Comparative Analysis of Blockchain-Based Platforms for Managing Electronic Health Records in the Public Healthcare System of Brazil

Q4 Computer Science
C. K. D. S. Rodrigues
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Blockchain-Based Platforms for Managing Electronic Health Records in the Public Healthcare System of Brazil","authors":"C. K. D. S. Rodrigues","doi":"10.22456/2175-2745.125396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article comparatively analyzes two platforms based on Blockchain, aiming at the management of electronic health records in the public healthcare system of Brazil. The difference between the platforms primarily lies in the deployed consensus algorithm. Efficiency, availability, integrity, and confidentiality requirements are evaluated through analytical models and theoretical discussions. Among the obtained results, we highlight the following: (i) the platform with a voting-based consensus algorithm yields a more efficient system, but is more prone to service unavailability, than that of the platform deploying an intensive-compute consensus algorithm; (ii) integrity and confidentiality requirements may be satisfactorily met regardless of the consensus type. As the main contribution, this article provides valuable experimental results and theoretical subsidies, which together complement previous research and help to lay the groundwork for the fruitful development of real projects. Finally, conclusions and future work conclude this article.","PeriodicalId":53421,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Informatica Teorica e Aplicada","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Informatica Teorica e Aplicada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22456/2175-2745.125396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article comparatively analyzes two platforms based on Blockchain, aiming at the management of electronic health records in the public healthcare system of Brazil. The difference between the platforms primarily lies in the deployed consensus algorithm. Efficiency, availability, integrity, and confidentiality requirements are evaluated through analytical models and theoretical discussions. Among the obtained results, we highlight the following: (i) the platform with a voting-based consensus algorithm yields a more efficient system, but is more prone to service unavailability, than that of the platform deploying an intensive-compute consensus algorithm; (ii) integrity and confidentiality requirements may be satisfactorily met regardless of the consensus type. As the main contribution, this article provides valuable experimental results and theoretical subsidies, which together complement previous research and help to lay the groundwork for the fruitful development of real projects. Finally, conclusions and future work conclude this article.
巴西公共医疗系统中基于区块链的电子病历管理平台的比较分析
本文针对巴西公共医疗系统中电子病历的管理,对基于区块链的两个平台进行了比较分析。平台之间的区别主要在于部署的共识算法。效率、可用性、完整性和保密性要求通过分析模型和理论讨论进行评估。在获得的结果中,我们强调了以下几点:(i)与部署密集计算共识算法的平台相比,使用基于投票的共识算法的平台产生了更高效的系统,但更容易出现服务不可用;(ii)无论是何种协商一致方式,均可满意地满足完整性和保密性要求。作为本文的主要贡献,本文提供了有价值的实验结果和理论补贴,共同补充了前人的研究,并为实际项目的丰硕发展奠定了基础。最后,对本文的结论和今后的工作进行总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Informatica Teorica e Aplicada
Revista de Informatica Teorica e Aplicada Computer Science-Computer Science (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信