Personal Appraisals of Support from the Perspective of Polish, Slovak, and American Children Who Stutter

Mary Weidner, Katarzyna Węsierska, Hana Laciková, Hilda Sønsterud, Signhild Skogdal, Kristin Åmodt, Kathleen Scaler‑Scott, Craig Coleman
{"title":"Personal Appraisals of Support from the Perspective of Polish, Slovak, and American Children Who Stutter","authors":"Mary Weidner, Katarzyna Węsierska, Hana Laciková, Hilda Sønsterud, Signhild Skogdal, Kristin Åmodt, Kathleen Scaler‑Scott, Craig Coleman","doi":"10.18778/2544-7238.06.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Limited research exists about what children who stutter perceive to be helpful and unhelpful listener supports, and no known research exists cross‑culturally. Such information is nec­essary to better inform clinical intervention and public attitudes at large. This study sought to address that need by measuring listener preferences among children who stutter from diverse backgrounds.\nOne‑hundred fifty‑one children who stutter from Poland, Slovakia, and the USA completed the child version of the Personal Appraisal of Support for Stuttering. Results were examined descriptively and compared cross‑culturally.\nThemes pertaining to very helpful and very unhelpful supports emerged across all groups. Many items fell in the neutral range, suggesting variability among individual speakers.\nBased on the groups examined, children who stutter primarily want listeners to be patient, to include them, and to not laugh when they are speaking. Other nuanced preferences un­derscore the importance of asking individuals about what they perceive to be helpful and un­helpful. Results of this study informed a listener guideline statement and an open‑access in­formational handout about how to be most supportive of children who stutter.","PeriodicalId":33254,"journal":{"name":"Logopaedica Lodziensia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logopaedica Lodziensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2544-7238.06.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limited research exists about what children who stutter perceive to be helpful and unhelpful listener supports, and no known research exists cross‑culturally. Such information is nec­essary to better inform clinical intervention and public attitudes at large. This study sought to address that need by measuring listener preferences among children who stutter from diverse backgrounds. One‑hundred fifty‑one children who stutter from Poland, Slovakia, and the USA completed the child version of the Personal Appraisal of Support for Stuttering. Results were examined descriptively and compared cross‑culturally. Themes pertaining to very helpful and very unhelpful supports emerged across all groups. Many items fell in the neutral range, suggesting variability among individual speakers. Based on the groups examined, children who stutter primarily want listeners to be patient, to include them, and to not laugh when they are speaking. Other nuanced preferences un­derscore the importance of asking individuals about what they perceive to be helpful and un­helpful. Results of this study informed a listener guideline statement and an open‑access in­formational handout about how to be most supportive of children who stutter.
波兰、斯洛伐克和美国口吃儿童对支持的个人评价
关于口吃儿童认为听众支持什么是有益的和无益的,研究有限,也没有已知的跨文化研究。这些信息对于更好地为临床干预和公众态度提供信息是必要的。这项研究试图通过测量来自不同背景的口吃儿童的听众偏好来解决这一需求。来自波兰、斯洛伐克和美国的151名口吃儿童完成了儿童版的口吃支持个人评估。对结果进行了描述性检查,并进行了跨文化比较。所有组都出现了与非常有用和非常无用的支持有关的问题。许多项目都属于中性范围,这表明个别发言者之间存在差异。根据所调查的小组,口吃的孩子主要希望听众有耐心,包容他们,并且在他们说话时不要笑。其他细致入微的偏好突显了询问个人认为什么是有益的和没有帮助的重要性。这项研究的结果为听众指南声明和关于如何最支持口吃儿童的开放获取信息讲义提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信