Different values lead to alternative approaches to the land debate in South Africa

IF 0.6 Q4 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING
Das Steÿn
{"title":"Different values lead to alternative approaches to the land debate in South Africa","authors":"Das Steÿn","doi":"10.18820/2415-0495/trp75i1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In South Africa, two traditional cultures, namely the African and the European cultures, meet, each with its own historical view on what land is and how to govern it. This situation is complicated by modernist ideological thinking represented by capitalism and communism. Goudappel’s urbanistic concept1 is used to show how ideological thinking influences theory and practice when contemplating the land issue. This answer is not a single approach, but a multiple view on land which allows for different regions, each with its own solution coupled with its cultural background, in order for all the different peoples in this country to have a place in the sun. Therefore, this article gives a theoretical explanation that there are different value systems that influence the approach to possible solutions of the land issue in South Africa.","PeriodicalId":42151,"journal":{"name":"Town and Regional Planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Town and Regional Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/2415-0495/trp75i1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In South Africa, two traditional cultures, namely the African and the European cultures, meet, each with its own historical view on what land is and how to govern it. This situation is complicated by modernist ideological thinking represented by capitalism and communism. Goudappel’s urbanistic concept1 is used to show how ideological thinking influences theory and practice when contemplating the land issue. This answer is not a single approach, but a multiple view on land which allows for different regions, each with its own solution coupled with its cultural background, in order for all the different peoples in this country to have a place in the sun. Therefore, this article gives a theoretical explanation that there are different value systems that influence the approach to possible solutions of the land issue in South Africa.
不同的价值观导致南非土地辩论的不同方法
在南非,两种传统文化,即非洲文化和欧洲文化相遇,各自对什么是土地以及如何治理土地有着自己的历史观点,这种情况因以资本主义和共产主义为代表的现代主义思想而变得复杂。Goudapel的城市化概念1用于展示在思考土地问题时,意识形态思维如何影响理论和实践。这个答案不是单一的方法,而是对土地的多重看法,允许不同的地区,每个地区都有自己的解决方案和文化背景,以便这个国家的所有不同民族都能在阳光下占有一席之地。因此,本文从理论上解释了存在不同的价值体系影响南非土地问题可能解决方案的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Town and Regional Planning
Town and Regional Planning REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信