The Golden Rule and Ancient Jewish Biblical Exegesis: The Pluriformity of a Tradition

IF 0.6 1区 哲学 0 RELIGION
M. Kister
{"title":"The Golden Rule and Ancient Jewish Biblical Exegesis: The Pluriformity of a Tradition","authors":"M. Kister","doi":"10.15699/jbl.1414.2022.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The present article is an integrative study of rabbinic sources in tandem with gospel pericopes, Pauline passages, and a passage of the Duae viae (included in the Didache). I contend that all these sources are variants of a Jewish tradition composed of two elements: (a) a maxim—the golden rule—or an equivalent biblical verse, Lev 19:18b; (b) an assertion that this maxim or verse summarizes the torah, or is the core of the whole torah (the difference in Hebrew is between kǝlāl, \"rule,\" and kōl, \"whole\"). The wording of these variants cuts across the putative division between the various corpora. Observing the pluriformity of this tradition is important for the study of both the New Testament and rabbinic literature, the focus of the present article. This study demonstrates that early phraseology may be preserved in late rabbinic texts, which thus problematizes the \"synoptic problem\" of rabbinic literature (and, mutatis mutandis, of the gospels). Similar wording should not blur different contents; affinities should not obscure inherent dynamics. The potential for a radical interpretation of the formulation that \"the whole torah\" is encapsulated in one verse or maxim has not been realized in rabbinic literature; the radical potential of the formulation was realized and developed by Paul in Gal 5:14.","PeriodicalId":15251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biblical Literature","volume":"141 1","pages":"717 - 735"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biblical Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1414.2022.7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The present article is an integrative study of rabbinic sources in tandem with gospel pericopes, Pauline passages, and a passage of the Duae viae (included in the Didache). I contend that all these sources are variants of a Jewish tradition composed of two elements: (a) a maxim—the golden rule—or an equivalent biblical verse, Lev 19:18b; (b) an assertion that this maxim or verse summarizes the torah, or is the core of the whole torah (the difference in Hebrew is between kǝlāl, "rule," and kōl, "whole"). The wording of these variants cuts across the putative division between the various corpora. Observing the pluriformity of this tradition is important for the study of both the New Testament and rabbinic literature, the focus of the present article. This study demonstrates that early phraseology may be preserved in late rabbinic texts, which thus problematizes the "synoptic problem" of rabbinic literature (and, mutatis mutandis, of the gospels). Similar wording should not blur different contents; affinities should not obscure inherent dynamics. The potential for a radical interpretation of the formulation that "the whole torah" is encapsulated in one verse or maxim has not been realized in rabbinic literature; the radical potential of the formulation was realized and developed by Paul in Gal 5:14.
黄金法则与古代犹太圣经训诂:传统的多元性
摘要:本文是一篇综合研究拉比资料、福音书pericopes、保罗段落和一段Duae viae(包括在十二使徒书信中)的文章。我认为所有这些来源都是由两个元素组成的犹太传统的变体:(a)格言——黄金法则——或相当于圣经的经文,利未记19:18b;(b)断言这个格言或诗句总结了torah,或者是整个torah的核心(希伯来语的区别是kǝlāl,“规则”和kōl,“整体”)。这些变体的措辞跨越了各种语料库之间假定的划分。观察这一传统的多样性对于研究新约和拉比文学都很重要,这也是本文的重点。这项研究表明,早期的措辞可能被保存在后期的拉比文本中,从而使拉比文献(以及福音书)的“符类问题”成为问题。相似的措辞不应模糊不同的内容;亲和力不应该掩盖内在的动态。在拉比文学中,对“整个托拉”被浓缩在一节经文或格言中的表述进行激进解释的可能性尚未实现;保罗在加拉太书5章14节实现并发展了这一提法的根本潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信