Discussion of the site visit strategy of Institutional Review Board

Li Hongwu, Hao Chunyi, Zhang Lei, Lu Ting, Zhou Shunlian, Li Jie
{"title":"Discussion of the site visit strategy of Institutional Review Board","authors":"Li Hongwu, Hao Chunyi, Zhang Lei, Lu Ting, Zhou Shunlian, Li Jie","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo discuss appropriate strategies of site visits in ethical committees, to enhance the supervision of clinical trials effectively, and standardize the implementation of clinical research. \n \n \nMethods \nIn consideration of the lack of detailed normative description of site visit in ethical guidelines and relevant articles, as well as the varying degrees of implementation and understanding of site visits among different ethical committees. This article discussed the procedures, contents and considerations of site visit based on the analysis of numerous site visits cases conducted. \n \n \nResults \nSite visit is one of the crucial procedures to more comprehensive, in-depth and truly understanding of the implementation of clinical trials. It is helpful to help sponsors/investigators enhance awareness and compliance with the good clinical practice. It also helps to correct problems timely during the implementation process to assure the standardized implementation of follow-up studies, and finally, effectively protect the rights and interests and safety of subjects. \n \n \nConclusions \nStandardized and efficient site visit strategy of the ethical committee is one of the important regulatory strategies in the implementation of clinical trials and is an effective supplement to the regular review of ethical materials. \n \n \nKey words: \nInstitutional Review Board/Ethics Committee; Continual review; Site visits; Review strategy; Clinical trial supervision","PeriodicalId":59555,"journal":{"name":"中华医学科研管理杂志","volume":"32 1","pages":"246-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学科研管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.04.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To discuss appropriate strategies of site visits in ethical committees, to enhance the supervision of clinical trials effectively, and standardize the implementation of clinical research. Methods In consideration of the lack of detailed normative description of site visit in ethical guidelines and relevant articles, as well as the varying degrees of implementation and understanding of site visits among different ethical committees. This article discussed the procedures, contents and considerations of site visit based on the analysis of numerous site visits cases conducted. Results Site visit is one of the crucial procedures to more comprehensive, in-depth and truly understanding of the implementation of clinical trials. It is helpful to help sponsors/investigators enhance awareness and compliance with the good clinical practice. It also helps to correct problems timely during the implementation process to assure the standardized implementation of follow-up studies, and finally, effectively protect the rights and interests and safety of subjects. Conclusions Standardized and efficient site visit strategy of the ethical committee is one of the important regulatory strategies in the implementation of clinical trials and is an effective supplement to the regular review of ethical materials. Key words: Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee; Continual review; Site visits; Review strategy; Clinical trial supervision
论机构审查委员会的实地考察策略
目的探讨伦理委员会现场访问的适当策略,有效加强对临床试验的监督,规范临床研究的实施。方法考虑到伦理指南和相关文章中对现场访问缺乏详细规范的描述,以及不同伦理委员会对现场访问的执行和理解程度不同。本文通过对大量实地考察案例的分析,探讨了实地考察的程序、内容和注意事项。结果现场访问是更全面、深入、真实地了解临床试验实施情况的关键环节之一。这有助于帮助申办者/研究者提高对良好临床规范的认识和遵守。有助于及时纠正实施过程中出现的问题,保证后续研究的规范化实施,最终有效保护受试者的权益和安全。结论规范、高效的伦理委员会现场访问策略是临床试验实施过程中重要的监管策略之一,是对伦理材料定期审查的有效补充。关键词:院校审查委员会/伦理委员会;持续审查;网站访问;复习策略;临床试验监督
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3322
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信