An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Medical School Musculoskeletal Curriculum at an Academic Medical Center

Q2 Social Sciences
Andy Lalka, R. Caldwell, A. Black, F. Scott
{"title":"An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Medical School Musculoskeletal Curriculum at an Academic Medical Center","authors":"Andy Lalka, R. Caldwell, A. Black, F. Scott","doi":"10.18870/HLRC.V8I2.422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Musculoskeletal disorders are common medical problems encountered by physicians and affected 126.6 million Americans in 2012.  Musculoskeletal education has inadequate in United States medical schools. \nObjective: To determine the musculoskeletal competency of third year medical students. \nMethods: A cross-sectional 25-question nationally validated musculoskeletal competency exam was given to the third year medical students.  A survey was given to second and third year medical students to assess students’ level of interest in musculoskeletal medicine and their feedback regarding the curriculum. \nResults:  The mean score of the competency exam was 69.0%.  There was 48/107 (44.9%) students’ who reached the minimum passing score of 70%.  Free-response feedback from both classes featured themes of more hands-on learning, a longer clinical block, and more small-group learning sessions. \nConclusions:  Third year medical students scored relatively well on the exam.  Student feedback suggests the 2-week musculoskeletal block is useful and relevant to their future careers.","PeriodicalId":37033,"journal":{"name":"Higher Learning Research Communications","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Learning Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18870/HLRC.V8I2.422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal disorders are common medical problems encountered by physicians and affected 126.6 million Americans in 2012.  Musculoskeletal education has inadequate in United States medical schools. Objective: To determine the musculoskeletal competency of third year medical students. Methods: A cross-sectional 25-question nationally validated musculoskeletal competency exam was given to the third year medical students.  A survey was given to second and third year medical students to assess students’ level of interest in musculoskeletal medicine and their feedback regarding the curriculum. Results:  The mean score of the competency exam was 69.0%.  There was 48/107 (44.9%) students’ who reached the minimum passing score of 70%.  Free-response feedback from both classes featured themes of more hands-on learning, a longer clinical block, and more small-group learning sessions. Conclusions:  Third year medical students scored relatively well on the exam.  Student feedback suggests the 2-week musculoskeletal block is useful and relevant to their future careers.
某学术医学中心医学院肌肉骨骼课程的有效性评估
背景:肌肉骨骼障碍是医生遇到的常见医疗问题,2012年影响了1.266亿美国人。美国医学院的肌肉骨骼教育不足。目的:确定医学三年级学生的肌肉骨骼能力。方法:对医学三年级的学生进行25道题的全国性肌肉骨骼能力考试。对医学二年级和三年级的学生进行了一项调查,以评估学生对肌肉骨骼医学的兴趣水平以及他们对课程的反馈。结果:能力测试的平均成绩为69.0%,达到最低及格分数70%的学生有48/107人(44.9%)。两个课程的免费反馈都以更多的动手学习、更长的临床区块和更多的小组学习为主题。结论:医学三年级学生的考试成绩相对较好。学生的反馈表明,为期两周的肌肉骨骼阻滞对他们未来的职业生涯很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Higher Learning Research Communications
Higher Learning Research Communications Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信