicine’s wards and those admitted on other specialty’s \n wards, were compared for all-cause mortality, 2nd day mortality means and time to death. Analyses using t-student \n test and χ2 test (SPSS Statistics 22.0). \nResults: A total of 319 patients were included in our study, 49.5% (158) were admitted to our medical wards and \n 50.5% (161) were admitted to a different specialty ward. There were respectively 16.5% (26) and 18.6% (30) total \n deaths and 3.8% (1) and 23.3% (7) 2nd day mortality. We also find that Internal Medicine ward time to death was \n 12.0 days and other inpatient ward time to death was 6.13 days. There was no statistically significant difference \n between groups for all-cause mortality (t(317)=-0.510; p=0.611; d=0.07), but for 2nd day mortality and time to death \n we found a statistic significant difference (t(44)=2.11; p=0.04; d=-0.56) and (t(37.2)=3.32; p-value=0.002; d=0.92) \n respectively. \nConclusions: The present study highlight “patient allocation” as a determinant factor for early mortality risk. \n Further research is needed to understand which morbidity and mortality factors are associated with these findings.","PeriodicalId":91127,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative care & medicine","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative care & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7386.1000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To verify if patient’s allocation by different wards is a determinant factor of mortality risk. Design: Retrospective longitudinal study, using individual patient data from Internal Medicine Service in Hospital de Braga, Portugal. Setting: From 1st to 31th January 2015. Participants were eligible to our study all patients admitted do Internal Medical care, who hadn’t been transferred from different specialty’s wards during hospitalization or remained at Intermediate Care Unit in Emergency Room more than 24 hours. Main outcome measures: Patients admitted to Internal Medicine’s wards and those admitted on other specialty’s wards, were compared for all-cause mortality, 2nd day mortality means and time to death. Analyses using t-student test and χ2 test (SPSS Statistics 22.0). Results: A total of 319 patients were included in our study, 49.5% (158) were admitted to our medical wards and 50.5% (161) were admitted to a different specialty ward. There were respectively 16.5% (26) and 18.6% (30) total deaths and 3.8% (1) and 23.3% (7) 2nd day mortality. We also find that Internal Medicine ward time to death was 12.0 days and other inpatient ward time to death was 6.13 days. There was no statistically significant difference between groups for all-cause mortality (t(317)=-0.510; p=0.611; d=0.07), but for 2nd day mortality and time to death we found a statistic significant difference (t(44)=2.11; p=0.04; d=-0.56) and (t(37.2)=3.32; p-value=0.002; d=0.92) respectively. Conclusions: The present study highlight “patient allocation” as a determinant factor for early mortality risk. Further research is needed to understand which morbidity and mortality factors are associated with these findings.
葡萄牙内科服务的死亡率:病人分配是决定因素吗?
目的:验证患者在不同病房的分配是否是死亡风险的决定因素。设计:回顾性纵向研究,使用来自葡萄牙布拉加医院内科的个体患者数据。时间:2015年1月1日- 31日。所有接受内科护理的住院患者,在住院期间没有从不同的专科病房转到急诊室的中级护理病房,或在急诊室停留超过24小时,都有资格参加我们的研究。主要观察指标:比较内科病房和其他专科病房的患者全因死亡率、第2天死亡率和死亡时间。分析采用t-student检验和χ2检验(SPSS Statistics 22.0)。结果:本研究共纳入319例患者,其中49.5%(158例)入住内科病房,50.5%(161例)入住其他专科病房。总死亡率分别为16.5%(26例)和18.6%(30例),第2天死亡率分别为3.8%(1例)和23.3%(7例)。内科病房至死亡时间为12.0天,其他住院病房至死亡时间为6.13天。两组间全因死亡率无统计学差异(t(317)=-0.510;p = 0.611;D =0.07),但第2天死亡率和死亡时间差异有统计学意义(t(44)=2.11;p = 0.04;D =-0.56), (t(37.2)=3.32;假定值= 0.002;d = 0.92)。结论:本研究强调“患者分配”是早期死亡风险的决定因素。需要进一步研究以了解哪些发病率和死亡率因素与这些发现有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书