Effect of smear layer on calcium hydroxide removal from root canal using different systems: An ex-vivo study

A. Heda, N. Manwar, Akshi Rathi, Gayatri Deshmukh, N. Rahul, Deepashri Tekam, Chandani Bhatia
{"title":"Effect of smear layer on calcium hydroxide removal from root canal using different systems: An ex-vivo study","authors":"A. Heda, N. Manwar, Akshi Rathi, Gayatri Deshmukh, N. Rahul, Deepashri Tekam, Chandani Bhatia","doi":"10.4103/sdj.sdj_104_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: For successful multi-visit endodontic treatment, clinicians often use calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medicament, and it is necessary to completely remove it from canal before obturation. Presence or absence of a smear layer may play an important role in the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canal systems. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the smear layer on the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canal walls using manual files, ultrasonic files, and an EndoActivator System under a stereomicroscope and to evaluate the effect of sodium hypochlorite solution and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution with sodium hypochlorite solution on the removal of the smear layer from root canals during biomechanical preparation. Methods: A total of 80 extracted premolars were decoronated. They were divided into groups and subgroups, and then further evaluation was performed. Root canal instrumentation was done using #25, 0.06 taper nickel-titanium rotary files (Neoendo, Orikam, Gurgaon, India) using the crown-down technique. Samples were divided into two groups: Group A (with a smear layer) and Group B (without a smear layer), for the placement of calcium hydroxide. They were then divided into three subgroups to evaluate the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canal walls using manual files, ultrasonic files, and an EndoActivator and were examined under a stereomicroscope at magnification 10× with image analysis software. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc test. Results: The removal of calcium hydroxide from dentinal walls was significantly better in Group B (p <0.05) than in Group A in cervical, middle, and apical third of the canals. Conclusion: Removal of calcium hydroxide was more efficient in Group B (smear-free) than in Group A (with a smear layer), regardless of the technique used. A comparison of the techniques showed that ultrasonic files were more efficient in removing calcium hydroxide than manual files and EndoActivator System in both study groups.","PeriodicalId":32049,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Dental Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"74 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sdj.sdj_104_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For successful multi-visit endodontic treatment, clinicians often use calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medicament, and it is necessary to completely remove it from canal before obturation. Presence or absence of a smear layer may play an important role in the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canal systems. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the smear layer on the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canal walls using manual files, ultrasonic files, and an EndoActivator System under a stereomicroscope and to evaluate the effect of sodium hypochlorite solution and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution with sodium hypochlorite solution on the removal of the smear layer from root canals during biomechanical preparation. Methods: A total of 80 extracted premolars were decoronated. They were divided into groups and subgroups, and then further evaluation was performed. Root canal instrumentation was done using #25, 0.06 taper nickel-titanium rotary files (Neoendo, Orikam, Gurgaon, India) using the crown-down technique. Samples were divided into two groups: Group A (with a smear layer) and Group B (without a smear layer), for the placement of calcium hydroxide. They were then divided into three subgroups to evaluate the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canal walls using manual files, ultrasonic files, and an EndoActivator and were examined under a stereomicroscope at magnification 10× with image analysis software. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc test. Results: The removal of calcium hydroxide from dentinal walls was significantly better in Group B (p <0.05) than in Group A in cervical, middle, and apical third of the canals. Conclusion: Removal of calcium hydroxide was more efficient in Group B (smear-free) than in Group A (with a smear layer), regardless of the technique used. A comparison of the techniques showed that ultrasonic files were more efficient in removing calcium hydroxide than manual files and EndoActivator System in both study groups.
涂抹层对不同系统根管氢氧化钙清除效果的体外研究
背景:为了成功地进行多次根管治疗,临床医生经常使用氢氧化钙作为管内药物,并且有必要在充填前将其从管内完全清除。涂抹层的存在或不存在可能在从根管系统中去除氢氧化钙方面发挥重要作用。目的:本研究旨在评估涂抹层对使用手动锉刀、超声锉刀、超声波锉刀和超声波锉刀去除根管壁氢氧化钙的效果,以及在立体显微镜下的EndoActivator系统,并评估次氯酸钠溶液和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)溶液与次氯酸钠溶液在生物力学准备过程中对从根管去除涂抹层的影响。方法:对80颗拔除的前磨牙进行去骨处理。他们被分为小组和亚组,然后进行进一步的评估。根管内固定使用#25.06锥形镍钛旋转锉(Neoendo,Orikam,Gurgaon,India),使用牙冠向下技术。样品分为两组:A组(有涂抹层)和B组(无涂抹层),用于放置氢氧化钙。然后将他们分为三个亚组,使用手动锉刀、超声波锉刀和EndoActivator评估从根管壁去除氢氧化钙的情况,并在放大10倍的立体显微镜下用图像分析软件进行检查。使用方差分析和Tukey的事后检验进行统计分析。结果:B组对牙本质壁氢氧化钙的去除效果明显好于A组(p<0.05)。结论:无论使用何种技术,B组(无涂抹)的氢氧化钙去除效果均高于A组(有涂抹层)。两种技术的比较表明,在两个研究组中,超声波锉刀在去除氢氧化钙方面比手动锉刀和EndoActivator系统更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信