THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SELF-EFFICACY, STATE-TRAIT ANXIETY AND COGNITIVE TEST ANXIETY: A STUDY AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ARGENTINA

Q4 Psychology
Julian Andres Mur, A. Rivas, Daniela Agustina Trueba, Carolina Iris Pereyra Girardi
{"title":"THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SELF-EFFICACY, STATE-TRAIT ANXIETY AND COGNITIVE TEST ANXIETY: A STUDY AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN ARGENTINA","authors":"Julian Andres Mur, A. Rivas, Daniela Agustina Trueba, Carolina Iris Pereyra Girardi","doi":"10.37708/psyct.v15i2.664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explore and analyze the relationship between general self-efficacy, state and trait anxiety and test anxiety in private university students of psychology and psycho-pedagogy careers from Argentina. Results showed positive correlations between trait anxiety and test anxiety, and between state anxiety and test anxiety. Negative correlations emerged between general self-efficacy and state anxiety, trait anxiety and test anxiety. It was possible to verify that high levels of general self-efficacy together with low levels of trait anxiety predicted 27% test anxiety variance. While similar results were found in previous works, these findings amplify the scope of research to specific contexts such as Latin American university students. It is recommended to continue the study of these variables in situations as close as possible to the exam situation and considering changes in educational setting worldwide due to the COVID-19 pandemic, thus allowing the promotion of student’s welfare throughout programs that promote general self-efficacy as a protective variable.","PeriodicalId":37380,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Thought","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37708/psyct.v15i2.664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to explore and analyze the relationship between general self-efficacy, state and trait anxiety and test anxiety in private university students of psychology and psycho-pedagogy careers from Argentina. Results showed positive correlations between trait anxiety and test anxiety, and between state anxiety and test anxiety. Negative correlations emerged between general self-efficacy and state anxiety, trait anxiety and test anxiety. It was possible to verify that high levels of general self-efficacy together with low levels of trait anxiety predicted 27% test anxiety variance. While similar results were found in previous works, these findings amplify the scope of research to specific contexts such as Latin American university students. It is recommended to continue the study of these variables in situations as close as possible to the exam situation and considering changes in educational setting worldwide due to the COVID-19 pandemic, thus allowing the promotion of student’s welfare throughout programs that promote general self-efficacy as a protective variable.
自我效能感、状态-特质焦虑与认知考试焦虑的关系:阿根廷大学生的研究
本研究旨在探讨和分析阿根廷私立大学心理学和心理教育学专业学生的一般自我效能感、状态和特质焦虑以及考试焦虑之间的关系。结果表明,特质焦虑与测试焦虑呈正相关,状态焦虑与考试焦虑呈正相关。一般自我效能感与状态焦虑、特质焦虑和测试焦虑呈负相关。可以证实,高水平的一般自我效能感和低水平的特质焦虑预测了27%的测试焦虑方差。虽然在以前的工作中也发现了类似的结果,但这些发现将研究范围扩大到了特定的背景,如拉丁美洲大学生。建议在尽可能接近考试情况的情况下继续研究这些变量,并考虑到新冠肺炎大流行导致的全球教育环境的变化,从而在促进一般自我效能作为保护变量的整个项目中促进学生的福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Thought
Psychological Thought Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal "Psychological Thought" publishes its papers in English or in Bulgarian in all areas of psychology. It is focused on the psychological theory and practice. The papers could be some original research articles, meta-analysis data, clinical reports, case studies, students'' essays, and book reviews. This journal is designed for psychologists, researchers, and psychology students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信