Valuing and supporting the complex writing processes of emergent writers

IF 1.3 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Melinda Zurcher, Angela J. Stefanski
{"title":"Valuing and supporting the complex writing processes of emergent writers","authors":"Melinda Zurcher, Angela J. Stefanski","doi":"10.1177/14687984221123709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This collective case study sought to investigate the distinctive writing processes and productions of young writers within the space of a writers’ workshop. Based on video-taped observations, fieldnotes, writing samples, and teacher and student interviews, a description of preschool students’ writing processes began to unfold. Some might consider these preschool writing processes to be necessary stepping stones to more conventional writing, but this study makes clear the students already engaged in complex writing processes that may have distinct, valuable qualities to be encouraged and supported. The following research questions guided the data collection and analysis for this study: “How do preschool students create texts within a writers’ workshop?” and “How do these processes differ from past descriptions of the writing process?” These questions are significant, because much of the literature focuses on the writing processes of older students or specific aspects of the emergent writing process (e.g., rehearsal, transcription, dialogue), but this study attempted to describe preschool writing processes as a whole and then identify the dimensions distinctive to these early writers. The data collected in this study highlighted three tightly interconnected themes that reflected aspects of preschool writing processes: the use of illustrations to direct the story, play within writing, and the socialization of emergent authoring. All of these themes underscore how students were writing “in the moment” and creating a multimodal production. By valuing this entire production rather than only the finished written product, young students can view themselves as authors and take on that role.","PeriodicalId":47033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984221123709","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This collective case study sought to investigate the distinctive writing processes and productions of young writers within the space of a writers’ workshop. Based on video-taped observations, fieldnotes, writing samples, and teacher and student interviews, a description of preschool students’ writing processes began to unfold. Some might consider these preschool writing processes to be necessary stepping stones to more conventional writing, but this study makes clear the students already engaged in complex writing processes that may have distinct, valuable qualities to be encouraged and supported. The following research questions guided the data collection and analysis for this study: “How do preschool students create texts within a writers’ workshop?” and “How do these processes differ from past descriptions of the writing process?” These questions are significant, because much of the literature focuses on the writing processes of older students or specific aspects of the emergent writing process (e.g., rehearsal, transcription, dialogue), but this study attempted to describe preschool writing processes as a whole and then identify the dimensions distinctive to these early writers. The data collected in this study highlighted three tightly interconnected themes that reflected aspects of preschool writing processes: the use of illustrations to direct the story, play within writing, and the socialization of emergent authoring. All of these themes underscore how students were writing “in the moment” and creating a multimodal production. By valuing this entire production rather than only the finished written product, young students can view themselves as authors and take on that role.
重视和支持新兴作家复杂的写作过程
这项集体案例研究试图在作家研讨会的空间内调查年轻作家独特的写作过程和作品。基于录像观察、现场笔记、写作样本以及教师和学生访谈,对学前学生写作过程的描述开始展开。有些人可能认为这些学前写作过程是更传统写作的必要垫脚石,但这项研究表明,已经参与复杂写作过程的学生可能具有值得鼓励和支持的独特、有价值的品质。以下研究问题指导了本研究的数据收集和分析:“学龄前学生如何在作家研讨会中创作文本?”和“这些过程与过去对写作过程的描述有何不同?”这些问题意义重大,因为大部分文献都关注年长学生的写作过程或新兴写作过程的特定方面(如排练、转录、对话),但本研究试图将学前写作过程描述为一个整体,然后确定这些早期作家所特有的维度。这项研究中收集的数据强调了三个紧密相连的主题,这些主题反映了学前写作过程的各个方面:使用插图来指导故事、在写作中发挥作用,以及新兴创作的社会化。所有这些主题都强调了学生们是如何“当下”写作和创造多模式作品的。通过重视整个作品,而不仅仅是最终的书面作品,年轻学生可以将自己视为作者并扮演这个角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Journal of Early Childhood Literacy is a fully peer-reviewed international journal. Since its foundation in 2001 JECL has rapidly become a distinctive, leading voice in research in early childhood literacy, with a multinational range of contributors and readership. The main emphasis in the journal is on papers researching issues related to the nature, function and use of literacy in early childhood. This includes the history, development, use, learning and teaching of literacy, as well as policy and strategy. Research papers may address theoretical, methodological, strategic or applied aspects of early childhood literacy and could be reviews of research issues. JECL is both a forum for debate about the topic of early childhood literacy and a resource for those working in the field. Literacy is broadly defined; JECL focuses on the 0-8 age range. Our prime interest in empirical work is those studies that are situated in authentic or naturalistic settings; this differentiates the journal from others in the area. JECL, therefore, tends to favour qualitative work but is also open to research employing quantitative methods. The journal is multi-disciplinary. We welcome submissions from diverse disciplinary backgrounds including: education, cultural psychology, literacy studies, sociology, anthropology, historical and cultural studies, applied linguistics and semiotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信