Power and motherhood in the 16th century: Perpetuity and memory through architecture

IF 0.5 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES
Feminismos Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.14198/fem.2023.41.04
María Elena Díez Jorge
{"title":"Power and motherhood in the 16th century: Perpetuity and memory through architecture","authors":"María Elena Díez Jorge","doi":"10.14198/fem.2023.41.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, we associate motherhood with the practice of caring for children. And that is correct, but we must be cautious because in care we find a wide range of habits that encompasses desires and needs that vary greatly according to social class, gender, age and time. In general, in the mentality of the 16th century, the mother not only played her motherhood role through upbringing, but sometimes it was more important to bequeath a lineage, a surname, goods or a house. It is on this point that this text is based in the spirit of recovering the agency of elite women, but also of the ones belonging to other social classes. On the one hand, as women who are promoters and patrons of a heritage that empowers them in the city (matronage) while allowing them to protect their descendants and perpetuate the lineage of which they consider themselves the guardians. On the other hand, women who are not of high lineage but who defend the house in which they live, even if it is not their property; because they have children and ask for shelter to be protected under a roof. Both cases can be interpreted as expressions of power, although at very different levels, because if in one case they are moved by the desire of projection and promotion of that mother as the matron of a lineage; in the other, being a mother and having children in charge can be a burden but also an argument in favor of defending the tenancy or occupation of a house. For this study we make use of archival documentation of the sixteenth century, but specifically from Granada, with a view to focusing on the various cases observed in the same city.","PeriodicalId":32557,"journal":{"name":"Feminismos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminismos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14198/fem.2023.41.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, we associate motherhood with the practice of caring for children. And that is correct, but we must be cautious because in care we find a wide range of habits that encompasses desires and needs that vary greatly according to social class, gender, age and time. In general, in the mentality of the 16th century, the mother not only played her motherhood role through upbringing, but sometimes it was more important to bequeath a lineage, a surname, goods or a house. It is on this point that this text is based in the spirit of recovering the agency of elite women, but also of the ones belonging to other social classes. On the one hand, as women who are promoters and patrons of a heritage that empowers them in the city (matronage) while allowing them to protect their descendants and perpetuate the lineage of which they consider themselves the guardians. On the other hand, women who are not of high lineage but who defend the house in which they live, even if it is not their property; because they have children and ask for shelter to be protected under a roof. Both cases can be interpreted as expressions of power, although at very different levels, because if in one case they are moved by the desire of projection and promotion of that mother as the matron of a lineage; in the other, being a mother and having children in charge can be a burden but also an argument in favor of defending the tenancy or occupation of a house. For this study we make use of archival documentation of the sixteenth century, but specifically from Granada, with a view to focusing on the various cases observed in the same city.
16世纪的权力与母性:建筑中的永恒与记忆
传统上,我们把做母亲和照顾孩子联系在一起。这是正确的,但我们必须谨慎,因为在护理中,我们会发现各种各样的习惯,其中包括欲望和需求,这些习惯因社会阶层、性别、年龄和时间的不同而有很大差异。总的来说,在16世纪的观念中,母亲不仅通过教养来扮演母亲的角色,有时更重要的是传承血统、姓氏、财产或房子。正是基于这一点,本文本着恢复精英女性能动性的精神,也恢复了属于其他社会阶层的女性的能动性。一方面,作为女性,她们是遗产的推动者和赞助人,在城市中赋予她们权力(女管家),同时允许她们保护自己的后代,并使她们认为自己是监护人的血统永久化。另一方面,不是高血统的妇女,她们捍卫自己居住的房子,即使那不是她们的财产;因为他们有孩子,要求在一个屋檐下得到保护。这两种情况都可以被解释为权力的表达,尽管在非常不同的层面上,因为如果在一个例子中,他们被母亲作为一个家族的女主人的投射和提升的愿望所感动;在另一种情况下,作为母亲和有孩子负责可能是一种负担,但也是一种支持捍卫房屋租赁或占用的论据。在这项研究中,我们利用了16世纪的档案文件,特别是来自格拉纳达的档案文件,目的是关注在同一城市观察到的各种案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信