An Awareness and Demand Survey on Agro-Healing Among Adults with Symptoms of Stress

Q3 Social Sciences
Yun-Jin Kim, Seon-Ok Kim, Na-Yoon Choi, Seok-Hee Ryu, Sin-Ae Park
{"title":"An Awareness and Demand Survey on Agro-Healing Among Adults with Symptoms of Stress","authors":"Yun-Jin Kim, Seon-Ok Kim, Na-Yoon Choi, Seok-Hee Ryu, Sin-Ae Park","doi":"10.11628/ksppe.2022.25.4.385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective: This study conducted an awareness and demand survey on agro-healing for the purpose of preparing basic data for developing agro-healing programs and improving service quality to heal the mental health of people with symptoms of stress.Methods: In order to conduct this study, a questionnaire consisting of 23 items was developed to investigate the awareness and demand for agro-healing. The survey was conducted online on adults in their 20s and 30s showing symptoms of stress. A total of 225 copies of the questionnaire were collected, and 183 copies were finally used for analysis.Results: The survey results showed that 66.1% of the respondents were 'not aware at all' and 33.9% were 'aware' of agro-healing. Regarding the experience of participating in agro-healing, 68.3% of the respondents said they had 'no experience' and 31.7% said they had 'experience'. Among the respondents with experience, the most common purpose of participation was 'experience' (31.0%), followed by 'education' (27.6%), 'leisure' (20.7%), 'healing' (10.3%), and 'recreation' (5.1%). The intent to participate in agro-healing was rated on a 5-point Likert scale, and 'forest healing' scored 4.0 points, 'horticultural therapy' 3.8 points, 'animal-assisted therapy' 3.8 points, and 'agricultural work healing' 3.2 points. The points to be improved when using the agro-healing service are 'lack of various promotional contents' (73.8%), 'lack of education and training programs' (13.7%), 'lack of partnership with the government' (7.1%), and 'lack of consideration for the underprivileged' (5.5%). 74.3% of the respondents said it is necessary to implement and systemize agro-healing policies, 21.3% said it was 'moderate', and 4.3% said it was 'unnecessary', indicating that there was high awareness of the need to implement agro-healing service policies.Conclusion: This study is expected to provide basic data for effective agro-healing services to treat the mental health of people with stress symptoms and be used as a reference material for making policy suggestions to establish an organized agro-healing system.","PeriodicalId":52383,"journal":{"name":"Journal of People, Plants, and Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of People, Plants, and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2022.25.4.385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: This study conducted an awareness and demand survey on agro-healing for the purpose of preparing basic data for developing agro-healing programs and improving service quality to heal the mental health of people with symptoms of stress.Methods: In order to conduct this study, a questionnaire consisting of 23 items was developed to investigate the awareness and demand for agro-healing. The survey was conducted online on adults in their 20s and 30s showing symptoms of stress. A total of 225 copies of the questionnaire were collected, and 183 copies were finally used for analysis.Results: The survey results showed that 66.1% of the respondents were 'not aware at all' and 33.9% were 'aware' of agro-healing. Regarding the experience of participating in agro-healing, 68.3% of the respondents said they had 'no experience' and 31.7% said they had 'experience'. Among the respondents with experience, the most common purpose of participation was 'experience' (31.0%), followed by 'education' (27.6%), 'leisure' (20.7%), 'healing' (10.3%), and 'recreation' (5.1%). The intent to participate in agro-healing was rated on a 5-point Likert scale, and 'forest healing' scored 4.0 points, 'horticultural therapy' 3.8 points, 'animal-assisted therapy' 3.8 points, and 'agricultural work healing' 3.2 points. The points to be improved when using the agro-healing service are 'lack of various promotional contents' (73.8%), 'lack of education and training programs' (13.7%), 'lack of partnership with the government' (7.1%), and 'lack of consideration for the underprivileged' (5.5%). 74.3% of the respondents said it is necessary to implement and systemize agro-healing policies, 21.3% said it was 'moderate', and 4.3% said it was 'unnecessary', indicating that there was high awareness of the need to implement agro-healing service policies.Conclusion: This study is expected to provide basic data for effective agro-healing services to treat the mental health of people with stress symptoms and be used as a reference material for making policy suggestions to establish an organized agro-healing system.
有应激症状的成年人对农业康复的认识和需求调查
背景与目的:本研究通过对农业愈合的认知与需求调查,为制定农业愈合方案,提高服务质量,治疗有压力症状人群的心理健康提供基础数据。方法:为进行本研究,设计了一份共23个项目的调查问卷,调查农户对农业治疗的认知和需求。该调查是在网上对20多岁和30多岁表现出压力症状的成年人进行的。共收集问卷225份,最终使用183份进行分析。结果:调查结果显示,66.1%的受访者“完全不知道”,33.9%的受访者“知道”农业愈合。关于参与农业治疗的经验,68.3%的受访者表示“没有经验”,31.7%的受访者表示有“经验”。在有经验的受访者中,最常见的参与目的是“体验”(31.0%),其次是“教育”(27.6%)、“休闲”(20.7%)、“治愈”(10.3%)和“娱乐”(5.1%)。参与农业治疗的意愿以5分的李克特量表打分,“森林治疗”得分4.0分,“园艺治疗”得分3.8分,“动物辅助治疗”得分3.8分,“农业工作治疗”得分3.2分。在使用农业治疗服务时,需要改善的问题是“缺乏各种宣传内容”(73.8%)、“缺乏教育和培训计划”(13.7%)、“缺乏与政府的伙伴关系”(7.1%)、“缺乏对弱势群体的照顾”(5.5%)。74.3%的回答者认为有必要实施农业愈合政策并使之系统化,21.3%的回答者认为“适度”,4.3%的回答者认为“没有必要”,表明对实施农业愈合服务政策的必要性有很高的认识。结论:本研究可为开展有效的农业愈合服务,治疗应激症状人群的心理健康提供基础数据,并为建立有组织的农业愈合体系提供政策建议参考资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of People, Plants, and Environment
Journal of People, Plants, and Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信